Effects of Mechanical Stretch on Cell Proliferation and Matrix Formation of Mesenchymal Stem Cell and Anterior Cruciate Ligament Fibroblast

Mesenchymal stem cells (MSCs) and fibroblasts are two major seed cells for ligament tissue engineering. To understand the effects of mechanical stimulation on these cells and to develop effective approaches for cell therapy, it is necessary to investigate the biological effects of various mechanical...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Liguo Sun, Ling Qu, Rui Zhu, Hongguo Li, Yingsen Xue, Xincheng Liu, Jiabing Fan, Hongbin Fan
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Wiley 2016-01-01
Series:Stem Cells International
Online Access:http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2016/9842075
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
_version_ 1832553181526097920
author Liguo Sun
Ling Qu
Rui Zhu
Hongguo Li
Yingsen Xue
Xincheng Liu
Jiabing Fan
Hongbin Fan
author_facet Liguo Sun
Ling Qu
Rui Zhu
Hongguo Li
Yingsen Xue
Xincheng Liu
Jiabing Fan
Hongbin Fan
author_sort Liguo Sun
collection DOAJ
description Mesenchymal stem cells (MSCs) and fibroblasts are two major seed cells for ligament tissue engineering. To understand the effects of mechanical stimulation on these cells and to develop effective approaches for cell therapy, it is necessary to investigate the biological effects of various mechanical loading conditions on cells. In this study, fibroblasts and MSCs were tested and compared under a novel Uniflex/Bioflex culture system that might mimic mechanical strain in ligament tissue. The cells were uniaxially or radially stretched with different strains (5%, 10%, and 15%) at 0.1, 0.5, and 1.0 Hz. The cell proliferation and collagen production were compared to find the optimal parameters. The results indicated that uniaxial stretch (15% at 0.5 Hz; 10% at 1.0 Hz) showed positive effects on fibroblast. The uniaxial strains (5%, 10%, and 15%) at 0.5 Hz and 10% strain at 1.0 Hz were favorable for MSCs. Radial strain did not have significant effect on fibroblast. On the contrary, the radial strains (5%, 10%, and 15%) at 0.1 Hz had positive effects on MSCs. This study suggested that fibroblasts and MSCs had their own appropriate mechanical stimulatory parameters. These specific parameters potentially provide fundamental knowledge for future cell-based ligament regeneration.
format Article
id doaj-art-3877c6d9de264729b1dec83f642dbbc0
institution Kabale University
issn 1687-9678
language English
publishDate 2016-01-01
publisher Wiley
record_format Article
series Stem Cells International
spelling doaj-art-3877c6d9de264729b1dec83f642dbbc02025-02-03T05:54:43ZengWileyStem Cells International1687-96782016-01-01201610.1155/2016/98420759842075Effects of Mechanical Stretch on Cell Proliferation and Matrix Formation of Mesenchymal Stem Cell and Anterior Cruciate Ligament FibroblastLiguo Sun0Ling Qu1Rui Zhu2Hongguo Li3Yingsen Xue4Xincheng Liu5Jiabing Fan6Hongbin Fan7Department of Orthopedic SurgeryDepartment of Clinical LaboratoryCollege of ScienceDepartment of Orthopedic SurgeryDepartment of Orthopedic SurgeryDepartment of Orthopedic SurgeryDivision of Advanced ProsthodonticsDepartment of Orthopedic SurgeryMesenchymal stem cells (MSCs) and fibroblasts are two major seed cells for ligament tissue engineering. To understand the effects of mechanical stimulation on these cells and to develop effective approaches for cell therapy, it is necessary to investigate the biological effects of various mechanical loading conditions on cells. In this study, fibroblasts and MSCs were tested and compared under a novel Uniflex/Bioflex culture system that might mimic mechanical strain in ligament tissue. The cells were uniaxially or radially stretched with different strains (5%, 10%, and 15%) at 0.1, 0.5, and 1.0 Hz. The cell proliferation and collagen production were compared to find the optimal parameters. The results indicated that uniaxial stretch (15% at 0.5 Hz; 10% at 1.0 Hz) showed positive effects on fibroblast. The uniaxial strains (5%, 10%, and 15%) at 0.5 Hz and 10% strain at 1.0 Hz were favorable for MSCs. Radial strain did not have significant effect on fibroblast. On the contrary, the radial strains (5%, 10%, and 15%) at 0.1 Hz had positive effects on MSCs. This study suggested that fibroblasts and MSCs had their own appropriate mechanical stimulatory parameters. These specific parameters potentially provide fundamental knowledge for future cell-based ligament regeneration.http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2016/9842075
spellingShingle Liguo Sun
Ling Qu
Rui Zhu
Hongguo Li
Yingsen Xue
Xincheng Liu
Jiabing Fan
Hongbin Fan
Effects of Mechanical Stretch on Cell Proliferation and Matrix Formation of Mesenchymal Stem Cell and Anterior Cruciate Ligament Fibroblast
Stem Cells International
title Effects of Mechanical Stretch on Cell Proliferation and Matrix Formation of Mesenchymal Stem Cell and Anterior Cruciate Ligament Fibroblast
title_full Effects of Mechanical Stretch on Cell Proliferation and Matrix Formation of Mesenchymal Stem Cell and Anterior Cruciate Ligament Fibroblast
title_fullStr Effects of Mechanical Stretch on Cell Proliferation and Matrix Formation of Mesenchymal Stem Cell and Anterior Cruciate Ligament Fibroblast
title_full_unstemmed Effects of Mechanical Stretch on Cell Proliferation and Matrix Formation of Mesenchymal Stem Cell and Anterior Cruciate Ligament Fibroblast
title_short Effects of Mechanical Stretch on Cell Proliferation and Matrix Formation of Mesenchymal Stem Cell and Anterior Cruciate Ligament Fibroblast
title_sort effects of mechanical stretch on cell proliferation and matrix formation of mesenchymal stem cell and anterior cruciate ligament fibroblast
url http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2016/9842075
work_keys_str_mv AT liguosun effectsofmechanicalstretchoncellproliferationandmatrixformationofmesenchymalstemcellandanteriorcruciateligamentfibroblast
AT lingqu effectsofmechanicalstretchoncellproliferationandmatrixformationofmesenchymalstemcellandanteriorcruciateligamentfibroblast
AT ruizhu effectsofmechanicalstretchoncellproliferationandmatrixformationofmesenchymalstemcellandanteriorcruciateligamentfibroblast
AT hongguoli effectsofmechanicalstretchoncellproliferationandmatrixformationofmesenchymalstemcellandanteriorcruciateligamentfibroblast
AT yingsenxue effectsofmechanicalstretchoncellproliferationandmatrixformationofmesenchymalstemcellandanteriorcruciateligamentfibroblast
AT xinchengliu effectsofmechanicalstretchoncellproliferationandmatrixformationofmesenchymalstemcellandanteriorcruciateligamentfibroblast
AT jiabingfan effectsofmechanicalstretchoncellproliferationandmatrixformationofmesenchymalstemcellandanteriorcruciateligamentfibroblast
AT hongbinfan effectsofmechanicalstretchoncellproliferationandmatrixformationofmesenchymalstemcellandanteriorcruciateligamentfibroblast