The Best Constitution for the Flourishing Lives: Aristotle’s Political Theory and Its Implications for Emancipatory Purposes
The aim of this paper is to discuss the issue of the best constitution given Aristotle’s account of human flourishing articulated in the Nicomachean Ethics. There, Aristotle claims that monarchy is the supreme form of constitution. A similar claim is repeated in Politics. The paper argues that thes...
Saved in:
| Main Author: | |
|---|---|
| Format: | Article |
| Language: | English |
| Published: |
Vilnius University Press
2023-10-01
|
| Series: | Problemos |
| Subjects: | |
| Online Access: | https://www.journals.vu.lt/problemos/article/view/33378 |
| Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
| _version_ | 1832593058694168576 |
|---|---|
| author | Andrius Bielskis |
| author_facet | Andrius Bielskis |
| author_sort | Andrius Bielskis |
| collection | DOAJ |
| description |
The aim of this paper is to discuss the issue of the best constitution given Aristotle’s account of human flourishing articulated in the Nicomachean Ethics. There, Aristotle claims that monarchy is the supreme form of constitution. A similar claim is repeated in Politics. The paper argues that these claims sit uneasily with Aristotle’s teleological accounts of the polis, the citizen, and his discussion of the virtues of the citizen and the good man in Politics. Given Aristotle’s philosophical definition of the state as “an association of equals for the sake of the best possible life” and his notion that “the best is happiness, and that consists in excellence and its perfect actualization and its employment”, and Aristotle’s argument on the relationship between the good man and the good citizen, this paper concludes that the best constitution is politeia. Yet, simply to argue so is not enough if we are to rescue Aristotle from his inconsistencies and his claims on “natural inequalities”. Finally, a more radical interpretation of Aristotle is outlined, which rejects Aristotle’s separation between the oikos and the polis and argues that the verticality of the former is philosophically arbitrary and contradicts the revolutionary implications of Aristotle’s normative teleology.
|
| format | Article |
| id | doaj-art-3a835e67378747f0809842237f7e5861 |
| institution | Kabale University |
| issn | 1392-1126 2424-6158 |
| language | English |
| publishDate | 2023-10-01 |
| publisher | Vilnius University Press |
| record_format | Article |
| series | Problemos |
| spelling | doaj-art-3a835e67378747f0809842237f7e58612025-01-20T18:24:31ZengVilnius University PressProblemos1392-11262424-61582023-10-0110410.15388/Problemos.2023.104.7The Best Constitution for the Flourishing Lives: Aristotle’s Political Theory and Its Implications for Emancipatory PurposesAndrius Bielskis0Centre for Aristotelian Studies and Critical Theory, Mykolas Romeris University, Lithuania; Kaunas University of Technology, Lithuania The aim of this paper is to discuss the issue of the best constitution given Aristotle’s account of human flourishing articulated in the Nicomachean Ethics. There, Aristotle claims that monarchy is the supreme form of constitution. A similar claim is repeated in Politics. The paper argues that these claims sit uneasily with Aristotle’s teleological accounts of the polis, the citizen, and his discussion of the virtues of the citizen and the good man in Politics. Given Aristotle’s philosophical definition of the state as “an association of equals for the sake of the best possible life” and his notion that “the best is happiness, and that consists in excellence and its perfect actualization and its employment”, and Aristotle’s argument on the relationship between the good man and the good citizen, this paper concludes that the best constitution is politeia. Yet, simply to argue so is not enough if we are to rescue Aristotle from his inconsistencies and his claims on “natural inequalities”. Finally, a more radical interpretation of Aristotle is outlined, which rejects Aristotle’s separation between the oikos and the polis and argues that the verticality of the former is philosophically arbitrary and contradicts the revolutionary implications of Aristotle’s normative teleology. https://www.journals.vu.lt/problemos/article/view/33378Aristotlehuman flourishingpoliteiathe best polisexcellence (aretē)citizen |
| spellingShingle | Andrius Bielskis The Best Constitution for the Flourishing Lives: Aristotle’s Political Theory and Its Implications for Emancipatory Purposes Problemos Aristotle human flourishing politeia the best polis excellence (aretē) citizen |
| title | The Best Constitution for the Flourishing Lives: Aristotle’s Political Theory and Its Implications for Emancipatory Purposes |
| title_full | The Best Constitution for the Flourishing Lives: Aristotle’s Political Theory and Its Implications for Emancipatory Purposes |
| title_fullStr | The Best Constitution for the Flourishing Lives: Aristotle’s Political Theory and Its Implications for Emancipatory Purposes |
| title_full_unstemmed | The Best Constitution for the Flourishing Lives: Aristotle’s Political Theory and Its Implications for Emancipatory Purposes |
| title_short | The Best Constitution for the Flourishing Lives: Aristotle’s Political Theory and Its Implications for Emancipatory Purposes |
| title_sort | best constitution for the flourishing lives aristotle s political theory and its implications for emancipatory purposes |
| topic | Aristotle human flourishing politeia the best polis excellence (aretē) citizen |
| url | https://www.journals.vu.lt/problemos/article/view/33378 |
| work_keys_str_mv | AT andriusbielskis thebestconstitutionfortheflourishinglivesaristotlespoliticaltheoryanditsimplicationsforemancipatorypurposes AT andriusbielskis bestconstitutionfortheflourishinglivesaristotlespoliticaltheoryanditsimplicationsforemancipatorypurposes |