New version of derivative consequence argument and response to objections

In this paper, I respond to the objections and comments, which are raised by D. Razeev, T. Demin, and M. Sekatskaya. I provide a new formulation of the argument, which avoids all the problems mentioned by these philosophers in their papers and at the conferences

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Author: B. V. Faul
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Omsk State Technical University, Federal State Autonomous Educational Institution of Higher Education 2020-12-01
Series:Омский научный вестник: Серия "Общество. История. Современность"
Subjects:
Online Access:https://www.omgtu.ru/general_information/media_omgtu/journal_of_omsk_research_journal/files/arhiv/2020/%D0%A2.%205,%20%E2%84%96%204%20(%D0%9E%D0%98%D0%A1)/72-74%20%D0%A4%D0%B0%D1%83%D0%BB%D1%8C%20%D0%91.%20%D0%92..pdf
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
_version_ 1832569515898044416
author B. V. Faul
author_facet B. V. Faul
author_sort B. V. Faul
collection DOAJ
description In this paper, I respond to the objections and comments, which are raised by D. Razeev, T. Demin, and M. Sekatskaya. I provide a new formulation of the argument, which avoids all the problems mentioned by these philosophers in their papers and at the conferences
format Article
id doaj-art-42ba01bc0c2f43b0a2759e9ff95b6da0
institution Kabale University
issn 2542-0488
2541-7983
language English
publishDate 2020-12-01
publisher Omsk State Technical University, Federal State Autonomous Educational Institution of Higher Education
record_format Article
series Омский научный вестник: Серия "Общество. История. Современность"
spelling doaj-art-42ba01bc0c2f43b0a2759e9ff95b6da02025-02-02T20:30:13ZengOmsk State Technical University, Federal State Autonomous Educational Institution of Higher EducationОмский научный вестник: Серия "Общество. История. Современность"2542-04882541-79832020-12-0154727410.25206/2542-0488-2020-5-4-72-74New version of derivative consequence argument and response to objectionsB. V. Faul0Institute of PhilosophyIn this paper, I respond to the objections and comments, which are raised by D. Razeev, T. Demin, and M. Sekatskaya. I provide a new formulation of the argument, which avoids all the problems mentioned by these philosophers in their papers and at the conferenceshttps://www.omgtu.ru/general_information/media_omgtu/journal_of_omsk_research_journal/files/arhiv/2020/%D0%A2.%205,%20%E2%84%96%204%20(%D0%9E%D0%98%D0%A1)/72-74%20%D0%A4%D0%B0%D1%83%D0%BB%D1%8C%20%D0%91.%20%D0%92..pdfderivative consequence argumentfree willlaws of naturemoral responsibility
spellingShingle B. V. Faul
New version of derivative consequence argument and response to objections
Омский научный вестник: Серия "Общество. История. Современность"
derivative consequence argument
free will
laws of nature
moral responsibility
title New version of derivative consequence argument and response to objections
title_full New version of derivative consequence argument and response to objections
title_fullStr New version of derivative consequence argument and response to objections
title_full_unstemmed New version of derivative consequence argument and response to objections
title_short New version of derivative consequence argument and response to objections
title_sort new version of derivative consequence argument and response to objections
topic derivative consequence argument
free will
laws of nature
moral responsibility
url https://www.omgtu.ru/general_information/media_omgtu/journal_of_omsk_research_journal/files/arhiv/2020/%D0%A2.%205,%20%E2%84%96%204%20(%D0%9E%D0%98%D0%A1)/72-74%20%D0%A4%D0%B0%D1%83%D0%BB%D1%8C%20%D0%91.%20%D0%92..pdf
work_keys_str_mv AT bvfaul newversionofderivativeconsequenceargumentandresponsetoobjections