In vitro comparison of the marginal adaptation of cold ceramic sealer with the single-cone obturation technique versus AH-26 sealer with the lateral compaction technique in single-canal teeth
Abstract Objectives This study aimed to compare the marginal adaptation of a cold ceramic (CC) sealer with the single-cone obturation technique with that of an AH-26 sealer with the lateral compaction technique in single-canal teeth. Materials and methods In this in vitro experimental study, the roo...
Saved in:
| Main Authors: | , , |
|---|---|
| Format: | Article |
| Language: | English |
| Published: |
BMC
2025-01-01
|
| Series: | BMC Oral Health |
| Subjects: | |
| Online Access: | https://doi.org/10.1186/s12903-024-05314-2 |
| Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
| _version_ | 1832594330293895168 |
|---|---|
| author | Jalil Modaresi Fatemeh Mokhtari Elahe Khodarahmi |
| author_facet | Jalil Modaresi Fatemeh Mokhtari Elahe Khodarahmi |
| author_sort | Jalil Modaresi |
| collection | DOAJ |
| description | Abstract Objectives This study aimed to compare the marginal adaptation of a cold ceramic (CC) sealer with the single-cone obturation technique with that of an AH-26 sealer with the lateral compaction technique in single-canal teeth. Materials and methods In this in vitro experimental study, the root canals of 24 extracted single-rooted single-canal teeth were instrumented to F3 files by the crown-down technique and randomly assigned to 2 groups (n = 12). The root canals were obturated with a CC sealer and single-cone obturation technique with 4% gutta-percha in group 1 and with an AH-26 sealer and lateral compaction technique with 2% gutta-percha in group 2. After 4 weeks of storage at room temperature and 100% humidity, the root ends were sectioned horizontally 3 mm from the apex, and the mean linear distance between the root filling material and the root dentinal wall was measured under a scanning electron microscope (SEM). Comparisons were made by the Mann‒Whitney test (alpha = 0.05). Results The mean linear distance (gap) was significantly smaller in the CC sealer/single-cone group than the AH-26/lateral compaction group (6.72 ± 2.57 vs. 12.94 ± 4.82 μm, P = 0.001). Conclusion Marginal adaptation was significantly higher with the CC sealer and single-cone obturation technique than with the AH-26/lateral compaction technique, suggesting the suitability of the CC sealer and single-cone obturation technique for a hermetic seal in single-canal teeth. |
| format | Article |
| id | doaj-art-3db46a94d18f4546b778188656a160d4 |
| institution | Kabale University |
| issn | 1472-6831 |
| language | English |
| publishDate | 2025-01-01 |
| publisher | BMC |
| record_format | Article |
| series | BMC Oral Health |
| spelling | doaj-art-3db46a94d18f4546b778188656a160d42025-01-19T12:41:27ZengBMCBMC Oral Health1472-68312025-01-012511810.1186/s12903-024-05314-2In vitro comparison of the marginal adaptation of cold ceramic sealer with the single-cone obturation technique versus AH-26 sealer with the lateral compaction technique in single-canal teethJalil Modaresi0Fatemeh Mokhtari1Elahe Khodarahmi2Department of Endodontics, School of Dentistry, Shahid Sadoughi University of Medical SciencesDepartment of Endodontics, School of Dentistry, Shahid Sadoughi University of Medical SciencesDepartment of Endodontics, School of Dentistry, Shahid Sadoughi University of Medical SciencesAbstract Objectives This study aimed to compare the marginal adaptation of a cold ceramic (CC) sealer with the single-cone obturation technique with that of an AH-26 sealer with the lateral compaction technique in single-canal teeth. Materials and methods In this in vitro experimental study, the root canals of 24 extracted single-rooted single-canal teeth were instrumented to F3 files by the crown-down technique and randomly assigned to 2 groups (n = 12). The root canals were obturated with a CC sealer and single-cone obturation technique with 4% gutta-percha in group 1 and with an AH-26 sealer and lateral compaction technique with 2% gutta-percha in group 2. After 4 weeks of storage at room temperature and 100% humidity, the root ends were sectioned horizontally 3 mm from the apex, and the mean linear distance between the root filling material and the root dentinal wall was measured under a scanning electron microscope (SEM). Comparisons were made by the Mann‒Whitney test (alpha = 0.05). Results The mean linear distance (gap) was significantly smaller in the CC sealer/single-cone group than the AH-26/lateral compaction group (6.72 ± 2.57 vs. 12.94 ± 4.82 μm, P = 0.001). Conclusion Marginal adaptation was significantly higher with the CC sealer and single-cone obturation technique than with the AH-26/lateral compaction technique, suggesting the suitability of the CC sealer and single-cone obturation technique for a hermetic seal in single-canal teeth.https://doi.org/10.1186/s12903-024-05314-2Epoxy Resin AH-26Dental marginal adaptationRoot Canal ObturationElectron scanning Microscopy |
| spellingShingle | Jalil Modaresi Fatemeh Mokhtari Elahe Khodarahmi In vitro comparison of the marginal adaptation of cold ceramic sealer with the single-cone obturation technique versus AH-26 sealer with the lateral compaction technique in single-canal teeth BMC Oral Health Epoxy Resin AH-26 Dental marginal adaptation Root Canal Obturation Electron scanning Microscopy |
| title | In vitro comparison of the marginal adaptation of cold ceramic sealer with the single-cone obturation technique versus AH-26 sealer with the lateral compaction technique in single-canal teeth |
| title_full | In vitro comparison of the marginal adaptation of cold ceramic sealer with the single-cone obturation technique versus AH-26 sealer with the lateral compaction technique in single-canal teeth |
| title_fullStr | In vitro comparison of the marginal adaptation of cold ceramic sealer with the single-cone obturation technique versus AH-26 sealer with the lateral compaction technique in single-canal teeth |
| title_full_unstemmed | In vitro comparison of the marginal adaptation of cold ceramic sealer with the single-cone obturation technique versus AH-26 sealer with the lateral compaction technique in single-canal teeth |
| title_short | In vitro comparison of the marginal adaptation of cold ceramic sealer with the single-cone obturation technique versus AH-26 sealer with the lateral compaction technique in single-canal teeth |
| title_sort | in vitro comparison of the marginal adaptation of cold ceramic sealer with the single cone obturation technique versus ah 26 sealer with the lateral compaction technique in single canal teeth |
| topic | Epoxy Resin AH-26 Dental marginal adaptation Root Canal Obturation Electron scanning Microscopy |
| url | https://doi.org/10.1186/s12903-024-05314-2 |
| work_keys_str_mv | AT jalilmodaresi invitrocomparisonofthemarginaladaptationofcoldceramicsealerwiththesingleconeobturationtechniqueversusah26sealerwiththelateralcompactiontechniqueinsinglecanalteeth AT fatemehmokhtari invitrocomparisonofthemarginaladaptationofcoldceramicsealerwiththesingleconeobturationtechniqueversusah26sealerwiththelateralcompactiontechniqueinsinglecanalteeth AT elahekhodarahmi invitrocomparisonofthemarginaladaptationofcoldceramicsealerwiththesingleconeobturationtechniqueversusah26sealerwiththelateralcompactiontechniqueinsinglecanalteeth |