Questioning Agency Through Intergenerational Dialogue: The Adult Ghosts and the Forgetting Children in Rudyard Kipling’s Puck of Pook’s Hill

From its initial publication, Rudyard Kipling’s Puck of Pook’s Hill has been regarded as children’s literature and Kipling’s imperialism—how he teaches and justifies British Empire’s imperial ideology—has been the main issue for critics in children’s literature studies. With the same issue in mind,...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Hera Kim
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Presses Universitaires de la Méditerranée 2020-12-01
Series:Cahiers Victoriens et Edouardiens
Subjects:
Online Access:https://journals.openedition.org/cve/8036
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
_version_ 1832581227215847424
author Hera Kim
author_facet Hera Kim
author_sort Hera Kim
collection DOAJ
description From its initial publication, Rudyard Kipling’s Puck of Pook’s Hill has been regarded as children’s literature and Kipling’s imperialism—how he teaches and justifies British Empire’s imperial ideology—has been the main issue for critics in children’s literature studies. With the same issue in mind, I aim to complicate Kipling’s imperialism in Puck by revealing the ‘overlaid tints and textures’ embedded in the intergenerational dialogue between the adult heroes and the children. Specifically, this essay argues that Kipling does not simply represent the adult voice within the imperial discourse, but rather renders ambiguity in uniting the anxieties of the Empire’s previous generation and the hopes for the Empire’s future generation. In the story, although Kipling’s narrative return to the construction of the old England and evocation of its war heroes seem designed for the Empire’s imperialism, the conversations between the adult heroes and Dan and Una raise the unsettling issue of the past heroes’ being wounded ghosts brought about by the British Empire’s imperialism. To construct the questioning narrative, Kipling employs the children as engaging collaborators, but he also restrains them, through the device of the magical amnesia, from being fully grown agents. Rendering the ambiguous agency of both the adults and the children, Kipling most importantly challenges the questionable agency of the British Empire.
format Article
id doaj-art-421ed89727a648d89b59224f3cdf5c8b
institution Kabale University
issn 0220-5610
2271-6149
language English
publishDate 2020-12-01
publisher Presses Universitaires de la Méditerranée
record_format Article
series Cahiers Victoriens et Edouardiens
spelling doaj-art-421ed89727a648d89b59224f3cdf5c8b2025-01-30T10:22:18ZengPresses Universitaires de la MéditerranéeCahiers Victoriens et Edouardiens0220-56102271-61492020-12-019210.4000/cve.8036Questioning Agency Through Intergenerational Dialogue: The Adult Ghosts and the Forgetting Children in Rudyard Kipling’s Puck of Pook’s HillHera KimFrom its initial publication, Rudyard Kipling’s Puck of Pook’s Hill has been regarded as children’s literature and Kipling’s imperialism—how he teaches and justifies British Empire’s imperial ideology—has been the main issue for critics in children’s literature studies. With the same issue in mind, I aim to complicate Kipling’s imperialism in Puck by revealing the ‘overlaid tints and textures’ embedded in the intergenerational dialogue between the adult heroes and the children. Specifically, this essay argues that Kipling does not simply represent the adult voice within the imperial discourse, but rather renders ambiguity in uniting the anxieties of the Empire’s previous generation and the hopes for the Empire’s future generation. In the story, although Kipling’s narrative return to the construction of the old England and evocation of its war heroes seem designed for the Empire’s imperialism, the conversations between the adult heroes and Dan and Una raise the unsettling issue of the past heroes’ being wounded ghosts brought about by the British Empire’s imperialism. To construct the questioning narrative, Kipling employs the children as engaging collaborators, but he also restrains them, through the device of the magical amnesia, from being fully grown agents. Rendering the ambiguous agency of both the adults and the children, Kipling most importantly challenges the questionable agency of the British Empire.https://journals.openedition.org/cve/8036Kipling (Rudyard)British imperialismchildren’s literaturechild agencychild narrator
spellingShingle Hera Kim
Questioning Agency Through Intergenerational Dialogue: The Adult Ghosts and the Forgetting Children in Rudyard Kipling’s Puck of Pook’s Hill
Cahiers Victoriens et Edouardiens
Kipling (Rudyard)
British imperialism
children’s literature
child agency
child narrator
title Questioning Agency Through Intergenerational Dialogue: The Adult Ghosts and the Forgetting Children in Rudyard Kipling’s Puck of Pook’s Hill
title_full Questioning Agency Through Intergenerational Dialogue: The Adult Ghosts and the Forgetting Children in Rudyard Kipling’s Puck of Pook’s Hill
title_fullStr Questioning Agency Through Intergenerational Dialogue: The Adult Ghosts and the Forgetting Children in Rudyard Kipling’s Puck of Pook’s Hill
title_full_unstemmed Questioning Agency Through Intergenerational Dialogue: The Adult Ghosts and the Forgetting Children in Rudyard Kipling’s Puck of Pook’s Hill
title_short Questioning Agency Through Intergenerational Dialogue: The Adult Ghosts and the Forgetting Children in Rudyard Kipling’s Puck of Pook’s Hill
title_sort questioning agency through intergenerational dialogue the adult ghosts and the forgetting children in rudyard kipling s puck of pook s hill
topic Kipling (Rudyard)
British imperialism
children’s literature
child agency
child narrator
url https://journals.openedition.org/cve/8036
work_keys_str_mv AT herakim questioningagencythroughintergenerationaldialoguetheadultghostsandtheforgettingchildreninrudyardkiplingspuckofpookshill