Evaluation of Lacrimal Punctal Changes by Anterior Segment Optical Coherence Tomography after Punctal Dilation Versus Punctal Plug Insertion in Cases of Inflammatory Punctual Stenosis

Purpose. To compare simple punctal dilation versus punctal dilation augmented by insertion of Punctal Plug Insertion (PPP) with assessing the effect on resolving epiphora and punctum size improvement by an objective method, high-resolution AS-OCT imaging comparing punctal parameters of the patients...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Islam Awny, Elshimaa A Mateen Mossa, Tasneem Mohammed Bakheet, Hany Mahmoud, Amr Mounir
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Wiley 2022-01-01
Series:Journal of Ophthalmology
Online Access:http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2022/7666323
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
_version_ 1832549020115927040
author Islam Awny
Elshimaa A Mateen Mossa
Tasneem Mohammed Bakheet
Hany Mahmoud
Amr Mounir
author_facet Islam Awny
Elshimaa A Mateen Mossa
Tasneem Mohammed Bakheet
Hany Mahmoud
Amr Mounir
author_sort Islam Awny
collection DOAJ
description Purpose. To compare simple punctal dilation versus punctal dilation augmented by insertion of Punctal Plug Insertion (PPP) with assessing the effect on resolving epiphora and punctum size improvement by an objective method, high-resolution AS-OCT imaging comparing punctal parameters of the patients before and after both techniques. Patients and Methods. It is a prospective, interventional, double-blinded controlled randomized study, which was conducted on two groups of patients, the first epiphora group (EG1 25 eyes), who had acquired punctal stenosis and epiphora and managed by simple punctal dilatation. The second epiphora group (EG2 20 eyes) who managed by punctal dilatation augmented with an application of perforated punctal plugs for two months. Spectral Domain Anterior Segment-OCT Image Acquisition. AS-OCT for lower puncti was performed using RTVue (Optovue Inc., Fermont, CA). OCT images of the width and length of the lower puncti of the participants were captured by the same operator on the same machine. Measuring of punctal size (diameter and length) was performed before treatment, one week, one month, and three months later objectively by using AS-OCT. Results. The study included 45 eyes of 50 subjects; the total coverage of epiphora patients fulfilled inclusion criteria and presented to the ophthalmology clinics of Sohag University Hospitals in the period between June 2021 and December 2021. Both groups were comparable regarding mean age (39 ± 11 vs 50 ± 12 years, P value = 0.4) and sex (males were 36% vs 40%, female were 64% vs 60%, P value = 0.5) respectively with no statistically significant difference between both groups. The mean duration of epiphora was measured in both groups before treatment (EG1 = 1.656 ± 0.41 months, EG2 = 1.73 ± 0.32 months) with no statistically significant difference (P value = 0.436). There was marked improvement of the outer punctual diameter and length between outer and inner puncti in EG1 (EG1 391um ± 122 um, EG2 692 ± 226 um (P value < 0.007) and EG1 189 ± 43 um, 380 ± 169 um (P value < 0.0002) during the follow-up period. EG2 showed more improvement than EG1 when compared during the follow-up period in both outer punctual diameter and length between outer and inner puncti with (P value < 0.003 and < 0.0002) in favor of EG2. However; both groups show improvement with the statistically significant difference in both groups by using AS-OCT. Conclusions. Punctal dilation augmented by insertion of PPP was an effective method in treating cases of inflammatory punctual stenosis as found by monitoring of punctal parameters changes by AS-OCT. AS-OCT was found a useful method for the evaluation of the lacrimal punctal parameters, especially with different treatment modalities in epiphora cases.
format Article
id doaj-art-3be7bb1eaf9e4ae0be552312481a3932
institution Kabale University
issn 2090-0058
language English
publishDate 2022-01-01
publisher Wiley
record_format Article
series Journal of Ophthalmology
spelling doaj-art-3be7bb1eaf9e4ae0be552312481a39322025-02-03T06:12:26ZengWileyJournal of Ophthalmology2090-00582022-01-01202210.1155/2022/7666323Evaluation of Lacrimal Punctal Changes by Anterior Segment Optical Coherence Tomography after Punctal Dilation Versus Punctal Plug Insertion in Cases of Inflammatory Punctual StenosisIslam Awny0Elshimaa A Mateen Mossa1Tasneem Mohammed Bakheet2Hany Mahmoud3Amr Mounir4Sohag Faculty of MedicineSohag Faculty of MedicineSohag Faculty of MedicineSohag Faculty of MedicineSohag Faculty of MedicinePurpose. To compare simple punctal dilation versus punctal dilation augmented by insertion of Punctal Plug Insertion (PPP) with assessing the effect on resolving epiphora and punctum size improvement by an objective method, high-resolution AS-OCT imaging comparing punctal parameters of the patients before and after both techniques. Patients and Methods. It is a prospective, interventional, double-blinded controlled randomized study, which was conducted on two groups of patients, the first epiphora group (EG1 25 eyes), who had acquired punctal stenosis and epiphora and managed by simple punctal dilatation. The second epiphora group (EG2 20 eyes) who managed by punctal dilatation augmented with an application of perforated punctal plugs for two months. Spectral Domain Anterior Segment-OCT Image Acquisition. AS-OCT for lower puncti was performed using RTVue (Optovue Inc., Fermont, CA). OCT images of the width and length of the lower puncti of the participants were captured by the same operator on the same machine. Measuring of punctal size (diameter and length) was performed before treatment, one week, one month, and three months later objectively by using AS-OCT. Results. The study included 45 eyes of 50 subjects; the total coverage of epiphora patients fulfilled inclusion criteria and presented to the ophthalmology clinics of Sohag University Hospitals in the period between June 2021 and December 2021. Both groups were comparable regarding mean age (39 ± 11 vs 50 ± 12 years, P value = 0.4) and sex (males were 36% vs 40%, female were 64% vs 60%, P value = 0.5) respectively with no statistically significant difference between both groups. The mean duration of epiphora was measured in both groups before treatment (EG1 = 1.656 ± 0.41 months, EG2 = 1.73 ± 0.32 months) with no statistically significant difference (P value = 0.436). There was marked improvement of the outer punctual diameter and length between outer and inner puncti in EG1 (EG1 391um ± 122 um, EG2 692 ± 226 um (P value < 0.007) and EG1 189 ± 43 um, 380 ± 169 um (P value < 0.0002) during the follow-up period. EG2 showed more improvement than EG1 when compared during the follow-up period in both outer punctual diameter and length between outer and inner puncti with (P value < 0.003 and < 0.0002) in favor of EG2. However; both groups show improvement with the statistically significant difference in both groups by using AS-OCT. Conclusions. Punctal dilation augmented by insertion of PPP was an effective method in treating cases of inflammatory punctual stenosis as found by monitoring of punctal parameters changes by AS-OCT. AS-OCT was found a useful method for the evaluation of the lacrimal punctal parameters, especially with different treatment modalities in epiphora cases.http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2022/7666323
spellingShingle Islam Awny
Elshimaa A Mateen Mossa
Tasneem Mohammed Bakheet
Hany Mahmoud
Amr Mounir
Evaluation of Lacrimal Punctal Changes by Anterior Segment Optical Coherence Tomography after Punctal Dilation Versus Punctal Plug Insertion in Cases of Inflammatory Punctual Stenosis
Journal of Ophthalmology
title Evaluation of Lacrimal Punctal Changes by Anterior Segment Optical Coherence Tomography after Punctal Dilation Versus Punctal Plug Insertion in Cases of Inflammatory Punctual Stenosis
title_full Evaluation of Lacrimal Punctal Changes by Anterior Segment Optical Coherence Tomography after Punctal Dilation Versus Punctal Plug Insertion in Cases of Inflammatory Punctual Stenosis
title_fullStr Evaluation of Lacrimal Punctal Changes by Anterior Segment Optical Coherence Tomography after Punctal Dilation Versus Punctal Plug Insertion in Cases of Inflammatory Punctual Stenosis
title_full_unstemmed Evaluation of Lacrimal Punctal Changes by Anterior Segment Optical Coherence Tomography after Punctal Dilation Versus Punctal Plug Insertion in Cases of Inflammatory Punctual Stenosis
title_short Evaluation of Lacrimal Punctal Changes by Anterior Segment Optical Coherence Tomography after Punctal Dilation Versus Punctal Plug Insertion in Cases of Inflammatory Punctual Stenosis
title_sort evaluation of lacrimal punctal changes by anterior segment optical coherence tomography after punctal dilation versus punctal plug insertion in cases of inflammatory punctual stenosis
url http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2022/7666323
work_keys_str_mv AT islamawny evaluationoflacrimalpunctalchangesbyanteriorsegmentopticalcoherencetomographyafterpunctaldilationversuspunctalpluginsertionincasesofinflammatorypunctualstenosis
AT elshimaaamateenmossa evaluationoflacrimalpunctalchangesbyanteriorsegmentopticalcoherencetomographyafterpunctaldilationversuspunctalpluginsertionincasesofinflammatorypunctualstenosis
AT tasneemmohammedbakheet evaluationoflacrimalpunctalchangesbyanteriorsegmentopticalcoherencetomographyafterpunctaldilationversuspunctalpluginsertionincasesofinflammatorypunctualstenosis
AT hanymahmoud evaluationoflacrimalpunctalchangesbyanteriorsegmentopticalcoherencetomographyafterpunctaldilationversuspunctalpluginsertionincasesofinflammatorypunctualstenosis
AT amrmounir evaluationoflacrimalpunctalchangesbyanteriorsegmentopticalcoherencetomographyafterpunctaldilationversuspunctalpluginsertionincasesofinflammatorypunctualstenosis