High prevalence of undocumented SARS-CoV-2 infections revealed by analysis of nucleocapsid-specific IgG responses in diagnosed and undiagnosed individuals.
Acute SARS-CoV-2 infections are not always diagnosed; hence an unknown proportion of all infections are not documented. SARS-CoV-2 can induce spike and nucleocapsid protein specific IgG antibodies, which can be detected in seroprevalence studies to identify a previous infection. However, with the in...
Saved in:
| Main Authors: | , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , |
|---|---|
| Format: | Article |
| Language: | English |
| Published: |
Public Library of Science (PLoS)
2025-01-01
|
| Series: | PLOS Global Public Health |
| Online Access: | https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pgph.0003300 |
| Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
| Summary: | Acute SARS-CoV-2 infections are not always diagnosed; hence an unknown proportion of all infections are not documented. SARS-CoV-2 can induce spike and nucleocapsid protein specific IgG antibodies, which can be detected in seroprevalence studies to identify a previous infection. However, with the introduction of vaccines containing the spike protein it is no longer possible to use spike-IgG as a marker of infection. In many countries marketed vaccines do not include the nucleocapsid protein, allowing the use of nucleocapsid-specific IgG (N-IgG) as a specific marker for previous infection. Importantly however, not all SARS-CoV-2-infected individuals develop detectable N-IgG responses and there are reports of waning of N-IgG titers in previously infected individuals, complicating the use of N-IgG in seroprevalence studies. Here, our aim was to investigate N-IgG as a marker for previous infection. To this end we analyzed a well characterized cohort (n = 2,583; sampled in March, 2022), including 612 participants with a previously diagnosed and documented SARS-CoV-2-infection. We show that 75% (460/612) of the confirmed SARS-CoV-2-infected participants were N-IgG positive, and that the frequency of seropositivity was stable for at least 105 weeks after the latest documented SARS-CoV-2-infection. Among participants with no documented SARS-CoV-2-infection, 32.6% (642/1971) were N-IgG-positive, suggesting a previous infection. Assuming similar frequency of N-IgG-seronegative cases in previously diagnosed and undiagnosed individuals we further estimate that 214 of the 1329 undiagnosed and N-IgG-negative cases had been previously infected, indicating a total infection rate of 56.8% (1,468/2,583), clearly higher than the documented 23.7% rate of infection, in this cohort. In conclusion, our results suggest that while N-IgG is a good marker of previous SARS-CoV-2-infection the large proportion of previously infected N-IgG-negative individuals introduces a risk for underestimations of total level of previously infected individuals in a population. Accounting for this dark number of undiagnosable cases can provide better estimates of total level of infected individuals in a population. |
|---|---|
| ISSN: | 2767-3375 |