Edge vs. Cloud: Empirical Insights into Data-Driven Condition Monitoring
This study evaluates edge and cloud computing paradigms in the context of data-driven condition monitoring of rotating electrical machines. Two well-known platforms, the Raspberry Pi and Amazon Web Services Elastic Compute Cloud, are used to compare and contrast these two computing paradigms in term...
Saved in:
| Main Authors: | , |
|---|---|
| Format: | Article |
| Language: | English |
| Published: |
MDPI AG
2025-05-01
|
| Series: | Big Data and Cognitive Computing |
| Subjects: | |
| Online Access: | https://www.mdpi.com/2504-2289/9/5/121 |
| Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
| Summary: | This study evaluates edge and cloud computing paradigms in the context of data-driven condition monitoring of rotating electrical machines. Two well-known platforms, the Raspberry Pi and Amazon Web Services Elastic Compute Cloud, are used to compare and contrast these two computing paradigms in terms of different metrics associated with their application suitability. The tested induction machine fault diagnosis models are developed using popular algorithms, namely support vector machines, k-nearest neighbours, and decision trees. The findings reveal that while the cloud platform offers superior computational and memory resources, making it more suitable for complex machine learning tasks, it also incurs higher costs and latency. On the other hand, the edge platform excels in real-time processing and reduces network data burden, but its computational and memory resources are found to be a limitation with certain tasks. The study provides both quantitative and qualitative insights into the trade-offs involved in selecting the most suitable computing approach for condition monitoring applications. Although the scope of the empirical study is primarily limited to factors such as computational efficiency, scalability, and resource utilisation, particularly in the context of specific machine learning models, this paper offers broader discussion and future research directions of other key issues, including latency, network variability, and energy consumption. |
|---|---|
| ISSN: | 2504-2289 |