The History of Urinary Stones: In Parallel with Civilization
The roots of modern science and history of urinary stone disease go back to the Ancient Egyptians and Mesopotamia. Hippocrates defined the symptoms of bladder stones. The first recorded details of “perineal lithotomy” were those of Cornelius Celsus. Ancient Arabic medicine was based mainly on classi...
Saved in:
| Main Authors: | , |
|---|---|
| Format: | Article |
| Language: | English |
| Published: |
Wiley
2013-01-01
|
| Series: | The Scientific World Journal |
| Online Access: | http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2013/423964 |
| Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
| _version_ | 1832551104302284800 |
|---|---|
| author | Ahmet Tefekli Fatin Cezayirli |
| author_facet | Ahmet Tefekli Fatin Cezayirli |
| author_sort | Ahmet Tefekli |
| collection | DOAJ |
| description | The roots of modern science and history of urinary stone disease go back to the Ancient Egyptians and Mesopotamia. Hippocrates defined the symptoms of bladder stones. The first recorded details of “perineal lithotomy” were those of Cornelius Celsus. Ancient Arabic medicine was based mainly on classical Greco-Roman works. Interestingly, the Fourth Lateran Council in 1215 forbade physicians from performing surgical procedures, as contact with blood or body fluids was viewed as contaminating to men. With Renaissance new procedures could be tried on criminals. The first recorded suprapubic lithotomy was carried out by Pierre Franco in 1561. In 1874, Bigelow developed a lithotrite, which was introduced into the bladder under anaesthesia (called as “litholopaxy”). Young was the first to report ureteroscopy (1929). With advances in intracorporeal lithotripsy techniques, ureteroscopy became the treatment of choice for ureteric stones. In 1976, Fernstrom and Johannson established percutaneous access to remove a renal stone. However, with the introduction of the first extracorporeal shock wave machine in 1980, a dramatic change in stone management was observed. Civilization in parallel with scientific developments has brought us to a point where we try not to “cut” our patients for stone disease, as Hippocrates admonishes, but rather manage them with minimal invasive alternatives. |
| format | Article |
| id | doaj-art-3bb2c638375742198c46fe98b91fad4f |
| institution | Kabale University |
| issn | 1537-744X |
| language | English |
| publishDate | 2013-01-01 |
| publisher | Wiley |
| record_format | Article |
| series | The Scientific World Journal |
| spelling | doaj-art-3bb2c638375742198c46fe98b91fad4f2025-02-03T06:04:56ZengWileyThe Scientific World Journal1537-744X2013-01-01201310.1155/2013/423964423964The History of Urinary Stones: In Parallel with CivilizationAhmet Tefekli0Fatin Cezayirli1Department of Urology, Bahcesehir University School of Medicine, 34353 Istanbul, TurkeyDepartment of Urology, VKF American Hospital, 34365 Istanbul, TurkeyThe roots of modern science and history of urinary stone disease go back to the Ancient Egyptians and Mesopotamia. Hippocrates defined the symptoms of bladder stones. The first recorded details of “perineal lithotomy” were those of Cornelius Celsus. Ancient Arabic medicine was based mainly on classical Greco-Roman works. Interestingly, the Fourth Lateran Council in 1215 forbade physicians from performing surgical procedures, as contact with blood or body fluids was viewed as contaminating to men. With Renaissance new procedures could be tried on criminals. The first recorded suprapubic lithotomy was carried out by Pierre Franco in 1561. In 1874, Bigelow developed a lithotrite, which was introduced into the bladder under anaesthesia (called as “litholopaxy”). Young was the first to report ureteroscopy (1929). With advances in intracorporeal lithotripsy techniques, ureteroscopy became the treatment of choice for ureteric stones. In 1976, Fernstrom and Johannson established percutaneous access to remove a renal stone. However, with the introduction of the first extracorporeal shock wave machine in 1980, a dramatic change in stone management was observed. Civilization in parallel with scientific developments has brought us to a point where we try not to “cut” our patients for stone disease, as Hippocrates admonishes, but rather manage them with minimal invasive alternatives.http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2013/423964 |
| spellingShingle | Ahmet Tefekli Fatin Cezayirli The History of Urinary Stones: In Parallel with Civilization The Scientific World Journal |
| title | The History of Urinary Stones: In Parallel with Civilization |
| title_full | The History of Urinary Stones: In Parallel with Civilization |
| title_fullStr | The History of Urinary Stones: In Parallel with Civilization |
| title_full_unstemmed | The History of Urinary Stones: In Parallel with Civilization |
| title_short | The History of Urinary Stones: In Parallel with Civilization |
| title_sort | history of urinary stones in parallel with civilization |
| url | http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2013/423964 |
| work_keys_str_mv | AT ahmettefekli thehistoryofurinarystonesinparallelwithcivilization AT fatincezayirli thehistoryofurinarystonesinparallelwithcivilization AT ahmettefekli historyofurinarystonesinparallelwithcivilization AT fatincezayirli historyofurinarystonesinparallelwithcivilization |