Hemodynamic and Lesion Characteristics Associated with Discordance between the Instantaneous Wave-Free Ratio and Fractional Flow Reserve

Background. The instantaneous wave-free ratio (iFR) is an invasive coronary physiological index that is not inferior to fractional flow reserve- (FFR-) guided revascularization. The indexes of iFR and FFR are similar and closely correlated, but there are a few key differences. Previous studies sugge...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Hiroyuki Arashi, Natsuko Satomi, Issei Ishida, Kanintorn Soontorndhada, Suguru Ebihara, Kazuki Tanaka, Hisao Otsuki, Masashi Nakao, Kentaro Jujo, Junichi Yamaguchi, Nobuhisa Hagiwara
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Wiley 2019-01-01
Series:Journal of Interventional Cardiology
Online Access:http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2019/3765282
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
_version_ 1832550689362935808
author Hiroyuki Arashi
Natsuko Satomi
Issei Ishida
Kanintorn Soontorndhada
Suguru Ebihara
Kazuki Tanaka
Hisao Otsuki
Masashi Nakao
Kentaro Jujo
Junichi Yamaguchi
Nobuhisa Hagiwara
author_facet Hiroyuki Arashi
Natsuko Satomi
Issei Ishida
Kanintorn Soontorndhada
Suguru Ebihara
Kazuki Tanaka
Hisao Otsuki
Masashi Nakao
Kentaro Jujo
Junichi Yamaguchi
Nobuhisa Hagiwara
author_sort Hiroyuki Arashi
collection DOAJ
description Background. The instantaneous wave-free ratio (iFR) is an invasive coronary physiological index that is not inferior to fractional flow reserve- (FFR-) guided revascularization. The indexes of iFR and FFR are similar and closely correlated, but there are a few key differences. Previous studies suggested that patient characteristics and lesion severity could induce discordance between iFR and FFR. This study aimed to clarify the hemodynamics and lesion characteristics that influence discordance between iFR and FFR. Methods. In this retrospective study, we enrolled 225 patients (304 lesions) who underwent clinically indicated invasive coronary angiography and both iFR and FFR examinations between 2012 and 2017. We included only patients who underwent right heart catheterization and had blood pressure and heart rates recorded immediately prior to iFR and FFR. Results. Discordance (iFR ≤0.89 and FFR >0.8 or iFR >0.89 and FFR ≤0.8) was observed in 80 lesions (26.3%). The heart rate, rate-pressure product, and cardiac index tended to be higher in the iFR ≤0.89 group than in the iFR >0.89 group. These trends were not seen between the FFR ≤0.8 group and FFR >0.8 group. A multivariate analysis showed that independent predictors of iFR ≤0.89 and FFR >0.8 discordance were female sex and higher rate-pressure product. iFR >0.89 and FFR ≤0.8 discordance was rare in hemodialysis patients. Conclusion. Even if iFR is functionally significant in intermediate stenosis, additional FFR evaluations should be considered for women, especially those with a high rate-pressure product, to avoid unnecessary percutaneous coronary intervention. If iFR is not functionally significant with intermediate stenosis in hemodialysis patients, then further FFR evaluations are unnecessary.
format Article
id doaj-art-3f4f30c616d942d6bfdcdd1e57a8cbc9
institution Kabale University
issn 0896-4327
1540-8183
language English
publishDate 2019-01-01
publisher Wiley
record_format Article
series Journal of Interventional Cardiology
spelling doaj-art-3f4f30c616d942d6bfdcdd1e57a8cbc92025-02-03T06:06:07ZengWileyJournal of Interventional Cardiology0896-43271540-81832019-01-01201910.1155/2019/37652823765282Hemodynamic and Lesion Characteristics Associated with Discordance between the Instantaneous Wave-Free Ratio and Fractional Flow ReserveHiroyuki Arashi0Natsuko Satomi1Issei Ishida2Kanintorn Soontorndhada3Suguru Ebihara4Kazuki Tanaka5Hisao Otsuki6Masashi Nakao7Kentaro Jujo8Junichi Yamaguchi9Nobuhisa Hagiwara10Department of Cardiology, The Heart Institute of Japan, Tokyo Women’s Medical University, Tokyo, JapanDepartment of Cardiology, The Heart Institute of Japan, Tokyo Women’s Medical University, Tokyo, JapanDepartment of Cardiology, The Heart Institute of Japan, Tokyo Women’s Medical University, Tokyo, JapanDepartment of Cardiology, The Heart Institute of Japan, Tokyo Women’s Medical University, Tokyo, JapanDepartment of Cardiology, The Heart Institute of Japan, Tokyo Women’s Medical University, Tokyo, JapanDepartment of Cardiology, The Heart Institute of Japan, Tokyo Women’s Medical University, Tokyo, JapanDepartment of Cardiology, The Heart Institute of Japan, Tokyo Women’s Medical University, Tokyo, JapanDepartment of Cardiology, The Heart Institute of Japan, Tokyo Women’s Medical University, Tokyo, JapanDepartment of Cardiology, The Heart Institute of Japan, Tokyo Women’s Medical University, Tokyo, JapanDepartment of Cardiology, The Heart Institute of Japan, Tokyo Women’s Medical University, Tokyo, JapanDepartment of Cardiology, The Heart Institute of Japan, Tokyo Women’s Medical University, Tokyo, JapanBackground. The instantaneous wave-free ratio (iFR) is an invasive coronary physiological index that is not inferior to fractional flow reserve- (FFR-) guided revascularization. The indexes of iFR and FFR are similar and closely correlated, but there are a few key differences. Previous studies suggested that patient characteristics and lesion severity could induce discordance between iFR and FFR. This study aimed to clarify the hemodynamics and lesion characteristics that influence discordance between iFR and FFR. Methods. In this retrospective study, we enrolled 225 patients (304 lesions) who underwent clinically indicated invasive coronary angiography and both iFR and FFR examinations between 2012 and 2017. We included only patients who underwent right heart catheterization and had blood pressure and heart rates recorded immediately prior to iFR and FFR. Results. Discordance (iFR ≤0.89 and FFR >0.8 or iFR >0.89 and FFR ≤0.8) was observed in 80 lesions (26.3%). The heart rate, rate-pressure product, and cardiac index tended to be higher in the iFR ≤0.89 group than in the iFR >0.89 group. These trends were not seen between the FFR ≤0.8 group and FFR >0.8 group. A multivariate analysis showed that independent predictors of iFR ≤0.89 and FFR >0.8 discordance were female sex and higher rate-pressure product. iFR >0.89 and FFR ≤0.8 discordance was rare in hemodialysis patients. Conclusion. Even if iFR is functionally significant in intermediate stenosis, additional FFR evaluations should be considered for women, especially those with a high rate-pressure product, to avoid unnecessary percutaneous coronary intervention. If iFR is not functionally significant with intermediate stenosis in hemodialysis patients, then further FFR evaluations are unnecessary.http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2019/3765282
spellingShingle Hiroyuki Arashi
Natsuko Satomi
Issei Ishida
Kanintorn Soontorndhada
Suguru Ebihara
Kazuki Tanaka
Hisao Otsuki
Masashi Nakao
Kentaro Jujo
Junichi Yamaguchi
Nobuhisa Hagiwara
Hemodynamic and Lesion Characteristics Associated with Discordance between the Instantaneous Wave-Free Ratio and Fractional Flow Reserve
Journal of Interventional Cardiology
title Hemodynamic and Lesion Characteristics Associated with Discordance between the Instantaneous Wave-Free Ratio and Fractional Flow Reserve
title_full Hemodynamic and Lesion Characteristics Associated with Discordance between the Instantaneous Wave-Free Ratio and Fractional Flow Reserve
title_fullStr Hemodynamic and Lesion Characteristics Associated with Discordance between the Instantaneous Wave-Free Ratio and Fractional Flow Reserve
title_full_unstemmed Hemodynamic and Lesion Characteristics Associated with Discordance between the Instantaneous Wave-Free Ratio and Fractional Flow Reserve
title_short Hemodynamic and Lesion Characteristics Associated with Discordance between the Instantaneous Wave-Free Ratio and Fractional Flow Reserve
title_sort hemodynamic and lesion characteristics associated with discordance between the instantaneous wave free ratio and fractional flow reserve
url http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2019/3765282
work_keys_str_mv AT hiroyukiarashi hemodynamicandlesioncharacteristicsassociatedwithdiscordancebetweentheinstantaneouswavefreeratioandfractionalflowreserve
AT natsukosatomi hemodynamicandlesioncharacteristicsassociatedwithdiscordancebetweentheinstantaneouswavefreeratioandfractionalflowreserve
AT isseiishida hemodynamicandlesioncharacteristicsassociatedwithdiscordancebetweentheinstantaneouswavefreeratioandfractionalflowreserve
AT kanintornsoontorndhada hemodynamicandlesioncharacteristicsassociatedwithdiscordancebetweentheinstantaneouswavefreeratioandfractionalflowreserve
AT suguruebihara hemodynamicandlesioncharacteristicsassociatedwithdiscordancebetweentheinstantaneouswavefreeratioandfractionalflowreserve
AT kazukitanaka hemodynamicandlesioncharacteristicsassociatedwithdiscordancebetweentheinstantaneouswavefreeratioandfractionalflowreserve
AT hisaootsuki hemodynamicandlesioncharacteristicsassociatedwithdiscordancebetweentheinstantaneouswavefreeratioandfractionalflowreserve
AT masashinakao hemodynamicandlesioncharacteristicsassociatedwithdiscordancebetweentheinstantaneouswavefreeratioandfractionalflowreserve
AT kentarojujo hemodynamicandlesioncharacteristicsassociatedwithdiscordancebetweentheinstantaneouswavefreeratioandfractionalflowreserve
AT junichiyamaguchi hemodynamicandlesioncharacteristicsassociatedwithdiscordancebetweentheinstantaneouswavefreeratioandfractionalflowreserve
AT nobuhisahagiwara hemodynamicandlesioncharacteristicsassociatedwithdiscordancebetweentheinstantaneouswavefreeratioandfractionalflowreserve