Vocational and psychosocial predictors of medical negligence claims among Australian doctors: a prospective cohort analysis of the MABEL survey

Objective To understand the association between medical negligence claims and doctors’ sex, age, specialty, working hours, work location, personality, social supports, family circumstances, self-rated health, self-rated life satisfaction and presence of recent injury or illness.Design and setting Pr...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Anthony Scott, Marie Bismark, Owen M Bradfield, Matthew Spittal
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: BMJ Publishing Group 2022-06-01
Series:BMJ Open
Online Access:https://bmjopen.bmj.com/content/12/6/e055432.full
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
_version_ 1832583708669902848
author Anthony Scott
Marie Bismark
Owen M Bradfield
Matthew Spittal
author_facet Anthony Scott
Marie Bismark
Owen M Bradfield
Matthew Spittal
author_sort Anthony Scott
collection DOAJ
description Objective To understand the association between medical negligence claims and doctors’ sex, age, specialty, working hours, work location, personality, social supports, family circumstances, self-rated health, self-rated life satisfaction and presence of recent injury or illness.Design and setting Prospective cohort study of Australian doctors.Participants 12 134 doctors who completed the Medicine in Australia: Balancing Employment and Life survey between 2013 and 2019.Primary outcome measure Doctors named as a defendant in a medical negligence claim in the preceding 12 months.Results 649 (5.35%) doctors reported being named in a medical negligence claim during the study period. In addition to previously identified demographic factors (sex, age and specialty), we identified the following vocational and psychosocial risk factors for claims: working full time (OR=1.48, 95% CI 1.13 to 1.94) or overtime hours (OR 1.70, 95% CI 1.29 to 2.23), working in a regional centre (OR 1.69, 95% CI 1.37 to 2.08), increasing job demands (OR 1.16, 95% CI 1.04 to 1.30), low self-rated life satisfaction (OR 1.43, 95% CI 1.08 to 1.91) and recent serious personal injury or illness (OR 1.40, 95% CI 1.13 to 1.72). Having an agreeable personality was mildly protective (OR 0.91, 95% CI 0.83 to 1.00). When stratified according to sex, we found that working in a regional area, low self-rated life satisfaction and not achieving work–life balance predicted medical negligence claims in male, but not female, doctors. However, working more than part-time hours and having a recent personal injury or illness predicted medical negligence claims in female, but not male, doctors. Increasing age predicted claims more strongly in male doctors. Personality type predicted claims in both male and female doctors.Conclusions Modifiable risk factors contribute to an increased risk of medical negligence claims among doctors in Australia. Creating more supportive work environments and targeting interventions that improve doctors’ health and well-being could reduce the risk of medical negligence claims and contribute to improved patient safety.
format Article
id doaj-art-37dede6de85c4a92b60b653bbad34a12
institution Kabale University
issn 2044-6055
language English
publishDate 2022-06-01
publisher BMJ Publishing Group
record_format Article
series BMJ Open
spelling doaj-art-37dede6de85c4a92b60b653bbad34a122025-01-28T07:25:12ZengBMJ Publishing GroupBMJ Open2044-60552022-06-0112610.1136/bmjopen-2021-055432Vocational and psychosocial predictors of medical negligence claims among Australian doctors: a prospective cohort analysis of the MABEL surveyAnthony Scott0Marie Bismark1Owen M Bradfield2Matthew Spittal3Melbourne Institute of Applied Economic and Social Research, University of Melbourne, Carlton, Victoria, AustraliaMelbourne School of Population and Global Health, University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia1 Law and Public Health Unit, Centre for Health Policy, Melbourne School of Population and Global Health, The University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Victoria, AustraliaCentre for Mental Health, Melbourne School of Population and Global Health, The University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Victoria, AustraliaObjective To understand the association between medical negligence claims and doctors’ sex, age, specialty, working hours, work location, personality, social supports, family circumstances, self-rated health, self-rated life satisfaction and presence of recent injury or illness.Design and setting Prospective cohort study of Australian doctors.Participants 12 134 doctors who completed the Medicine in Australia: Balancing Employment and Life survey between 2013 and 2019.Primary outcome measure Doctors named as a defendant in a medical negligence claim in the preceding 12 months.Results 649 (5.35%) doctors reported being named in a medical negligence claim during the study period. In addition to previously identified demographic factors (sex, age and specialty), we identified the following vocational and psychosocial risk factors for claims: working full time (OR=1.48, 95% CI 1.13 to 1.94) or overtime hours (OR 1.70, 95% CI 1.29 to 2.23), working in a regional centre (OR 1.69, 95% CI 1.37 to 2.08), increasing job demands (OR 1.16, 95% CI 1.04 to 1.30), low self-rated life satisfaction (OR 1.43, 95% CI 1.08 to 1.91) and recent serious personal injury or illness (OR 1.40, 95% CI 1.13 to 1.72). Having an agreeable personality was mildly protective (OR 0.91, 95% CI 0.83 to 1.00). When stratified according to sex, we found that working in a regional area, low self-rated life satisfaction and not achieving work–life balance predicted medical negligence claims in male, but not female, doctors. However, working more than part-time hours and having a recent personal injury or illness predicted medical negligence claims in female, but not male, doctors. Increasing age predicted claims more strongly in male doctors. Personality type predicted claims in both male and female doctors.Conclusions Modifiable risk factors contribute to an increased risk of medical negligence claims among doctors in Australia. Creating more supportive work environments and targeting interventions that improve doctors’ health and well-being could reduce the risk of medical negligence claims and contribute to improved patient safety.https://bmjopen.bmj.com/content/12/6/e055432.full
spellingShingle Anthony Scott
Marie Bismark
Owen M Bradfield
Matthew Spittal
Vocational and psychosocial predictors of medical negligence claims among Australian doctors: a prospective cohort analysis of the MABEL survey
BMJ Open
title Vocational and psychosocial predictors of medical negligence claims among Australian doctors: a prospective cohort analysis of the MABEL survey
title_full Vocational and psychosocial predictors of medical negligence claims among Australian doctors: a prospective cohort analysis of the MABEL survey
title_fullStr Vocational and psychosocial predictors of medical negligence claims among Australian doctors: a prospective cohort analysis of the MABEL survey
title_full_unstemmed Vocational and psychosocial predictors of medical negligence claims among Australian doctors: a prospective cohort analysis of the MABEL survey
title_short Vocational and psychosocial predictors of medical negligence claims among Australian doctors: a prospective cohort analysis of the MABEL survey
title_sort vocational and psychosocial predictors of medical negligence claims among australian doctors a prospective cohort analysis of the mabel survey
url https://bmjopen.bmj.com/content/12/6/e055432.full
work_keys_str_mv AT anthonyscott vocationalandpsychosocialpredictorsofmedicalnegligenceclaimsamongaustraliandoctorsaprospectivecohortanalysisofthemabelsurvey
AT mariebismark vocationalandpsychosocialpredictorsofmedicalnegligenceclaimsamongaustraliandoctorsaprospectivecohortanalysisofthemabelsurvey
AT owenmbradfield vocationalandpsychosocialpredictorsofmedicalnegligenceclaimsamongaustraliandoctorsaprospectivecohortanalysisofthemabelsurvey
AT matthewspittal vocationalandpsychosocialpredictorsofmedicalnegligenceclaimsamongaustraliandoctorsaprospectivecohortanalysisofthemabelsurvey