Outcomes of Infectious versus Sterile Perforated Corneal Ulcers after Therapeutic Penetrating Keratoplasty in the United States

Purpose. To compare the long-term outcomes of infectious versus sterile perforated corneal ulcers after therapeutic penetrating keratoplasty in the United States. Methods. The charts of 45 consecutive eyes that underwent primary therapeutic penetrating keratoplasty for a perforated corneal ulcer at...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Sloan W. Rush, Ryan B. Rush
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Wiley 2016-01-01
Series:Journal of Ophthalmology
Online Access:http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2016/6284595
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
_version_ 1832549987694673920
author Sloan W. Rush
Ryan B. Rush
author_facet Sloan W. Rush
Ryan B. Rush
author_sort Sloan W. Rush
collection DOAJ
description Purpose. To compare the long-term outcomes of infectious versus sterile perforated corneal ulcers after therapeutic penetrating keratoplasty in the United States. Methods. The charts of 45 consecutive eyes that underwent primary therapeutic penetrating keratoplasty for a perforated corneal ulcer at a single center were retrospectively reviewed. The perforated ulcers were classified as infectious or sterile and the underlying demographics, clinical features, and 36-month outcomes were compared among the two groups. Results. Mean follow-up among subjects was 38.6 (±6.9) months. Patients presenting with sterile perforated ulcers were more likely to have a peripheral perforation location (p=0.0333) and recurrence of the underlying disease condition (p=0.0321), require adjunctive surgical measures in the immediate postoperative period (p<0.0001), have reperforation after keratoplasty (p=0.0079), have worse best corrected visual acuity (p=0.0130), develop no light perception vision (p=0.0053), and require enucleation/evisceration (p=0.0252) when compared to the infectious perforated ulcer group. Conclusions. Sterile perforated corneal ulcers have a worse prognosis and may be more frequent than those caused by infectious disease in the United States compared to the developing world.
format Article
id doaj-art-3c05c4c7bc854f96bebce10e92b8f97f
institution Kabale University
issn 2090-004X
2090-0058
language English
publishDate 2016-01-01
publisher Wiley
record_format Article
series Journal of Ophthalmology
spelling doaj-art-3c05c4c7bc854f96bebce10e92b8f97f2025-02-03T06:08:00ZengWileyJournal of Ophthalmology2090-004X2090-00582016-01-01201610.1155/2016/62845956284595Outcomes of Infectious versus Sterile Perforated Corneal Ulcers after Therapeutic Penetrating Keratoplasty in the United StatesSloan W. Rush0Ryan B. Rush1Panhandle Eye Group, 7400 Fleming Ave., Amarillo, TX 79106, USAPanhandle Eye Group, 7400 Fleming Ave., Amarillo, TX 79106, USAPurpose. To compare the long-term outcomes of infectious versus sterile perforated corneal ulcers after therapeutic penetrating keratoplasty in the United States. Methods. The charts of 45 consecutive eyes that underwent primary therapeutic penetrating keratoplasty for a perforated corneal ulcer at a single center were retrospectively reviewed. The perforated ulcers were classified as infectious or sterile and the underlying demographics, clinical features, and 36-month outcomes were compared among the two groups. Results. Mean follow-up among subjects was 38.6 (±6.9) months. Patients presenting with sterile perforated ulcers were more likely to have a peripheral perforation location (p=0.0333) and recurrence of the underlying disease condition (p=0.0321), require adjunctive surgical measures in the immediate postoperative period (p<0.0001), have reperforation after keratoplasty (p=0.0079), have worse best corrected visual acuity (p=0.0130), develop no light perception vision (p=0.0053), and require enucleation/evisceration (p=0.0252) when compared to the infectious perforated ulcer group. Conclusions. Sterile perforated corneal ulcers have a worse prognosis and may be more frequent than those caused by infectious disease in the United States compared to the developing world.http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2016/6284595
spellingShingle Sloan W. Rush
Ryan B. Rush
Outcomes of Infectious versus Sterile Perforated Corneal Ulcers after Therapeutic Penetrating Keratoplasty in the United States
Journal of Ophthalmology
title Outcomes of Infectious versus Sterile Perforated Corneal Ulcers after Therapeutic Penetrating Keratoplasty in the United States
title_full Outcomes of Infectious versus Sterile Perforated Corneal Ulcers after Therapeutic Penetrating Keratoplasty in the United States
title_fullStr Outcomes of Infectious versus Sterile Perforated Corneal Ulcers after Therapeutic Penetrating Keratoplasty in the United States
title_full_unstemmed Outcomes of Infectious versus Sterile Perforated Corneal Ulcers after Therapeutic Penetrating Keratoplasty in the United States
title_short Outcomes of Infectious versus Sterile Perforated Corneal Ulcers after Therapeutic Penetrating Keratoplasty in the United States
title_sort outcomes of infectious versus sterile perforated corneal ulcers after therapeutic penetrating keratoplasty in the united states
url http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2016/6284595
work_keys_str_mv AT sloanwrush outcomesofinfectiousversussterileperforatedcornealulcersaftertherapeuticpenetratingkeratoplastyintheunitedstates
AT ryanbrush outcomesofinfectiousversussterileperforatedcornealulcersaftertherapeuticpenetratingkeratoplastyintheunitedstates