A novel multimodality anthropomorphic phantom enhances compliance with quality assurance guidelines for magnetic resonance imaging in radiotherapy

Background and purpose: The use of magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) for radiotherapy (RT) simulation has grown, prompting quality assurance (QA) guidelines by the Institute of Physics and Engineering in Medicine (IPEM) and the American Association of Physicists in Medicine (AAPM). This study compare...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Meshal Alzahrani, David A Broadbent, Irvin Teh, Bashar Al-Qaisieh, Emily Johnstone, Richard Speight
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Elsevier 2025-01-01
Series:Physics and Imaging in Radiation Oncology
Subjects:
Online Access:http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2405631625000120
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
_version_ 1832583078085656576
author Meshal Alzahrani
David A Broadbent
Irvin Teh
Bashar Al-Qaisieh
Emily Johnstone
Richard Speight
author_facet Meshal Alzahrani
David A Broadbent
Irvin Teh
Bashar Al-Qaisieh
Emily Johnstone
Richard Speight
author_sort Meshal Alzahrani
collection DOAJ
description Background and purpose: The use of magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) for radiotherapy (RT) simulation has grown, prompting quality assurance (QA) guidelines by the Institute of Physics and Engineering in Medicine (IPEM) and the American Association of Physicists in Medicine (AAPM). This study compares a novel multimodality anthropomorphic phantom to an American College of Radiology (ACR) phantom for a subset of these MRI-specific QA tests in RT. Materials and methods: A novel 3D-printed multimodality head-and-neck anthropomorphic phantom was compared to an ACR large MRI phantom. IPEM and AAPM-recommended QA tests were conducted, including informatics/connectivity/data transfer, MRI-CT registration, end-to-end QA, and signal-to-noise ratio (SNR)/percentage integral uniformity (PIU) assessments using RT accessories. Results: Both phantoms were suitable for informatics/connectivity/data transfer. In MRI-CT registration, no errors were found; the ACR phantom offered more quantitative landmarks, while the anthropomorphic phantom provided limited structures. Both phantoms achieved target registration errors (TREs) below 0.97 mm and dice similarity coefficient (DSC) values above 0.9, meeting guidelines. For end-to-end QA, the anthropomorphic phantom facilitated dose measurements of 1.994 Gy versus a calculated 2.01 Gy (−0.8 %). SNR and PIU assessments showed higher values in radiology setups compared to RT setups for both phantoms. Conclusions: Multimodality anthropomorphic phantoms compatible with dosimetric equipment allow realistic end-to-end QA, unlike the ACR phantom. While the ACR phantom is suitable for informatics and MRI-CT registration, anthropomorphic phantoms better represent clinical scenarios. For comprehensive QA, both ACR and anthropomorphic phantoms are required. Additionally, large field-of-view (FOV) phantoms are crucial for evaluating large FOV MRI distortions.
format Article
id doaj-art-3752bd7cec4d4e5399d06420c601846b
institution Kabale University
issn 2405-6316
language English
publishDate 2025-01-01
publisher Elsevier
record_format Article
series Physics and Imaging in Radiation Oncology
spelling doaj-art-3752bd7cec4d4e5399d06420c601846b2025-01-29T05:01:29ZengElsevierPhysics and Imaging in Radiation Oncology2405-63162025-01-0133100707A novel multimodality anthropomorphic phantom enhances compliance with quality assurance guidelines for magnetic resonance imaging in radiotherapyMeshal Alzahrani0David A Broadbent1Irvin Teh2Bashar Al-Qaisieh3Emily Johnstone4Richard Speight5Department of Radiologic Sciences, Faculty of Applied Medical Sciences, King Abdulaziz University, Jeddah, Saudi Arabia; Department of Medical Physics and Engineering, Leeds Teaching Hospitals NHS Trust, Leeds, UK; Leeds Institute of Cardiovascular and Metabolic Medicine, University of Leeds, Leeds, UK; Corresponding authors at: Department of Medical Physics and Engineering, Leeds Teaching Hospitals NHS Trust, St. James’s University Hospital, Leeds LS9 7TF, UK.Department of Medical Physics and Engineering, Leeds Teaching Hospitals NHS Trust, Leeds, UK; Leeds Institute of Cardiovascular and Metabolic Medicine, University of Leeds, Leeds, UKLeeds Institute of Cardiovascular and Metabolic Medicine, University of Leeds, Leeds, UKDepartment of Medical Physics and Engineering, Leeds Teaching Hospitals NHS Trust, Leeds, UKChristie Medical Physics and Engineering, The Christie NHS Foundation Trust, Manchester, UKDepartment of Medical Physics and Engineering, Leeds Teaching Hospitals NHS Trust, Leeds, UK; Corresponding authors at: Department of Medical Physics and Engineering, Leeds Teaching Hospitals NHS Trust, St. James’s University Hospital, Leeds LS9 7TF, UK.Background and purpose: The use of magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) for radiotherapy (RT) simulation has grown, prompting quality assurance (QA) guidelines by the Institute of Physics and Engineering in Medicine (IPEM) and the American Association of Physicists in Medicine (AAPM). This study compares a novel multimodality anthropomorphic phantom to an American College of Radiology (ACR) phantom for a subset of these MRI-specific QA tests in RT. Materials and methods: A novel 3D-printed multimodality head-and-neck anthropomorphic phantom was compared to an ACR large MRI phantom. IPEM and AAPM-recommended QA tests were conducted, including informatics/connectivity/data transfer, MRI-CT registration, end-to-end QA, and signal-to-noise ratio (SNR)/percentage integral uniformity (PIU) assessments using RT accessories. Results: Both phantoms were suitable for informatics/connectivity/data transfer. In MRI-CT registration, no errors were found; the ACR phantom offered more quantitative landmarks, while the anthropomorphic phantom provided limited structures. Both phantoms achieved target registration errors (TREs) below 0.97 mm and dice similarity coefficient (DSC) values above 0.9, meeting guidelines. For end-to-end QA, the anthropomorphic phantom facilitated dose measurements of 1.994 Gy versus a calculated 2.01 Gy (−0.8 %). SNR and PIU assessments showed higher values in radiology setups compared to RT setups for both phantoms. Conclusions: Multimodality anthropomorphic phantoms compatible with dosimetric equipment allow realistic end-to-end QA, unlike the ACR phantom. While the ACR phantom is suitable for informatics and MRI-CT registration, anthropomorphic phantoms better represent clinical scenarios. For comprehensive QA, both ACR and anthropomorphic phantoms are required. Additionally, large field-of-view (FOV) phantoms are crucial for evaluating large FOV MRI distortions.http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2405631625000120Magnetic resonance imagingRadiotherapyMRI in RTQuality assuranceACR phantomMultimodal anthropomorphic phantom
spellingShingle Meshal Alzahrani
David A Broadbent
Irvin Teh
Bashar Al-Qaisieh
Emily Johnstone
Richard Speight
A novel multimodality anthropomorphic phantom enhances compliance with quality assurance guidelines for magnetic resonance imaging in radiotherapy
Physics and Imaging in Radiation Oncology
Magnetic resonance imaging
Radiotherapy
MRI in RT
Quality assurance
ACR phantom
Multimodal anthropomorphic phantom
title A novel multimodality anthropomorphic phantom enhances compliance with quality assurance guidelines for magnetic resonance imaging in radiotherapy
title_full A novel multimodality anthropomorphic phantom enhances compliance with quality assurance guidelines for magnetic resonance imaging in radiotherapy
title_fullStr A novel multimodality anthropomorphic phantom enhances compliance with quality assurance guidelines for magnetic resonance imaging in radiotherapy
title_full_unstemmed A novel multimodality anthropomorphic phantom enhances compliance with quality assurance guidelines for magnetic resonance imaging in radiotherapy
title_short A novel multimodality anthropomorphic phantom enhances compliance with quality assurance guidelines for magnetic resonance imaging in radiotherapy
title_sort novel multimodality anthropomorphic phantom enhances compliance with quality assurance guidelines for magnetic resonance imaging in radiotherapy
topic Magnetic resonance imaging
Radiotherapy
MRI in RT
Quality assurance
ACR phantom
Multimodal anthropomorphic phantom
url http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2405631625000120
work_keys_str_mv AT meshalalzahrani anovelmultimodalityanthropomorphicphantomenhancescompliancewithqualityassuranceguidelinesformagneticresonanceimaginginradiotherapy
AT davidabroadbent anovelmultimodalityanthropomorphicphantomenhancescompliancewithqualityassuranceguidelinesformagneticresonanceimaginginradiotherapy
AT irvinteh anovelmultimodalityanthropomorphicphantomenhancescompliancewithqualityassuranceguidelinesformagneticresonanceimaginginradiotherapy
AT basharalqaisieh anovelmultimodalityanthropomorphicphantomenhancescompliancewithqualityassuranceguidelinesformagneticresonanceimaginginradiotherapy
AT emilyjohnstone anovelmultimodalityanthropomorphicphantomenhancescompliancewithqualityassuranceguidelinesformagneticresonanceimaginginradiotherapy
AT richardspeight anovelmultimodalityanthropomorphicphantomenhancescompliancewithqualityassuranceguidelinesformagneticresonanceimaginginradiotherapy
AT meshalalzahrani novelmultimodalityanthropomorphicphantomenhancescompliancewithqualityassuranceguidelinesformagneticresonanceimaginginradiotherapy
AT davidabroadbent novelmultimodalityanthropomorphicphantomenhancescompliancewithqualityassuranceguidelinesformagneticresonanceimaginginradiotherapy
AT irvinteh novelmultimodalityanthropomorphicphantomenhancescompliancewithqualityassuranceguidelinesformagneticresonanceimaginginradiotherapy
AT basharalqaisieh novelmultimodalityanthropomorphicphantomenhancescompliancewithqualityassuranceguidelinesformagneticresonanceimaginginradiotherapy
AT emilyjohnstone novelmultimodalityanthropomorphicphantomenhancescompliancewithqualityassuranceguidelinesformagneticresonanceimaginginradiotherapy
AT richardspeight novelmultimodalityanthropomorphicphantomenhancescompliancewithqualityassuranceguidelinesformagneticresonanceimaginginradiotherapy