Wittgenstein Versus Hume: The IS-OUGHT Problem – Finally Solved
This paper shows that Wittgenstein’s situational approach applied to Hume’s is-ought problem leads to the conclusion that this famous Hume thesis is false both in its original version (lack of logical value of deontic sentences) and in its modern understanding (logical separation of deontic sentence...
Saved in:
Main Author: | Malec Andrzej |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
Sciendo
2024-12-01
|
Series: | Studies in Logic, Grammar and Rhetoric |
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | https://doi.org/10.2478/slgr-2024-0019 |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
Similar Items
-
Russell and Wittgenstein: apprenticeship and other ‘crossings’
by: V. V. Tselishchev
Published: (2022-12-01) -
MATEMATİKSEL (?) MANTIK
by: İskender Taşdelen
Published: (2009-07-01) -
NECATİ ÖNER’İN MANTIK FELSEFESİ VE MANTIK İLKELERİNE YAKLAŞIMI
by: Mehmet Nasih İnce
Published: (2019-07-01) -
How is Logical Analysis Viable?
by: Arman Besler
Published: (2024-12-01) -
Wittgenstein and metamorphoses of legal language
by: A. B. Didikin
Published: (2020-05-01)