MSDP-Net: A Multi-Scale Domain Perception Network for HRRP Target Recognition
High-resolution range profile (HRRP) recognition serves as a foundational task in radar automatic target recognition (RATR), enabling robust classification under all-day and all-weather conditions. However, existing approaches often struggle to simultaneously capture the multi-scale spatial dependen...
Saved in:
| Main Authors: | , , , , |
|---|---|
| Format: | Article |
| Language: | English |
| Published: |
MDPI AG
2025-07-01
|
| Series: | Remote Sensing |
| Subjects: | |
| Online Access: | https://www.mdpi.com/2072-4292/17/15/2601 |
| Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
| Summary: | High-resolution range profile (HRRP) recognition serves as a foundational task in radar automatic target recognition (RATR), enabling robust classification under all-day and all-weather conditions. However, existing approaches often struggle to simultaneously capture the multi-scale spatial dependencies and global spectral relationships inherent in HRRP signals, limiting their effectiveness in complex scenarios. To address these limitations, we propose a novel multi-scale domain perception network tailored for HRRP-based target recognition, called MSDP-Net. MSDP-Net introduces a hybrid spatial–spectral representation learning strategy through a multiple-domain perception HRRP (DP-HRRP) encoder, which integrates multi-head convolutions to extract spatial features across diverse receptive fields, and frequency-aware filtering to enhance critical spectral components. To further enhance feature fusion, we design a hierarchical scale fusion (HSF) branch that employs stacked semantically enhanced scale fusion (SESF) blocks to progressively aggregate information from fine to coarse scales in a bottom-up manner. This architecture enables MSDP-Net to effectively model complex scattering patterns and aspect-dependent variations. Extensive experiments on both simulated and measured datasets demonstrate the superiority of MSDP-Net, achieving 80.75% accuracy on the simulated dataset and 94.42% on the measured dataset, highlighting its robustness and practical applicability. |
|---|---|
| ISSN: | 2072-4292 |