Clinical and radiographic comparison of primary molar pulpotomy using formocresol, portland cement, and NeoMTA plus: a randomized controlled clinical trial
Abstract The present study aimed to compare the clinical and radiographic success rates of Formocresol (FC), Portland Cement (PC), and NeoMTA Plus in primary molar pulpotomy. Ninety-six primary molars in ninety-six children aged 3‒9 years were randomly assigned to FC, PC, and NeoMTA Plus groups. Rad...
Saved in:
| Main Authors: | , , |
|---|---|
| Format: | Article |
| Language: | English |
| Published: |
Nature Portfolio
2024-11-01
|
| Series: | Scientific Reports |
| Online Access: | https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-024-81180-w |
| Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
| _version_ | 1832571648077725696 |
|---|---|
| author | Elham Farokh Gisour Fatemeh Jahanimoghadam Pouya Karimipour |
| author_facet | Elham Farokh Gisour Fatemeh Jahanimoghadam Pouya Karimipour |
| author_sort | Elham Farokh Gisour |
| collection | DOAJ |
| description | Abstract The present study aimed to compare the clinical and radiographic success rates of Formocresol (FC), Portland Cement (PC), and NeoMTA Plus in primary molar pulpotomy. Ninety-six primary molars in ninety-six children aged 3‒9 years were randomly assigned to FC, PC, and NeoMTA Plus groups. Radiographic and clinical follow-up evaluations were performed at six and twelve months. After six and twelve months, clinical success rates were 100% in the three groups. The radiographic success rates in the 6-month follow-up were 96.7 and 96.7% in the FC and PC groups and 100% in the NeoMTA Plus group. At 12 months, radiographic success rate was 93.8, and 93.8% in the FC and PC groups and 96.9% in the NeoMTA Plus group. There were no significant differences between the three groups at all follow-up evaluations. NeoMTA Plus showed highest success rate, clinically and radiographically. PC and NeoMTA Plus can be considered as an alternative to FC. |
| format | Article |
| id | doaj-art-41f4be63ea094240baa4b41ba018f823 |
| institution | Kabale University |
| issn | 2045-2322 |
| language | English |
| publishDate | 2024-11-01 |
| publisher | Nature Portfolio |
| record_format | Article |
| series | Scientific Reports |
| spelling | doaj-art-41f4be63ea094240baa4b41ba018f8232025-02-02T12:25:05ZengNature PortfolioScientific Reports2045-23222024-11-011411910.1038/s41598-024-81180-wClinical and radiographic comparison of primary molar pulpotomy using formocresol, portland cement, and NeoMTA plus: a randomized controlled clinical trialElham Farokh Gisour0Fatemeh Jahanimoghadam1Pouya Karimipour2Endodontology Research Center, Kerman University of Medical SciencesSocial Determinants on Oral Health Research Center, Kerman University of Medical SciencesSocial Determinants on Oral Health Research Center, Kerman University of Medical SciencesAbstract The present study aimed to compare the clinical and radiographic success rates of Formocresol (FC), Portland Cement (PC), and NeoMTA Plus in primary molar pulpotomy. Ninety-six primary molars in ninety-six children aged 3‒9 years were randomly assigned to FC, PC, and NeoMTA Plus groups. Radiographic and clinical follow-up evaluations were performed at six and twelve months. After six and twelve months, clinical success rates were 100% in the three groups. The radiographic success rates in the 6-month follow-up were 96.7 and 96.7% in the FC and PC groups and 100% in the NeoMTA Plus group. At 12 months, radiographic success rate was 93.8, and 93.8% in the FC and PC groups and 96.9% in the NeoMTA Plus group. There were no significant differences between the three groups at all follow-up evaluations. NeoMTA Plus showed highest success rate, clinically and radiographically. PC and NeoMTA Plus can be considered as an alternative to FC.https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-024-81180-w |
| spellingShingle | Elham Farokh Gisour Fatemeh Jahanimoghadam Pouya Karimipour Clinical and radiographic comparison of primary molar pulpotomy using formocresol, portland cement, and NeoMTA plus: a randomized controlled clinical trial Scientific Reports |
| title | Clinical and radiographic comparison of primary molar pulpotomy using formocresol, portland cement, and NeoMTA plus: a randomized controlled clinical trial |
| title_full | Clinical and radiographic comparison of primary molar pulpotomy using formocresol, portland cement, and NeoMTA plus: a randomized controlled clinical trial |
| title_fullStr | Clinical and radiographic comparison of primary molar pulpotomy using formocresol, portland cement, and NeoMTA plus: a randomized controlled clinical trial |
| title_full_unstemmed | Clinical and radiographic comparison of primary molar pulpotomy using formocresol, portland cement, and NeoMTA plus: a randomized controlled clinical trial |
| title_short | Clinical and radiographic comparison of primary molar pulpotomy using formocresol, portland cement, and NeoMTA plus: a randomized controlled clinical trial |
| title_sort | clinical and radiographic comparison of primary molar pulpotomy using formocresol portland cement and neomta plus a randomized controlled clinical trial |
| url | https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-024-81180-w |
| work_keys_str_mv | AT elhamfarokhgisour clinicalandradiographiccomparisonofprimarymolarpulpotomyusingformocresolportlandcementandneomtaplusarandomizedcontrolledclinicaltrial AT fatemehjahanimoghadam clinicalandradiographiccomparisonofprimarymolarpulpotomyusingformocresolportlandcementandneomtaplusarandomizedcontrolledclinicaltrial AT pouyakarimipour clinicalandradiographiccomparisonofprimarymolarpulpotomyusingformocresolportlandcementandneomtaplusarandomizedcontrolledclinicaltrial |