Comparative Study between Plastic and Metallic Stents for Biliary Decompression in Patients with Distal Biliary Obstruction

This paper presents a retrospective comparison of plastic versus metallic stents in the drainage of malignant distal biliary obstructions. We compared single plastic stents (SPS), multiple plastic stents (MPS), and metallic stents (SEMS) regarding clinical decrease of TB < 2.0 mg/dL, long-term pa...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: João Guilherme G. Cabral, Eloy Taglieri, Adriane Pelosof, Daniel Rosendo, José Celso Ardengh
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Wiley 2017-01-01
Series:Gastroenterology Research and Practice
Online Access:http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2017/7621821
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
_version_ 1832549225480585216
author João Guilherme G. Cabral
Eloy Taglieri
Adriane Pelosof
Daniel Rosendo
José Celso Ardengh
author_facet João Guilherme G. Cabral
Eloy Taglieri
Adriane Pelosof
Daniel Rosendo
José Celso Ardengh
author_sort João Guilherme G. Cabral
collection DOAJ
description This paper presents a retrospective comparison of plastic versus metallic stents in the drainage of malignant distal biliary obstructions. We compared single plastic stents (SPS), multiple plastic stents (MPS), and metallic stents (SEMS) regarding clinical decrease of TB < 2.0 mg/dL, long-term patency, and adverse event. 58 patients (38 women) with MDBO were included. Diagnoses were 44 pancreatic adenocarcinoma (74.6%), 9 metastasis (15.5%), 3 pancreatic neuroendocrine tumors (5.1%), and 2 adenocarcinoma in the major papilla (3.4%). The number of patients included in the SPS, MPS, and SEMS was 17, 6, and 35, respectively. Comparing the survival curves with respect to obstruction, we observed a lower mean permeability of the SPS compared to that of the MPS with p<0.003 and of the SEMS group (p<0.01). There was no statistical difference between the use of MPS, despite the small number of patients compared to the use of SEMS (p<0.13) to reach the satisfactory levels of bilirubin.
format Article
id doaj-art-3bd84611297c463cac17d027ed1f714e
institution Kabale University
issn 1687-6121
1687-630X
language English
publishDate 2017-01-01
publisher Wiley
record_format Article
series Gastroenterology Research and Practice
spelling doaj-art-3bd84611297c463cac17d027ed1f714e2025-02-03T06:11:44ZengWileyGastroenterology Research and Practice1687-61211687-630X2017-01-01201710.1155/2017/76218217621821Comparative Study between Plastic and Metallic Stents for Biliary Decompression in Patients with Distal Biliary ObstructionJoão Guilherme G. Cabral0Eloy Taglieri1Adriane Pelosof2Daniel Rosendo3José Celso Ardengh4Endoscopy Service of Hospital A. C. Camargo, São Paulo, SP, BrazilEndoscopy Service of Hospital A. C. Camargo, São Paulo, SP, BrazilEndoscopy Service of Hospital A. C. Camargo, São Paulo, SP, BrazilEndoscopy Service of Hospital A. C. Camargo, São Paulo, SP, BrazilEndoscopy Service of Hospital 9 de Julho, São Paulo, SP, BrazilThis paper presents a retrospective comparison of plastic versus metallic stents in the drainage of malignant distal biliary obstructions. We compared single plastic stents (SPS), multiple plastic stents (MPS), and metallic stents (SEMS) regarding clinical decrease of TB < 2.0 mg/dL, long-term patency, and adverse event. 58 patients (38 women) with MDBO were included. Diagnoses were 44 pancreatic adenocarcinoma (74.6%), 9 metastasis (15.5%), 3 pancreatic neuroendocrine tumors (5.1%), and 2 adenocarcinoma in the major papilla (3.4%). The number of patients included in the SPS, MPS, and SEMS was 17, 6, and 35, respectively. Comparing the survival curves with respect to obstruction, we observed a lower mean permeability of the SPS compared to that of the MPS with p<0.003 and of the SEMS group (p<0.01). There was no statistical difference between the use of MPS, despite the small number of patients compared to the use of SEMS (p<0.13) to reach the satisfactory levels of bilirubin.http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2017/7621821
spellingShingle João Guilherme G. Cabral
Eloy Taglieri
Adriane Pelosof
Daniel Rosendo
José Celso Ardengh
Comparative Study between Plastic and Metallic Stents for Biliary Decompression in Patients with Distal Biliary Obstruction
Gastroenterology Research and Practice
title Comparative Study between Plastic and Metallic Stents for Biliary Decompression in Patients with Distal Biliary Obstruction
title_full Comparative Study between Plastic and Metallic Stents for Biliary Decompression in Patients with Distal Biliary Obstruction
title_fullStr Comparative Study between Plastic and Metallic Stents for Biliary Decompression in Patients with Distal Biliary Obstruction
title_full_unstemmed Comparative Study between Plastic and Metallic Stents for Biliary Decompression in Patients with Distal Biliary Obstruction
title_short Comparative Study between Plastic and Metallic Stents for Biliary Decompression in Patients with Distal Biliary Obstruction
title_sort comparative study between plastic and metallic stents for biliary decompression in patients with distal biliary obstruction
url http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2017/7621821
work_keys_str_mv AT joaoguilhermegcabral comparativestudybetweenplasticandmetallicstentsforbiliarydecompressioninpatientswithdistalbiliaryobstruction
AT eloytaglieri comparativestudybetweenplasticandmetallicstentsforbiliarydecompressioninpatientswithdistalbiliaryobstruction
AT adrianepelosof comparativestudybetweenplasticandmetallicstentsforbiliarydecompressioninpatientswithdistalbiliaryobstruction
AT danielrosendo comparativestudybetweenplasticandmetallicstentsforbiliarydecompressioninpatientswithdistalbiliaryobstruction
AT josecelsoardengh comparativestudybetweenplasticandmetallicstentsforbiliarydecompressioninpatientswithdistalbiliaryobstruction