A Case of Pacemaker Endocarditis Caused by Aerococcus urinae

Background. Aerococcus urinae has lately been acknowledged as a cause of infective endocarditis (IE) especially in older males with underlying urinary tract disorders. In this population, cardiac implanted electronical devices (CIED) are not uncommon, but despite the capacity of A. urinae to form bi...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Sandra Samuelsson, Charles Kennergren, Magnus Rasmussen
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Wiley 2018-01-01
Series:Case Reports in Infectious Diseases
Online Access:http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2018/9128560
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
_version_ 1832551038217879552
author Sandra Samuelsson
Charles Kennergren
Magnus Rasmussen
author_facet Sandra Samuelsson
Charles Kennergren
Magnus Rasmussen
author_sort Sandra Samuelsson
collection DOAJ
description Background. Aerococcus urinae has lately been acknowledged as a cause of infective endocarditis (IE) especially in older males with underlying urinary tract disorders. In this population, cardiac implanted electronical devices (CIED) are not uncommon, but despite the capacity of A. urinae to form biofilm in vitro, no cases of aerococcal CIED infections have been reported to date. Case Presentation. An 84-year-old male with pacemaker was admitted with dysuria one month after a transurethral procedure for urinary bladder cancer. A. urinae was isolated from urine and blood. Transesophageal echocardiography (TEE) was without signs of vegetation on valves or pacing cables. The patient was treated with a twelve-day course of β-lactam antibiotics. Forty days after the initial admission, the patient was readmitted due to malaise, general pain of the joints, chills, and renewed blood cultures grew A. urinae. TEE demonstrated a 10 × 5 mm vegetation on either the tricuspid valve or one of the pacing cables. The pacemaker system was completely removed and demonstrated macroscopic signs of infection. A temporary system was implanted, and after 14 days of penicillin G treatment, a new system permanent system was implanted. Total treatment time was 40 days. Recovery was uneventful. Conclusion. This report demonstrates that A. urinae can cause CIED infection. In patients with A. urinae bacteremia and a CIED, this risk must be considered, especially if bacteremia reoccurs.
format Article
id doaj-art-3bfd1b10546a47579650442554f76d05
institution Kabale University
issn 2090-6625
2090-6633
language English
publishDate 2018-01-01
publisher Wiley
record_format Article
series Case Reports in Infectious Diseases
spelling doaj-art-3bfd1b10546a47579650442554f76d052025-02-03T06:05:10ZengWileyCase Reports in Infectious Diseases2090-66252090-66332018-01-01201810.1155/2018/91285609128560A Case of Pacemaker Endocarditis Caused by Aerococcus urinaeSandra Samuelsson0Charles Kennergren1Magnus Rasmussen2Department of Infectious Diseases, Hospital of Halland, Halmstad, SwedenDepartment of Cardiothoracic Surgery, Sahlgrenska University Hospital, Göteborg, SwedenDepartment of Clinical Sciences, Division of Infection Medicine, Lund University, Lund, SwedenBackground. Aerococcus urinae has lately been acknowledged as a cause of infective endocarditis (IE) especially in older males with underlying urinary tract disorders. In this population, cardiac implanted electronical devices (CIED) are not uncommon, but despite the capacity of A. urinae to form biofilm in vitro, no cases of aerococcal CIED infections have been reported to date. Case Presentation. An 84-year-old male with pacemaker was admitted with dysuria one month after a transurethral procedure for urinary bladder cancer. A. urinae was isolated from urine and blood. Transesophageal echocardiography (TEE) was without signs of vegetation on valves or pacing cables. The patient was treated with a twelve-day course of β-lactam antibiotics. Forty days after the initial admission, the patient was readmitted due to malaise, general pain of the joints, chills, and renewed blood cultures grew A. urinae. TEE demonstrated a 10 × 5 mm vegetation on either the tricuspid valve or one of the pacing cables. The pacemaker system was completely removed and demonstrated macroscopic signs of infection. A temporary system was implanted, and after 14 days of penicillin G treatment, a new system permanent system was implanted. Total treatment time was 40 days. Recovery was uneventful. Conclusion. This report demonstrates that A. urinae can cause CIED infection. In patients with A. urinae bacteremia and a CIED, this risk must be considered, especially if bacteremia reoccurs.http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2018/9128560
spellingShingle Sandra Samuelsson
Charles Kennergren
Magnus Rasmussen
A Case of Pacemaker Endocarditis Caused by Aerococcus urinae
Case Reports in Infectious Diseases
title A Case of Pacemaker Endocarditis Caused by Aerococcus urinae
title_full A Case of Pacemaker Endocarditis Caused by Aerococcus urinae
title_fullStr A Case of Pacemaker Endocarditis Caused by Aerococcus urinae
title_full_unstemmed A Case of Pacemaker Endocarditis Caused by Aerococcus urinae
title_short A Case of Pacemaker Endocarditis Caused by Aerococcus urinae
title_sort case of pacemaker endocarditis caused by aerococcus urinae
url http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2018/9128560
work_keys_str_mv AT sandrasamuelsson acaseofpacemakerendocarditiscausedbyaerococcusurinae
AT charleskennergren acaseofpacemakerendocarditiscausedbyaerococcusurinae
AT magnusrasmussen acaseofpacemakerendocarditiscausedbyaerococcusurinae
AT sandrasamuelsson caseofpacemakerendocarditiscausedbyaerococcusurinae
AT charleskennergren caseofpacemakerendocarditiscausedbyaerococcusurinae
AT magnusrasmussen caseofpacemakerendocarditiscausedbyaerococcusurinae