A systematic review of machine learning applications in predicting opioid associated adverse events

Abstract Machine learning has increasingly been applied to predict opioid-related harms due to its ability to handle complex interactions and generating actionable predictions. This review evaluated the types and quality of ML methods in opioid safety research, identifying 44 studies using supervise...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Carlos R. Ramírez Medina, Jose Benitez-Aurioles, David A. Jenkins, Meghna Jani
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Nature Portfolio 2025-01-01
Series:npj Digital Medicine
Online Access:https://doi.org/10.1038/s41746-024-01312-4
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
_version_ 1832594396401369088
author Carlos R. Ramírez Medina
Jose Benitez-Aurioles
David A. Jenkins
Meghna Jani
author_facet Carlos R. Ramírez Medina
Jose Benitez-Aurioles
David A. Jenkins
Meghna Jani
author_sort Carlos R. Ramírez Medina
collection DOAJ
description Abstract Machine learning has increasingly been applied to predict opioid-related harms due to its ability to handle complex interactions and generating actionable predictions. This review evaluated the types and quality of ML methods in opioid safety research, identifying 44 studies using supervised ML through searches of Ovid MEDLINE, PubMed and SCOPUS databases. Commonly predicted outcomes included postoperative opioid use (n = 15, 34%) opioid overdose (n = 8, 18%), opioid use disorder (n = 8, 18%) and persistent opioid use (n = 5, 11%) with varying definitions. Most studies (96%) originated from North America, with only 7% reporting external validation. Model performance was moderate to strong, but calibration was often missing (41%). Transparent reporting of model development was often incomplete, with key aspects such as calibration, imbalance correction, and handling of missing data absent. Infrequent external validation limited the generalizability of current models. Addressing these aspects is critical for transparency, interpretability, and future implementation of the results.
format Article
id doaj-art-36a8cc58c73d4e95b9687e00ce6d503e
institution Kabale University
issn 2398-6352
language English
publishDate 2025-01-01
publisher Nature Portfolio
record_format Article
series npj Digital Medicine
spelling doaj-art-36a8cc58c73d4e95b9687e00ce6d503e2025-01-19T12:39:52ZengNature Portfolionpj Digital Medicine2398-63522025-01-018111310.1038/s41746-024-01312-4A systematic review of machine learning applications in predicting opioid associated adverse eventsCarlos R. Ramírez Medina0Jose Benitez-Aurioles1David A. Jenkins2Meghna Jani3Centre for Epidemiology Versus Arthritis, Centre for Musculoskeletal Research, Division of Musculoskeletal and Dermatological Sciences, The University of ManchesterDivision of Informatics, Imaging and Data Science, The University of ManchesterDivision of Informatics, Imaging and Data Science, The University of ManchesterCentre for Epidemiology Versus Arthritis, Centre for Musculoskeletal Research, Division of Musculoskeletal and Dermatological Sciences, The University of ManchesterAbstract Machine learning has increasingly been applied to predict opioid-related harms due to its ability to handle complex interactions and generating actionable predictions. This review evaluated the types and quality of ML methods in opioid safety research, identifying 44 studies using supervised ML through searches of Ovid MEDLINE, PubMed and SCOPUS databases. Commonly predicted outcomes included postoperative opioid use (n = 15, 34%) opioid overdose (n = 8, 18%), opioid use disorder (n = 8, 18%) and persistent opioid use (n = 5, 11%) with varying definitions. Most studies (96%) originated from North America, with only 7% reporting external validation. Model performance was moderate to strong, but calibration was often missing (41%). Transparent reporting of model development was often incomplete, with key aspects such as calibration, imbalance correction, and handling of missing data absent. Infrequent external validation limited the generalizability of current models. Addressing these aspects is critical for transparency, interpretability, and future implementation of the results.https://doi.org/10.1038/s41746-024-01312-4
spellingShingle Carlos R. Ramírez Medina
Jose Benitez-Aurioles
David A. Jenkins
Meghna Jani
A systematic review of machine learning applications in predicting opioid associated adverse events
npj Digital Medicine
title A systematic review of machine learning applications in predicting opioid associated adverse events
title_full A systematic review of machine learning applications in predicting opioid associated adverse events
title_fullStr A systematic review of machine learning applications in predicting opioid associated adverse events
title_full_unstemmed A systematic review of machine learning applications in predicting opioid associated adverse events
title_short A systematic review of machine learning applications in predicting opioid associated adverse events
title_sort systematic review of machine learning applications in predicting opioid associated adverse events
url https://doi.org/10.1038/s41746-024-01312-4
work_keys_str_mv AT carlosrramirezmedina asystematicreviewofmachinelearningapplicationsinpredictingopioidassociatedadverseevents
AT josebenitezaurioles asystematicreviewofmachinelearningapplicationsinpredictingopioidassociatedadverseevents
AT davidajenkins asystematicreviewofmachinelearningapplicationsinpredictingopioidassociatedadverseevents
AT meghnajani asystematicreviewofmachinelearningapplicationsinpredictingopioidassociatedadverseevents
AT carlosrramirezmedina systematicreviewofmachinelearningapplicationsinpredictingopioidassociatedadverseevents
AT josebenitezaurioles systematicreviewofmachinelearningapplicationsinpredictingopioidassociatedadverseevents
AT davidajenkins systematicreviewofmachinelearningapplicationsinpredictingopioidassociatedadverseevents
AT meghnajani systematicreviewofmachinelearningapplicationsinpredictingopioidassociatedadverseevents