La méthodologie : n’en faire qu’un discours ou bien reconnaître sa nécessité ?
Why would a historian of science read the work of the recently deceased legal historian Michael Stolleis ? Because his comparatist, transparent and interdisciplinary approach, and his willingness to highlight concrete examples, are already real sources of inspiration for historians. And, because in...
Saved in:
| Main Author: | Hervé Ferrière |
|---|---|
| Format: | Article |
| Language: | fra |
| Published: |
Association Clio et Themis
2024-06-01
|
| Series: | Clio@Themis |
| Subjects: | |
| Online Access: | https://journals.openedition.org/cliothemis/4690 |
| Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
Similar Items
-
Garanties legals de la privacitat al Regne Unit: la (des)protecció de dades després del Brexit
by: Marina Sancho López
Published: (2019-04-01) -
Les juristes humanistes de la Renaissance, des anthropologues en puissance ? Réflexions autour de quelques études (principalement françaises) de cas
by: Géraldine Cazals
Published: (2019-02-01) -
Annelies Lannoy, Alfred Loisy and the Making of History of Religions. A Study of the Development of Comparative Religion in the Early 20th Century
by: Grazia Grasso
Published: (2022-07-01) -
Qu’est-ce qu’une favela ?
by: Licia Valladares
Published: (2000-07-01) -
Qu’est-ce qu’un “ ethnonyme ” ?
by: Philippe Erikson
Published: (2004-12-01)