A Comparison of Clinical Outcomes of Dislocated Intraocular Lens Fixation between In Situ Refixation and Conventional Exchange Technique Combined with Vitrectomy

Purpose. To evaluate surgical efficacy of in situ refixation technique for dislocated posterior chamber intraocular lens (PCIOL). Methods. This was a single-center retrospective case series. 34 patients (34 eyes) who underwent sclera fixation for dislocated IOLs combined with vitrectomy were studied...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Sun Jung Eum, Myung Jun Kim, Hong Kyun Kim
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Wiley 2016-01-01
Series:Journal of Ophthalmology
Online Access:http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2016/5942687
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
_version_ 1832549779680264192
author Sun Jung Eum
Myung Jun Kim
Hong Kyun Kim
author_facet Sun Jung Eum
Myung Jun Kim
Hong Kyun Kim
author_sort Sun Jung Eum
collection DOAJ
description Purpose. To evaluate surgical efficacy of in situ refixation technique for dislocated posterior chamber intraocular lens (PCIOL). Methods. This was a single-center retrospective case series. 34 patients (34 eyes) who underwent sclera fixation for dislocated IOLs combined with vitrectomy were studied. Of 34 eyes, 17 eyes underwent IOL exchange and the other 17 eyes underwent in situ refixation. Results. Mean follow-up period was 6 months. Mean logMAR best corrected visual acuity (BCVA) was not significantly different between the groups 6 months after surgery (0.10±0.03 in the IOL exchange group and 0.10±0.05 in the refixation group; p=0.065). Surgically induced astigmatism (SIA) was significantly lower in the refixation group (0.79±0.41) than in the IOL exchange group (1.29±0.46) (p=0.004) at 3 months, which persisted to 6 months (1.13±0.18 in the IOL exchange group and 0.74±0.11 in the refixation group; p=0.006). Postoperative complications occurred in 3 eyes in the IOL exchange group (17.6%) and 2 eyes in the refixation group (11.8%). However, all of the patients were well managed without additional surgery. Conclusion. The in situ refixation technique should be preferentially considered if surgery is indicated since it seemed to produce a sustained less SIA compared to IOL exchange.
format Article
id doaj-art-38692a8f10f2455bb33daefe03d5f54b
institution Kabale University
issn 2090-004X
2090-0058
language English
publishDate 2016-01-01
publisher Wiley
record_format Article
series Journal of Ophthalmology
spelling doaj-art-38692a8f10f2455bb33daefe03d5f54b2025-02-03T06:08:29ZengWileyJournal of Ophthalmology2090-004X2090-00582016-01-01201610.1155/2016/59426875942687A Comparison of Clinical Outcomes of Dislocated Intraocular Lens Fixation between In Situ Refixation and Conventional Exchange Technique Combined with VitrectomySun Jung Eum0Myung Jun Kim1Hong Kyun Kim2Department of Ophthalmology, Kyungpook National University School of Medicine, 50 Samduk-2-ga, Jung-gu, Daegu 700-721, Republic of KoreaDepartment of Ophthalmology, Kyungpook National University School of Medicine, 50 Samduk-2-ga, Jung-gu, Daegu 700-721, Republic of KoreaDepartment of Ophthalmology, Kyungpook National University School of Medicine, 50 Samduk-2-ga, Jung-gu, Daegu 700-721, Republic of KoreaPurpose. To evaluate surgical efficacy of in situ refixation technique for dislocated posterior chamber intraocular lens (PCIOL). Methods. This was a single-center retrospective case series. 34 patients (34 eyes) who underwent sclera fixation for dislocated IOLs combined with vitrectomy were studied. Of 34 eyes, 17 eyes underwent IOL exchange and the other 17 eyes underwent in situ refixation. Results. Mean follow-up period was 6 months. Mean logMAR best corrected visual acuity (BCVA) was not significantly different between the groups 6 months after surgery (0.10±0.03 in the IOL exchange group and 0.10±0.05 in the refixation group; p=0.065). Surgically induced astigmatism (SIA) was significantly lower in the refixation group (0.79±0.41) than in the IOL exchange group (1.29±0.46) (p=0.004) at 3 months, which persisted to 6 months (1.13±0.18 in the IOL exchange group and 0.74±0.11 in the refixation group; p=0.006). Postoperative complications occurred in 3 eyes in the IOL exchange group (17.6%) and 2 eyes in the refixation group (11.8%). However, all of the patients were well managed without additional surgery. Conclusion. The in situ refixation technique should be preferentially considered if surgery is indicated since it seemed to produce a sustained less SIA compared to IOL exchange.http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2016/5942687
spellingShingle Sun Jung Eum
Myung Jun Kim
Hong Kyun Kim
A Comparison of Clinical Outcomes of Dislocated Intraocular Lens Fixation between In Situ Refixation and Conventional Exchange Technique Combined with Vitrectomy
Journal of Ophthalmology
title A Comparison of Clinical Outcomes of Dislocated Intraocular Lens Fixation between In Situ Refixation and Conventional Exchange Technique Combined with Vitrectomy
title_full A Comparison of Clinical Outcomes of Dislocated Intraocular Lens Fixation between In Situ Refixation and Conventional Exchange Technique Combined with Vitrectomy
title_fullStr A Comparison of Clinical Outcomes of Dislocated Intraocular Lens Fixation between In Situ Refixation and Conventional Exchange Technique Combined with Vitrectomy
title_full_unstemmed A Comparison of Clinical Outcomes of Dislocated Intraocular Lens Fixation between In Situ Refixation and Conventional Exchange Technique Combined with Vitrectomy
title_short A Comparison of Clinical Outcomes of Dislocated Intraocular Lens Fixation between In Situ Refixation and Conventional Exchange Technique Combined with Vitrectomy
title_sort comparison of clinical outcomes of dislocated intraocular lens fixation between in situ refixation and conventional exchange technique combined with vitrectomy
url http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2016/5942687
work_keys_str_mv AT sunjungeum acomparisonofclinicaloutcomesofdislocatedintraocularlensfixationbetweeninsiturefixationandconventionalexchangetechniquecombinedwithvitrectomy
AT myungjunkim acomparisonofclinicaloutcomesofdislocatedintraocularlensfixationbetweeninsiturefixationandconventionalexchangetechniquecombinedwithvitrectomy
AT hongkyunkim acomparisonofclinicaloutcomesofdislocatedintraocularlensfixationbetweeninsiturefixationandconventionalexchangetechniquecombinedwithvitrectomy
AT sunjungeum comparisonofclinicaloutcomesofdislocatedintraocularlensfixationbetweeninsiturefixationandconventionalexchangetechniquecombinedwithvitrectomy
AT myungjunkim comparisonofclinicaloutcomesofdislocatedintraocularlensfixationbetweeninsiturefixationandconventionalexchangetechniquecombinedwithvitrectomy
AT hongkyunkim comparisonofclinicaloutcomesofdislocatedintraocularlensfixationbetweeninsiturefixationandconventionalexchangetechniquecombinedwithvitrectomy