Articular Cartilage Repair Using Marrow Stimulation Augmented with a Viable Chondral Allograft: 9-Month Postoperative Histological Evaluation
Marrow stimulation is frequently employed to treat focal chondral defects of the knee. However, marrow stimulation typically results in fibrocartilage repair tissue rather than healthy hyaline cartilage, which, over time, predisposes the repair to failure. Recently, a cryopreserved viable chondral a...
Saved in:
Main Authors: | , , |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
Wiley
2015-01-01
|
Series: | Case Reports in Orthopedics |
Online Access: | http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2015/617365 |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
_version_ | 1832552285852401664 |
---|---|
author | James K. Hoffman Sandra Geraghty Nicole M. Protzman |
author_facet | James K. Hoffman Sandra Geraghty Nicole M. Protzman |
author_sort | James K. Hoffman |
collection | DOAJ |
description | Marrow stimulation is frequently employed to treat focal chondral defects of the knee. However, marrow stimulation typically results in fibrocartilage repair tissue rather than healthy hyaline cartilage, which, over time, predisposes the repair to failure. Recently, a cryopreserved viable chondral allograft was developed to augment marrow stimulation. The chondral allograft is comprised of native viable chondrocytes, chondrogenic growth factors, and extracellular matrix proteins within the superficial, transitional, and radial zones of hyaline cartilage. Therefore, host mesenchymal stem cells that infiltrate the graft from the underlying bone marrow following marrow stimulation are provided with the optimal microenvironment to undergo chondrogenesis. The present report describes treatment of a trochlear defect with marrow stimulation augmented with this novel chondral allograft, along with nine month postoperative histological results. At nine months, the patient demonstrated complete resolution of pain and improvement in function, and the repair tissue consisted of 85% hyaline cartilage. For comparison, a biopsy obtained from a patient 8.2 months after treatment with marrow stimulation alone contained only 5% hyaline cartilage. These outcomes suggest that augmenting marrow stimulation with the viable chondral allograft can eliminate pain and improve outcomes, compared with marrow stimulation alone. |
format | Article |
id | doaj-art-3ce495dd5fd74464a35e10db6a221b68 |
institution | Kabale University |
issn | 2090-6749 2090-6757 |
language | English |
publishDate | 2015-01-01 |
publisher | Wiley |
record_format | Article |
series | Case Reports in Orthopedics |
spelling | doaj-art-3ce495dd5fd74464a35e10db6a221b682025-02-03T05:59:07ZengWileyCase Reports in Orthopedics2090-67492090-67572015-01-01201510.1155/2015/617365617365Articular Cartilage Repair Using Marrow Stimulation Augmented with a Viable Chondral Allograft: 9-Month Postoperative Histological EvaluationJames K. Hoffman0Sandra Geraghty1Nicole M. Protzman2Department of Orthopedics, Coordinated Health, 2775 Schoenersville Road, Bethlehem, PA 18017, USAProduct Development Department, Osiris Therapeutics, 7015 Einstein Drive, Columbia, MD 21046, USAClinical Education and Research Department, Coordinated Health, 3435 Winchester Road, Allentown, PA 18104, USAMarrow stimulation is frequently employed to treat focal chondral defects of the knee. However, marrow stimulation typically results in fibrocartilage repair tissue rather than healthy hyaline cartilage, which, over time, predisposes the repair to failure. Recently, a cryopreserved viable chondral allograft was developed to augment marrow stimulation. The chondral allograft is comprised of native viable chondrocytes, chondrogenic growth factors, and extracellular matrix proteins within the superficial, transitional, and radial zones of hyaline cartilage. Therefore, host mesenchymal stem cells that infiltrate the graft from the underlying bone marrow following marrow stimulation are provided with the optimal microenvironment to undergo chondrogenesis. The present report describes treatment of a trochlear defect with marrow stimulation augmented with this novel chondral allograft, along with nine month postoperative histological results. At nine months, the patient demonstrated complete resolution of pain and improvement in function, and the repair tissue consisted of 85% hyaline cartilage. For comparison, a biopsy obtained from a patient 8.2 months after treatment with marrow stimulation alone contained only 5% hyaline cartilage. These outcomes suggest that augmenting marrow stimulation with the viable chondral allograft can eliminate pain and improve outcomes, compared with marrow stimulation alone.http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2015/617365 |
spellingShingle | James K. Hoffman Sandra Geraghty Nicole M. Protzman Articular Cartilage Repair Using Marrow Stimulation Augmented with a Viable Chondral Allograft: 9-Month Postoperative Histological Evaluation Case Reports in Orthopedics |
title | Articular Cartilage Repair Using Marrow Stimulation Augmented with a Viable Chondral Allograft: 9-Month Postoperative Histological Evaluation |
title_full | Articular Cartilage Repair Using Marrow Stimulation Augmented with a Viable Chondral Allograft: 9-Month Postoperative Histological Evaluation |
title_fullStr | Articular Cartilage Repair Using Marrow Stimulation Augmented with a Viable Chondral Allograft: 9-Month Postoperative Histological Evaluation |
title_full_unstemmed | Articular Cartilage Repair Using Marrow Stimulation Augmented with a Viable Chondral Allograft: 9-Month Postoperative Histological Evaluation |
title_short | Articular Cartilage Repair Using Marrow Stimulation Augmented with a Viable Chondral Allograft: 9-Month Postoperative Histological Evaluation |
title_sort | articular cartilage repair using marrow stimulation augmented with a viable chondral allograft 9 month postoperative histological evaluation |
url | http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2015/617365 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT jameskhoffman articularcartilagerepairusingmarrowstimulationaugmentedwithaviablechondralallograft9monthpostoperativehistologicalevaluation AT sandrageraghty articularcartilagerepairusingmarrowstimulationaugmentedwithaviablechondralallograft9monthpostoperativehistologicalevaluation AT nicolemprotzman articularcartilagerepairusingmarrowstimulationaugmentedwithaviablechondralallograft9monthpostoperativehistologicalevaluation |