Dedifferentiated Leiomyosarcoma of the Uterus with Heterologous Elements: A Potential Diagnostic Pitfall

Dedifferentiation is a phenomenon that is well characterized in a variety of tumors and is defined by the occurrence of a high-grade or undifferentiated tumor, typically unrecognizable regarding its line of differentiation, from a low-grade/borderline neoplasm. This phenomenon has previously been de...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Kojo R. Rawish, Oluwole Fadare
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Wiley 2012-01-01
Series:Case Reports in Obstetrics and Gynecology
Online Access:http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2012/534634
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
_version_ 1832563628789727232
author Kojo R. Rawish
Oluwole Fadare
author_facet Kojo R. Rawish
Oluwole Fadare
author_sort Kojo R. Rawish
collection DOAJ
description Dedifferentiation is a phenomenon that is well characterized in a variety of tumors and is defined by the occurrence of a high-grade or undifferentiated tumor, typically unrecognizable regarding its line of differentiation, from a low-grade/borderline neoplasm. This phenomenon has previously been described in 2 uterine leiomyosarcomas, but both were devoid of heterologous elements. The authors describe herein a case of a dedifferentiated leiomyosarcoma of the uterus with osteoid heterologous elements, believed to be the first such reported case. The original tumor was a high-grade leiomyosarcoma with large low-grade and leiomyoma-like areas and whose constituent cells displayed intense nuclear immunoreactivity for both estrogen receptor (ER) and progesterone receptor (PR) in approximately 30% of cells. The tumor recurred six months after its resection as an undifferentiated sarcoma that was negative for smooth muscle markers, but which remained positive for ER and PR. Osteoid production was only identified in the recurrent tumor and was significant in extent therein. This case highlights the immunophenotypic changes that may occur in dedifferentiated leiomyosarcomas, and this possibility should be a consideration when an apparently undifferentiated sarcoma is identified in a patient with a history of uterine leiomyosarcoma. In our case, the expression of ER and PR provided significant supportive evidence of the uterine origin of the recurrent tumor.
format Article
id doaj-art-3a382957a4fa488a889a5bd9114b8119
institution Kabale University
issn 2090-6684
2090-6692
language English
publishDate 2012-01-01
publisher Wiley
record_format Article
series Case Reports in Obstetrics and Gynecology
spelling doaj-art-3a382957a4fa488a889a5bd9114b81192025-02-03T01:12:58ZengWileyCase Reports in Obstetrics and Gynecology2090-66842090-66922012-01-01201210.1155/2012/534634534634Dedifferentiated Leiomyosarcoma of the Uterus with Heterologous Elements: A Potential Diagnostic PitfallKojo R. Rawish0Oluwole Fadare1Department of Pathology, Microbiology and Immunology, Vanderbilt University School of Medicine, Nashville, TN 37232, USADepartment of Pathology, Microbiology and Immunology, Vanderbilt University School of Medicine, Nashville, TN 37232, USADedifferentiation is a phenomenon that is well characterized in a variety of tumors and is defined by the occurrence of a high-grade or undifferentiated tumor, typically unrecognizable regarding its line of differentiation, from a low-grade/borderline neoplasm. This phenomenon has previously been described in 2 uterine leiomyosarcomas, but both were devoid of heterologous elements. The authors describe herein a case of a dedifferentiated leiomyosarcoma of the uterus with osteoid heterologous elements, believed to be the first such reported case. The original tumor was a high-grade leiomyosarcoma with large low-grade and leiomyoma-like areas and whose constituent cells displayed intense nuclear immunoreactivity for both estrogen receptor (ER) and progesterone receptor (PR) in approximately 30% of cells. The tumor recurred six months after its resection as an undifferentiated sarcoma that was negative for smooth muscle markers, but which remained positive for ER and PR. Osteoid production was only identified in the recurrent tumor and was significant in extent therein. This case highlights the immunophenotypic changes that may occur in dedifferentiated leiomyosarcomas, and this possibility should be a consideration when an apparently undifferentiated sarcoma is identified in a patient with a history of uterine leiomyosarcoma. In our case, the expression of ER and PR provided significant supportive evidence of the uterine origin of the recurrent tumor.http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2012/534634
spellingShingle Kojo R. Rawish
Oluwole Fadare
Dedifferentiated Leiomyosarcoma of the Uterus with Heterologous Elements: A Potential Diagnostic Pitfall
Case Reports in Obstetrics and Gynecology
title Dedifferentiated Leiomyosarcoma of the Uterus with Heterologous Elements: A Potential Diagnostic Pitfall
title_full Dedifferentiated Leiomyosarcoma of the Uterus with Heterologous Elements: A Potential Diagnostic Pitfall
title_fullStr Dedifferentiated Leiomyosarcoma of the Uterus with Heterologous Elements: A Potential Diagnostic Pitfall
title_full_unstemmed Dedifferentiated Leiomyosarcoma of the Uterus with Heterologous Elements: A Potential Diagnostic Pitfall
title_short Dedifferentiated Leiomyosarcoma of the Uterus with Heterologous Elements: A Potential Diagnostic Pitfall
title_sort dedifferentiated leiomyosarcoma of the uterus with heterologous elements a potential diagnostic pitfall
url http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2012/534634
work_keys_str_mv AT kojorrawish dedifferentiatedleiomyosarcomaoftheuteruswithheterologouselementsapotentialdiagnosticpitfall
AT oluwolefadare dedifferentiatedleiomyosarcomaoftheuteruswithheterologouselementsapotentialdiagnosticpitfall