The Post-Pandemic Inflation Debate: A Critical Review

This article offers a critical review of the post-pandemic inflation debate. The first section organizes the debate by categorizing the arguments into two broad perspectives: the neoclassical view and the critical political economy view, along with several subcategories. This classification is guid...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Diogo Martins
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Associazione Economia civile 2025-01-01
Series:PSL Quarterly Review
Subjects:
Online Access:https://rosa.uniroma1.it/rosa04/psl_quarterly_review/article/view/18549
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
_version_ 1832572060572844032
author Diogo Martins
author_facet Diogo Martins
author_sort Diogo Martins
collection DOAJ
description This article offers a critical review of the post-pandemic inflation debate. The first section organizes the debate by categorizing the arguments into two broad perspectives: the neoclassical view and the critical political economy view, along with several subcategories. This classification is guided by the positions that participants in the debate took regarding the origins and propagation mechanisms of inflation, as well as the economic policy solutions proposed to address the current inflationary period. The second section highlights that the dominance of contractionary monetary policy as the primary response to contemporary inflation rests on weak foundations, with its theoretical and empirical justifications having been consistently and convincingly challenged by critical political economy circles over the past decades.
format Article
id doaj-art-3844e898b4cc49c8b62023394e668fe8
institution Kabale University
issn 2037-3635
2037-3643
language English
publishDate 2025-01-01
publisher Associazione Economia civile
record_format Article
series PSL Quarterly Review
spelling doaj-art-3844e898b4cc49c8b62023394e668fe82025-02-02T12:06:56ZengAssociazione Economia civilePSL Quarterly Review2037-36352037-36432025-01-017731110.13133/2037-3643/18549The Post-Pandemic Inflation Debate: A Critical ReviewDiogo Martins0University of Massachusetts Amherst This article offers a critical review of the post-pandemic inflation debate. The first section organizes the debate by categorizing the arguments into two broad perspectives: the neoclassical view and the critical political economy view, along with several subcategories. This classification is guided by the positions that participants in the debate took regarding the origins and propagation mechanisms of inflation, as well as the economic policy solutions proposed to address the current inflationary period. The second section highlights that the dominance of contractionary monetary policy as the primary response to contemporary inflation rests on weak foundations, with its theoretical and empirical justifications having been consistently and convincingly challenged by critical political economy circles over the past decades. https://rosa.uniroma1.it/rosa04/psl_quarterly_review/article/view/18549inflationpandemiccritical political economyNeoclassical economicscentral banksmonetary policy
spellingShingle Diogo Martins
The Post-Pandemic Inflation Debate: A Critical Review
PSL Quarterly Review
inflation
pandemic
critical political economy
Neoclassical economics
central banks
monetary policy
title The Post-Pandemic Inflation Debate: A Critical Review
title_full The Post-Pandemic Inflation Debate: A Critical Review
title_fullStr The Post-Pandemic Inflation Debate: A Critical Review
title_full_unstemmed The Post-Pandemic Inflation Debate: A Critical Review
title_short The Post-Pandemic Inflation Debate: A Critical Review
title_sort post pandemic inflation debate a critical review
topic inflation
pandemic
critical political economy
Neoclassical economics
central banks
monetary policy
url https://rosa.uniroma1.it/rosa04/psl_quarterly_review/article/view/18549
work_keys_str_mv AT diogomartins thepostpandemicinflationdebateacriticalreview
AT diogomartins postpandemicinflationdebateacriticalreview