Questioning the Moratorium on Synthetic Phenomenology

In a paper published in 2021, Thomas Metzinger proposed a global moratorium on development of synthetic phenomenology, with this beginning in 2021 and lasting until 2050, arguing that the development of conscious artifacts would bring about an explosion of human-like suffering on a global scale. The...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Krzanowski Roman
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Sciendo 2024-12-01
Series:Studies in Logic, Grammar and Rhetoric
Subjects:
Online Access:https://doi.org/10.2478/slgr-2024-0023
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
_version_ 1832593605643993088
author Krzanowski Roman
author_facet Krzanowski Roman
author_sort Krzanowski Roman
collection DOAJ
description In a paper published in 2021, Thomas Metzinger proposed a global moratorium on development of synthetic phenomenology, with this beginning in 2021 and lasting until 2050, arguing that the development of conscious artifacts would bring about an explosion of human-like suffering on a global scale. The paper argues that Thomas Metzinger’s call for a global moratorium is unsound as it is currently formulated. Metzinger’s argument is based on a category error, a common mistake in AI discussions. For the sake of clarity in AI discourse, and for reasons explained in the paper, such an error should be at least pointed out, if not corrected. This is the primary purpose of the paper. However, Metzinger’s proposal, can be taken as a generic warning against uncontrolled development of AI – the position we fully agree with.
format Article
id doaj-art-392015f980fe4a55803cefbf761645bc
institution Kabale University
issn 2199-6059
language English
publishDate 2024-12-01
publisher Sciendo
record_format Article
series Studies in Logic, Grammar and Rhetoric
spelling doaj-art-392015f980fe4a55803cefbf761645bc2025-01-20T11:10:12ZengSciendoStudies in Logic, Grammar and Rhetoric2199-60592024-12-0169133535210.2478/slgr-2024-0023Questioning the Moratorium on Synthetic PhenomenologyKrzanowski Roman0Uniwersytet Papieski Jana Pawla II w Krakowie, Krakow, PolandIn a paper published in 2021, Thomas Metzinger proposed a global moratorium on development of synthetic phenomenology, with this beginning in 2021 and lasting until 2050, arguing that the development of conscious artifacts would bring about an explosion of human-like suffering on a global scale. The paper argues that Thomas Metzinger’s call for a global moratorium is unsound as it is currently formulated. Metzinger’s argument is based on a category error, a common mistake in AI discussions. For the sake of clarity in AI discourse, and for reasons explained in the paper, such an error should be at least pointed out, if not corrected. This is the primary purpose of the paper. However, Metzinger’s proposal, can be taken as a generic warning against uncontrolled development of AI – the position we fully agree with.https://doi.org/10.2478/slgr-2024-0023synthetic consciousnessmoratorium on synthetic phenomenologysynthetic sufferingcategory mistakecognitive equivalencethomas metzinger
spellingShingle Krzanowski Roman
Questioning the Moratorium on Synthetic Phenomenology
Studies in Logic, Grammar and Rhetoric
synthetic consciousness
moratorium on synthetic phenomenology
synthetic suffering
category mistake
cognitive equivalence
thomas metzinger
title Questioning the Moratorium on Synthetic Phenomenology
title_full Questioning the Moratorium on Synthetic Phenomenology
title_fullStr Questioning the Moratorium on Synthetic Phenomenology
title_full_unstemmed Questioning the Moratorium on Synthetic Phenomenology
title_short Questioning the Moratorium on Synthetic Phenomenology
title_sort questioning the moratorium on synthetic phenomenology
topic synthetic consciousness
moratorium on synthetic phenomenology
synthetic suffering
category mistake
cognitive equivalence
thomas metzinger
url https://doi.org/10.2478/slgr-2024-0023
work_keys_str_mv AT krzanowskiroman questioningthemoratoriumonsyntheticphenomenology