Lenvatinib and tislelizumab versus atezolizumab and bevacizumab in combination with TAE-HAIC for unresectable hepatocellular carcinoma with high tumor burden: a multicenter retrospective cohort study

Abstract Background Systemic and locoregional combination therapy has demonstrated promising outcomes for unresectable hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC); However, the best combination option remains unknown. This study compared the efficacy and safety of lenvatinib and tislelizumab versus atezolizumab...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Hongjie Cai, Song Chen, Shuangyan Tang, Yi Xiao, Feng Shi, Zhiqiang Wu, Ping Ma, Huanwei Chen, Wenquan Zhuang, Wenbo Guo
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Springer 2025-02-01
Series:Cancer Immunology, Immunotherapy
Subjects:
Online Access:https://doi.org/10.1007/s00262-025-03942-3
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
_version_ 1832571645333602304
author Hongjie Cai
Song Chen
Shuangyan Tang
Yi Xiao
Feng Shi
Zhiqiang Wu
Ping Ma
Huanwei Chen
Wenquan Zhuang
Wenbo Guo
author_facet Hongjie Cai
Song Chen
Shuangyan Tang
Yi Xiao
Feng Shi
Zhiqiang Wu
Ping Ma
Huanwei Chen
Wenquan Zhuang
Wenbo Guo
author_sort Hongjie Cai
collection DOAJ
description Abstract Background Systemic and locoregional combination therapy has demonstrated promising outcomes for unresectable hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC); However, the best combination option remains unknown. This study compared the efficacy and safety of lenvatinib and tislelizumab versus atezolizumab and bevacizumab in combination with transarterial embolization (TAE) plus hepatic artery infusion chemotherapy (HAIC) for unresectable HCC with high tumor burden. Methods This multicenter retrospective cohort study enrolled treatment-naive patients with unresectable HCC treated with TAE-HAIC plus lenvatinib and tislelizumab (THLP group) or TAE-HAIC plus atezolizumab and bevacizumab (THTA group). The primary endpoint was overall survival (OS). Secondary endpoints included progression-free survival (PFS), tumor response, and adverse events (AEs). Propensity score matching (PSM) was performed to reduce bias. Results Of the 240 patients enrolled, 153 and 51 patients were assigned to the THLP and THTA groups, respectively after PSM (3:1). The THLP group showed a longer median OS (22 months vs. 18.2 months; P = 0.412), whereas the median PFS was longer in the THTA group (8.1 months vs. 7 months; P = 0.723), with statistically insignificant intergroup differences. No statistical differences were observed in objective response rate (RECIST 1.1: 33.9 vs. 31.4%; mRECIST: 77.1% vs. 74.5%; P = 0.635), disease control rate (RECIST 1.1: 88.9% vs. 92.2; mRECIST: 92.2% vs. 94.1%; P = 0.716), and in grade 3/4 AEs. Gastrointestinal hemorrhage rate was significantly higher in the THTA group (9.1% vs. 1.6%; P = 0.007). All AEs were controllable and no treatment-related grade 5 AEs occurred. Conclusions TAE-HAIC plus lenvatinib and tislelizumab or TAE-HAIC plus atezolizumab and bevacizumab showed similar outcomes for unresectable HCC with high tumor burden, and manageable safety. The results need further validation.
format Article
id doaj-art-3b1173b7b71e45c3b8538d63a3b34927
institution Kabale University
issn 1432-0851
language English
publishDate 2025-02-01
publisher Springer
record_format Article
series Cancer Immunology, Immunotherapy
spelling doaj-art-3b1173b7b71e45c3b8538d63a3b349272025-02-02T12:26:21ZengSpringerCancer Immunology, Immunotherapy1432-08512025-02-0174311210.1007/s00262-025-03942-3Lenvatinib and tislelizumab versus atezolizumab and bevacizumab in combination with TAE-HAIC for unresectable hepatocellular carcinoma with high tumor burden: a multicenter retrospective cohort studyHongjie Cai0Song Chen1Shuangyan Tang2Yi Xiao3Feng Shi4Zhiqiang Wu5Ping Ma6Huanwei Chen7Wenquan Zhuang8Wenbo Guo9Department of Interventional Radiology, The First Affiliated Hospital of Sun Yat-Sen UniversityDepartment of Minimally Invasive Interventional Therapy, State Key Laboratory of Oncology in South China, Guangdong Provincial Clinical Research Center for Cancer, Sun Yat-Sen University Cancer CenterDepartment of Radiology, The Eighth Affiliated Hospital of Sun Yat-Sen UniversityCenter of Hepato-Pancreato-Biliary Surgery, The First Affiliated Hospital of Sun Yat-Sen UniversityDepartment of Interventional Radiology, Guangdong Provincial People’s HospitalDepartment of Interventional Radiology, The First Affiliated Hospital of Sun Yat-Sen UniversityDepartment of Oncology, The Twelfth People’s Hospital of GuangzhouDepartment of Hepatopancreatic Surgery, The First People’s Hospital of FoshanDepartment of Interventional Radiology, The First Affiliated Hospital of Sun Yat-Sen UniversityDepartment of Interventional Radiology, The First Affiliated Hospital of Sun Yat-Sen UniversityAbstract Background Systemic and locoregional combination therapy has demonstrated promising outcomes for unresectable hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC); However, the best combination option remains unknown. This study compared the efficacy and safety of lenvatinib and tislelizumab versus atezolizumab and bevacizumab in combination with transarterial embolization (TAE) plus hepatic artery infusion chemotherapy (HAIC) for unresectable HCC with high tumor burden. Methods This multicenter retrospective cohort study enrolled treatment-naive patients with unresectable HCC treated with TAE-HAIC plus lenvatinib and tislelizumab (THLP group) or TAE-HAIC plus atezolizumab and bevacizumab (THTA group). The primary endpoint was overall survival (OS). Secondary endpoints included progression-free survival (PFS), tumor response, and adverse events (AEs). Propensity score matching (PSM) was performed to reduce bias. Results Of the 240 patients enrolled, 153 and 51 patients were assigned to the THLP and THTA groups, respectively after PSM (3:1). The THLP group showed a longer median OS (22 months vs. 18.2 months; P = 0.412), whereas the median PFS was longer in the THTA group (8.1 months vs. 7 months; P = 0.723), with statistically insignificant intergroup differences. No statistical differences were observed in objective response rate (RECIST 1.1: 33.9 vs. 31.4%; mRECIST: 77.1% vs. 74.5%; P = 0.635), disease control rate (RECIST 1.1: 88.9% vs. 92.2; mRECIST: 92.2% vs. 94.1%; P = 0.716), and in grade 3/4 AEs. Gastrointestinal hemorrhage rate was significantly higher in the THTA group (9.1% vs. 1.6%; P = 0.007). All AEs were controllable and no treatment-related grade 5 AEs occurred. Conclusions TAE-HAIC plus lenvatinib and tislelizumab or TAE-HAIC plus atezolizumab and bevacizumab showed similar outcomes for unresectable HCC with high tumor burden, and manageable safety. The results need further validation.https://doi.org/10.1007/s00262-025-03942-3Combination therapyHepatic artery infusion chemotherapyHepatocellular carcinomaSystemic therapyTransarterial embolization
spellingShingle Hongjie Cai
Song Chen
Shuangyan Tang
Yi Xiao
Feng Shi
Zhiqiang Wu
Ping Ma
Huanwei Chen
Wenquan Zhuang
Wenbo Guo
Lenvatinib and tislelizumab versus atezolizumab and bevacizumab in combination with TAE-HAIC for unresectable hepatocellular carcinoma with high tumor burden: a multicenter retrospective cohort study
Cancer Immunology, Immunotherapy
Combination therapy
Hepatic artery infusion chemotherapy
Hepatocellular carcinoma
Systemic therapy
Transarterial embolization
title Lenvatinib and tislelizumab versus atezolizumab and bevacizumab in combination with TAE-HAIC for unresectable hepatocellular carcinoma with high tumor burden: a multicenter retrospective cohort study
title_full Lenvatinib and tislelizumab versus atezolizumab and bevacizumab in combination with TAE-HAIC for unresectable hepatocellular carcinoma with high tumor burden: a multicenter retrospective cohort study
title_fullStr Lenvatinib and tislelizumab versus atezolizumab and bevacizumab in combination with TAE-HAIC for unresectable hepatocellular carcinoma with high tumor burden: a multicenter retrospective cohort study
title_full_unstemmed Lenvatinib and tislelizumab versus atezolizumab and bevacizumab in combination with TAE-HAIC for unresectable hepatocellular carcinoma with high tumor burden: a multicenter retrospective cohort study
title_short Lenvatinib and tislelizumab versus atezolizumab and bevacizumab in combination with TAE-HAIC for unresectable hepatocellular carcinoma with high tumor burden: a multicenter retrospective cohort study
title_sort lenvatinib and tislelizumab versus atezolizumab and bevacizumab in combination with tae haic for unresectable hepatocellular carcinoma with high tumor burden a multicenter retrospective cohort study
topic Combination therapy
Hepatic artery infusion chemotherapy
Hepatocellular carcinoma
Systemic therapy
Transarterial embolization
url https://doi.org/10.1007/s00262-025-03942-3
work_keys_str_mv AT hongjiecai lenvatinibandtislelizumabversusatezolizumabandbevacizumabincombinationwithtaehaicforunresectablehepatocellularcarcinomawithhightumorburdenamulticenterretrospectivecohortstudy
AT songchen lenvatinibandtislelizumabversusatezolizumabandbevacizumabincombinationwithtaehaicforunresectablehepatocellularcarcinomawithhightumorburdenamulticenterretrospectivecohortstudy
AT shuangyantang lenvatinibandtislelizumabversusatezolizumabandbevacizumabincombinationwithtaehaicforunresectablehepatocellularcarcinomawithhightumorburdenamulticenterretrospectivecohortstudy
AT yixiao lenvatinibandtislelizumabversusatezolizumabandbevacizumabincombinationwithtaehaicforunresectablehepatocellularcarcinomawithhightumorburdenamulticenterretrospectivecohortstudy
AT fengshi lenvatinibandtislelizumabversusatezolizumabandbevacizumabincombinationwithtaehaicforunresectablehepatocellularcarcinomawithhightumorburdenamulticenterretrospectivecohortstudy
AT zhiqiangwu lenvatinibandtislelizumabversusatezolizumabandbevacizumabincombinationwithtaehaicforunresectablehepatocellularcarcinomawithhightumorburdenamulticenterretrospectivecohortstudy
AT pingma lenvatinibandtislelizumabversusatezolizumabandbevacizumabincombinationwithtaehaicforunresectablehepatocellularcarcinomawithhightumorburdenamulticenterretrospectivecohortstudy
AT huanweichen lenvatinibandtislelizumabversusatezolizumabandbevacizumabincombinationwithtaehaicforunresectablehepatocellularcarcinomawithhightumorburdenamulticenterretrospectivecohortstudy
AT wenquanzhuang lenvatinibandtislelizumabversusatezolizumabandbevacizumabincombinationwithtaehaicforunresectablehepatocellularcarcinomawithhightumorburdenamulticenterretrospectivecohortstudy
AT wenboguo lenvatinibandtislelizumabversusatezolizumabandbevacizumabincombinationwithtaehaicforunresectablehepatocellularcarcinomawithhightumorburdenamulticenterretrospectivecohortstudy