A Study on the Differences in Optimized Inputs of Various Data-Driven Methods for Battery Capacity Prediction
As lithium-ion batteries become increasingly popular worldwide, accurately determining their capacity is crucial for various devices that rely on them. Numerous data-driven methods have been applied to evaluate battery-related parameters. In the application of these methods, input features play a cr...
Saved in:
| Main Authors: | , , , |
|---|---|
| Format: | Article |
| Language: | English |
| Published: |
MDPI AG
2025-01-01
|
| Series: | Batteries |
| Subjects: | |
| Online Access: | https://www.mdpi.com/2313-0105/11/1/26 |
| Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
| _version_ | 1832589107276021760 |
|---|---|
| author | Kuo Xin Fu Jia Byoungik Choi Geesoo Lee |
| author_facet | Kuo Xin Fu Jia Byoungik Choi Geesoo Lee |
| author_sort | Kuo Xin |
| collection | DOAJ |
| description | As lithium-ion batteries become increasingly popular worldwide, accurately determining their capacity is crucial for various devices that rely on them. Numerous data-driven methods have been applied to evaluate battery-related parameters. In the application of these methods, input features play a critical role. Most researchers often use the same input features to compare the performance of various neural network models. However, because most models are regarded as black-box models, different methods may show different dependencies on specific features given the inherent differences in their internal structures. And the corresponding optimal inputs of different neural network models should be different. Therefore, comparing the differences in optimized input features for different neural networks is essential. This paper extracts 11 types of lithium battery-related health features, and experiments are conducted on two traditional machine learning networks and three advanced deep learning networks in three aspects of input differences. The experiment aims to systematically evaluate how changes in health feature types, dimensions, and data volume affect the performance of different methods and find the optimal input for each method. The results demonstrate that each network has its own optimal input in the aspects of health feature types, dimensions, and data volume. Moreover, under the premise of obtaining more accurate prediction accuracy, different networks have different requirements for input data. Therefore, in the process of using different types of neural networks for battery capacity prediction, it is very important to determine the type, dimension, and number of input health features according to the structure, category, and actual application requirements of the network. Different inputs will lead to larger differences in results. The optimization degree of mean absolute error (MAE) can be improved by 10–50%, and other indicators can also be optimized to varying degrees. Therefore, it is very important to optimize the network in a targeted manner. |
| format | Article |
| id | doaj-art-3c24cf9622a440429222cf6126ddb28c |
| institution | Kabale University |
| issn | 2313-0105 |
| language | English |
| publishDate | 2025-01-01 |
| publisher | MDPI AG |
| record_format | Article |
| series | Batteries |
| spelling | doaj-art-3c24cf9622a440429222cf6126ddb28c2025-01-24T13:22:27ZengMDPI AGBatteries2313-01052025-01-011112610.3390/batteries11010026A Study on the Differences in Optimized Inputs of Various Data-Driven Methods for Battery Capacity PredictionKuo Xin0Fu Jia1Byoungik Choi2Geesoo Lee3Department of Mechanical System Engineering, Tongmyong University, Busan 48520, Republic of KoreaDepartment of Mechanical System Engineering, Tongmyong University, Busan 48520, Republic of KoreaDepartment of Aerospace Engineering, Pusan National University, Busan 46241, Republic of KoreaDepartment of Automotive Engineering, Tongmyong University, Busan 48520, Republic of KoreaAs lithium-ion batteries become increasingly popular worldwide, accurately determining their capacity is crucial for various devices that rely on them. Numerous data-driven methods have been applied to evaluate battery-related parameters. In the application of these methods, input features play a critical role. Most researchers often use the same input features to compare the performance of various neural network models. However, because most models are regarded as black-box models, different methods may show different dependencies on specific features given the inherent differences in their internal structures. And the corresponding optimal inputs of different neural network models should be different. Therefore, comparing the differences in optimized input features for different neural networks is essential. This paper extracts 11 types of lithium battery-related health features, and experiments are conducted on two traditional machine learning networks and three advanced deep learning networks in three aspects of input differences. The experiment aims to systematically evaluate how changes in health feature types, dimensions, and data volume affect the performance of different methods and find the optimal input for each method. The results demonstrate that each network has its own optimal input in the aspects of health feature types, dimensions, and data volume. Moreover, under the premise of obtaining more accurate prediction accuracy, different networks have different requirements for input data. Therefore, in the process of using different types of neural networks for battery capacity prediction, it is very important to determine the type, dimension, and number of input health features according to the structure, category, and actual application requirements of the network. Different inputs will lead to larger differences in results. The optimization degree of mean absolute error (MAE) can be improved by 10–50%, and other indicators can also be optimized to varying degrees. Therefore, it is very important to optimize the network in a targeted manner.https://www.mdpi.com/2313-0105/11/1/26neural networksSVMPSO-BPCNNLSTMGRU |
| spellingShingle | Kuo Xin Fu Jia Byoungik Choi Geesoo Lee A Study on the Differences in Optimized Inputs of Various Data-Driven Methods for Battery Capacity Prediction Batteries neural networks SVM PSO-BP CNN LSTM GRU |
| title | A Study on the Differences in Optimized Inputs of Various Data-Driven Methods for Battery Capacity Prediction |
| title_full | A Study on the Differences in Optimized Inputs of Various Data-Driven Methods for Battery Capacity Prediction |
| title_fullStr | A Study on the Differences in Optimized Inputs of Various Data-Driven Methods for Battery Capacity Prediction |
| title_full_unstemmed | A Study on the Differences in Optimized Inputs of Various Data-Driven Methods for Battery Capacity Prediction |
| title_short | A Study on the Differences in Optimized Inputs of Various Data-Driven Methods for Battery Capacity Prediction |
| title_sort | study on the differences in optimized inputs of various data driven methods for battery capacity prediction |
| topic | neural networks SVM PSO-BP CNN LSTM GRU |
| url | https://www.mdpi.com/2313-0105/11/1/26 |
| work_keys_str_mv | AT kuoxin astudyonthedifferencesinoptimizedinputsofvariousdatadrivenmethodsforbatterycapacityprediction AT fujia astudyonthedifferencesinoptimizedinputsofvariousdatadrivenmethodsforbatterycapacityprediction AT byoungikchoi astudyonthedifferencesinoptimizedinputsofvariousdatadrivenmethodsforbatterycapacityprediction AT geesoolee astudyonthedifferencesinoptimizedinputsofvariousdatadrivenmethodsforbatterycapacityprediction AT kuoxin studyonthedifferencesinoptimizedinputsofvariousdatadrivenmethodsforbatterycapacityprediction AT fujia studyonthedifferencesinoptimizedinputsofvariousdatadrivenmethodsforbatterycapacityprediction AT byoungikchoi studyonthedifferencesinoptimizedinputsofvariousdatadrivenmethodsforbatterycapacityprediction AT geesoolee studyonthedifferencesinoptimizedinputsofvariousdatadrivenmethodsforbatterycapacityprediction |