Salient and contested scientific evidence in debates over sustainable transformation: pesticide policymaking in Switzerland
Abstract Research indicates that the increased use of scientific evidence is an important lever for transforming policy toward sustainability goals. We explore how actors use scientific evidence in contests over policy transformation in the agri-food sector. Theoretically, we build on prior research...
Saved in:
| Main Authors: | Oliver Truffer, Benjamin Hofmann, Eva Lieberherr |
|---|---|
| Format: | Article |
| Language: | English |
| Published: |
Springer Nature
2025-07-01
|
| Series: | Humanities & Social Sciences Communications |
| Online Access: | https://doi.org/10.1057/s41599-025-05159-2 |
| Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
Similar Items
-
Contested meanings of inclusiveness, accountability and transparency in trade policymaking
by: Jeremy Malcolm
Published: (2017-12-01) -
Three reasons why food system transformations are contested, and why food system scientists and policymakers should care
by: Ola T. Westengen, et al.
Published: (2025-05-01) -
Debating childfree: The contestation of “childfree” discourses in Instagram
by: Mashita Phitaloka Fandia Purwaningtyas, et al.
Published: (2025-03-01) -
Science-policy: UNFCCC policymakers’ perspective of scientific scenarios and their policy relevance
by: Jiesper Tristan Strandsbjerg Pedersen, et al.
Published: (2025-05-01) -
Universal Basic Income: Ideological Debate and Evidence from Iran, Alaska, and Switzerland
by: Yuval Rymon
Published: (2025-05-01)