Comparative evaluation of high-flow nasal cannula (HFNC) and conventional oxygen therapy (COT) in infants after non-cardiac surgery: Study protocol of a randomized controlled trial.

<h4>Background</h4>Literature regarding the advantages of HFNC in infants for ensuring oxygen supply after non-cardiac surgery is insufficient. The purpose of our study is to compare COT vs. HFNC on postoperative outcomes in infants undergoing non-cardiac surgery. We hypothesize that pro...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Diwei Zhang, Tianqing Gong, Qinghua Huang, Qianqian Zhang, Kai Liu, Jia Li, Hai Yu, Yu Cui
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Public Library of Science (PLoS) 2025-01-01
Series:PLoS ONE
Online Access:https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0314782
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
_version_ 1832582938510753792
author Diwei Zhang
Tianqing Gong
Qinghua Huang
Qianqian Zhang
Kai Liu
Jia Li
Hai Yu
Yu Cui
author_facet Diwei Zhang
Tianqing Gong
Qinghua Huang
Qianqian Zhang
Kai Liu
Jia Li
Hai Yu
Yu Cui
author_sort Diwei Zhang
collection DOAJ
description <h4>Background</h4>Literature regarding the advantages of HFNC in infants for ensuring oxygen supply after non-cardiac surgery is insufficient. The purpose of our study is to compare COT vs. HFNC on postoperative outcomes in infants undergoing non-cardiac surgery. We hypothesize that prophylactic use of HFNC after non-cardiac surgery in infants would reduce the incidence of post-anesthesia hypoxemia and could also be adapted as first-line oxygen therapy after non-cardiac surgery.<h4>Methods</h4>This is a superior, single-blind, randomized controlled study. A total of 394 infants undergoing general anesthesia will be randomly assigned to accept COT or HFNC in a 1:1 ratio. The primary outcome is the rate of desaturation post-extubation. Secondary outcomes include the rate of mild upper airway obstruction, the rate of severe respiratory depression, the rate of transfer to PICU, duration of oxygen therapy, length of PACU stay, the time to reach full enteral feeding, and postoperative adverse events, including nasal injury, agitation, vomiting, and unplanned secondary surgery related to the initial surgery.<h4>Discussion</h4>This is the first randomized controlled trial to explore the advantages of HFNC in infants to ensure oxygen supply after non-cardiac surgery. If favorable evidence is obtained, HFNC could be adopted as first-line oxygen therapy for infants following non-cardiac surgery.<h4>Trial registration</h4>The trial was registered at https://www.chictr.org.cn (Registration number: ChiCTR2400081600, Date: March 6, 2024).
format Article
id doaj-art-3a6209cf80b64879a79165b30c9729d7
institution Kabale University
issn 1932-6203
language English
publishDate 2025-01-01
publisher Public Library of Science (PLoS)
record_format Article
series PLoS ONE
spelling doaj-art-3a6209cf80b64879a79165b30c9729d72025-01-29T05:30:45ZengPublic Library of Science (PLoS)PLoS ONE1932-62032025-01-01201e031478210.1371/journal.pone.0314782Comparative evaluation of high-flow nasal cannula (HFNC) and conventional oxygen therapy (COT) in infants after non-cardiac surgery: Study protocol of a randomized controlled trial.Diwei ZhangTianqing GongQinghua HuangQianqian ZhangKai LiuJia LiHai YuYu Cui<h4>Background</h4>Literature regarding the advantages of HFNC in infants for ensuring oxygen supply after non-cardiac surgery is insufficient. The purpose of our study is to compare COT vs. HFNC on postoperative outcomes in infants undergoing non-cardiac surgery. We hypothesize that prophylactic use of HFNC after non-cardiac surgery in infants would reduce the incidence of post-anesthesia hypoxemia and could also be adapted as first-line oxygen therapy after non-cardiac surgery.<h4>Methods</h4>This is a superior, single-blind, randomized controlled study. A total of 394 infants undergoing general anesthesia will be randomly assigned to accept COT or HFNC in a 1:1 ratio. The primary outcome is the rate of desaturation post-extubation. Secondary outcomes include the rate of mild upper airway obstruction, the rate of severe respiratory depression, the rate of transfer to PICU, duration of oxygen therapy, length of PACU stay, the time to reach full enteral feeding, and postoperative adverse events, including nasal injury, agitation, vomiting, and unplanned secondary surgery related to the initial surgery.<h4>Discussion</h4>This is the first randomized controlled trial to explore the advantages of HFNC in infants to ensure oxygen supply after non-cardiac surgery. If favorable evidence is obtained, HFNC could be adopted as first-line oxygen therapy for infants following non-cardiac surgery.<h4>Trial registration</h4>The trial was registered at https://www.chictr.org.cn (Registration number: ChiCTR2400081600, Date: March 6, 2024).https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0314782
spellingShingle Diwei Zhang
Tianqing Gong
Qinghua Huang
Qianqian Zhang
Kai Liu
Jia Li
Hai Yu
Yu Cui
Comparative evaluation of high-flow nasal cannula (HFNC) and conventional oxygen therapy (COT) in infants after non-cardiac surgery: Study protocol of a randomized controlled trial.
PLoS ONE
title Comparative evaluation of high-flow nasal cannula (HFNC) and conventional oxygen therapy (COT) in infants after non-cardiac surgery: Study protocol of a randomized controlled trial.
title_full Comparative evaluation of high-flow nasal cannula (HFNC) and conventional oxygen therapy (COT) in infants after non-cardiac surgery: Study protocol of a randomized controlled trial.
title_fullStr Comparative evaluation of high-flow nasal cannula (HFNC) and conventional oxygen therapy (COT) in infants after non-cardiac surgery: Study protocol of a randomized controlled trial.
title_full_unstemmed Comparative evaluation of high-flow nasal cannula (HFNC) and conventional oxygen therapy (COT) in infants after non-cardiac surgery: Study protocol of a randomized controlled trial.
title_short Comparative evaluation of high-flow nasal cannula (HFNC) and conventional oxygen therapy (COT) in infants after non-cardiac surgery: Study protocol of a randomized controlled trial.
title_sort comparative evaluation of high flow nasal cannula hfnc and conventional oxygen therapy cot in infants after non cardiac surgery study protocol of a randomized controlled trial
url https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0314782
work_keys_str_mv AT diweizhang comparativeevaluationofhighflownasalcannulahfncandconventionaloxygentherapycotininfantsafternoncardiacsurgerystudyprotocolofarandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT tianqinggong comparativeevaluationofhighflownasalcannulahfncandconventionaloxygentherapycotininfantsafternoncardiacsurgerystudyprotocolofarandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT qinghuahuang comparativeevaluationofhighflownasalcannulahfncandconventionaloxygentherapycotininfantsafternoncardiacsurgerystudyprotocolofarandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT qianqianzhang comparativeevaluationofhighflownasalcannulahfncandconventionaloxygentherapycotininfantsafternoncardiacsurgerystudyprotocolofarandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT kailiu comparativeevaluationofhighflownasalcannulahfncandconventionaloxygentherapycotininfantsafternoncardiacsurgerystudyprotocolofarandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT jiali comparativeevaluationofhighflownasalcannulahfncandconventionaloxygentherapycotininfantsafternoncardiacsurgerystudyprotocolofarandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT haiyu comparativeevaluationofhighflownasalcannulahfncandconventionaloxygentherapycotininfantsafternoncardiacsurgerystudyprotocolofarandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT yucui comparativeevaluationofhighflownasalcannulahfncandconventionaloxygentherapycotininfantsafternoncardiacsurgerystudyprotocolofarandomizedcontrolledtrial