INPRO Activities on Development of Advanced Tools to Support Judgment Aggregation for Comparative Evaluation of Nuclear Energy Systems
This paper presents first results of the INPRO Collaborative Project on Key Indicators for Innovative Nuclear Energy Systems, which has the objective to develop guidance and tools for comparative evaluation of the status, prospects, benefits, and risks associated with development of innovative nucle...
Saved in:
| Main Authors: | , , , |
|---|---|
| Format: | Article |
| Language: | English |
| Published: |
Wiley
2015-01-01
|
| Series: | Science and Technology of Nuclear Installations |
| Online Access: | http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2015/910162 |
| Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
| _version_ | 1832568347072397312 |
|---|---|
| author | V. Kuznetsov G. Fesenko A. Andrianov I. Kuptsov |
| author_facet | V. Kuznetsov G. Fesenko A. Andrianov I. Kuptsov |
| author_sort | V. Kuznetsov |
| collection | DOAJ |
| description | This paper presents first results of the INPRO Collaborative Project on Key Indicators for Innovative Nuclear Energy Systems, which has the objective to develop guidance and tools for comparative evaluation of the status, prospects, benefits, and risks associated with development of innovative nuclear technologies for a more distant future. Presented results illustrate expedience of application of the multicriteria decision analysis methods, which are able to provide the added value to comparative assessment of nuclear energy systems. First, the paper presents a short review of the multicriteria decision analysis methods appropriate to support judgment aggregation within comparative evaluations of nuclear energy systems based on key indicators and highlights the methodology to perform such assessments. Second, a set of key indicators elaborated in the INPRO Collaborative Project on Global Architecture of Innovative Nuclear Energy Systems Based on Thermal and Fast Reactors Including a Closed Fuel Cycle (GAINS) were evaluated for comparative evaluation of nuclear energy system evolution scenarios. Third, a numerical example is presented of application of the selected key indicators, methods, and tools for judgment aggregation in comparative assessment of the GAINS nuclear energy systems. |
| format | Article |
| id | doaj-art-3c232b5b7a0946a98d9f37ae0efc5347 |
| institution | Kabale University |
| issn | 1687-6075 1687-6083 |
| language | English |
| publishDate | 2015-01-01 |
| publisher | Wiley |
| record_format | Article |
| series | Science and Technology of Nuclear Installations |
| spelling | doaj-art-3c232b5b7a0946a98d9f37ae0efc53472025-02-03T00:59:10ZengWileyScience and Technology of Nuclear Installations1687-60751687-60832015-01-01201510.1155/2015/910162910162INPRO Activities on Development of Advanced Tools to Support Judgment Aggregation for Comparative Evaluation of Nuclear Energy SystemsV. Kuznetsov0G. Fesenko1A. Andrianov2I. Kuptsov3International Atomic Energy Agency, Wagramer Straße 5, P.O. Box 100, 1400 Vienna, AustriaInternational Atomic Energy Agency, Wagramer Straße 5, P.O. Box 100, 1400 Vienna, AustriaNational Research Nuclear University MEPhI (Moscow Engineering Physics Institute), Kashirskoe Shosse 31, Moscow 115409, RussiaNational Research Nuclear University MEPhI (Moscow Engineering Physics Institute), Kashirskoe Shosse 31, Moscow 115409, RussiaThis paper presents first results of the INPRO Collaborative Project on Key Indicators for Innovative Nuclear Energy Systems, which has the objective to develop guidance and tools for comparative evaluation of the status, prospects, benefits, and risks associated with development of innovative nuclear technologies for a more distant future. Presented results illustrate expedience of application of the multicriteria decision analysis methods, which are able to provide the added value to comparative assessment of nuclear energy systems. First, the paper presents a short review of the multicriteria decision analysis methods appropriate to support judgment aggregation within comparative evaluations of nuclear energy systems based on key indicators and highlights the methodology to perform such assessments. Second, a set of key indicators elaborated in the INPRO Collaborative Project on Global Architecture of Innovative Nuclear Energy Systems Based on Thermal and Fast Reactors Including a Closed Fuel Cycle (GAINS) were evaluated for comparative evaluation of nuclear energy system evolution scenarios. Third, a numerical example is presented of application of the selected key indicators, methods, and tools for judgment aggregation in comparative assessment of the GAINS nuclear energy systems.http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2015/910162 |
| spellingShingle | V. Kuznetsov G. Fesenko A. Andrianov I. Kuptsov INPRO Activities on Development of Advanced Tools to Support Judgment Aggregation for Comparative Evaluation of Nuclear Energy Systems Science and Technology of Nuclear Installations |
| title | INPRO Activities on Development of Advanced Tools to Support Judgment Aggregation for Comparative Evaluation of Nuclear Energy Systems |
| title_full | INPRO Activities on Development of Advanced Tools to Support Judgment Aggregation for Comparative Evaluation of Nuclear Energy Systems |
| title_fullStr | INPRO Activities on Development of Advanced Tools to Support Judgment Aggregation for Comparative Evaluation of Nuclear Energy Systems |
| title_full_unstemmed | INPRO Activities on Development of Advanced Tools to Support Judgment Aggregation for Comparative Evaluation of Nuclear Energy Systems |
| title_short | INPRO Activities on Development of Advanced Tools to Support Judgment Aggregation for Comparative Evaluation of Nuclear Energy Systems |
| title_sort | inpro activities on development of advanced tools to support judgment aggregation for comparative evaluation of nuclear energy systems |
| url | http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2015/910162 |
| work_keys_str_mv | AT vkuznetsov inproactivitiesondevelopmentofadvancedtoolstosupportjudgmentaggregationforcomparativeevaluationofnuclearenergysystems AT gfesenko inproactivitiesondevelopmentofadvancedtoolstosupportjudgmentaggregationforcomparativeevaluationofnuclearenergysystems AT aandrianov inproactivitiesondevelopmentofadvancedtoolstosupportjudgmentaggregationforcomparativeevaluationofnuclearenergysystems AT ikuptsov inproactivitiesondevelopmentofadvancedtoolstosupportjudgmentaggregationforcomparativeevaluationofnuclearenergysystems |