Efficacy and Safety of Drug-Eluting Bead TACE in the Treatment of Primary or Secondary Liver Cancer

Background. The drug-eluting beads transarterial chemoembolization (DEB-TACE) has already been used in hepatic malignancies. We aim to evaluate the efficacy and safety of DEB-TACE in treating primary or secondary liver cancer. Methods. We retrospectively evaluated 59 patients with hepatic malignanci...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Jiabing Wang, Haoqian Xu, Ying Wang, Long Feng, Fengming Yi
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Wiley 2023-01-01
Series:Canadian Journal of Gastroenterology and Hepatology
Online Access:http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2023/5492931
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
_version_ 1832547976856207360
author Jiabing Wang
Haoqian Xu
Ying Wang
Long Feng
Fengming Yi
author_facet Jiabing Wang
Haoqian Xu
Ying Wang
Long Feng
Fengming Yi
author_sort Jiabing Wang
collection DOAJ
description Background. The drug-eluting beads transarterial chemoembolization (DEB-TACE) has already been used in hepatic malignancies. We aim to evaluate the efficacy and safety of DEB-TACE in treating primary or secondary liver cancer. Methods. We retrospectively evaluated 59 patients with hepatic malignancies, including 41 patients with primary liver cancer and 18 patients with secondary liver cancer, between September 2016 and February 2019. All patients were treated with DEB-TACE. Objective response rate (ORR) and disease control rate (DCR) were evaluated by mRECIST. The pain was assessed using a numerical rating scale (NRS) where 0 represented no pain, and a score of ten was unbearable. Adverse reactions were assessed according to Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events 4.0 (CTCAE4.0). Results. In the subgroup of primary liver cancer, 3 patients (7.32%) got complete response, 13 patients (31.71%) got partial response, 21 patients (51.22%) experienced stable disease, and 4 patients (9.76%) suffered progressive disease; ORR was 39.02% and DCR was 90.24%. In the subgroup of secondary liver cancer, 0 patients (0%) got complete response, 6 patients (33.33%) got partial response, 11 patients (61.11%) experienced stable disease, and 1 patient (5.56%) suffered progressive disease; ORR was 33.33% and DCR was 94.44%. We did not find any difference when comparing the efficacy between primary and secondary liver cancer (P=0.612). The one-year survival rate was 70.73% for primary liver cancer and 61.11% for secondary liver cancer. There was no significant difference between the two groups (P=0.52). For the patients with CR or PR, no factor could predict the efficacy of DEB-TACE. The most common treatment-related adverse reactions were short-term liver function disorders. The symptoms included fever (20.34%), abdomen pain (16.95%), and vomiting (5.08%), all patients with adverse reactions got remission after treatment. Conclusions. DEB-TACE has a promising effect in the treatment of primary or secondary liver cancer. The treatment-related adverse reactions are tolerable.
format Article
id doaj-art-369bd54b7a434a93808fe99a2f6b9d04
institution Kabale University
issn 2291-2797
language English
publishDate 2023-01-01
publisher Wiley
record_format Article
series Canadian Journal of Gastroenterology and Hepatology
spelling doaj-art-369bd54b7a434a93808fe99a2f6b9d042025-02-03T06:42:45ZengWileyCanadian Journal of Gastroenterology and Hepatology2291-27972023-01-01202310.1155/2023/5492931Efficacy and Safety of Drug-Eluting Bead TACE in the Treatment of Primary or Secondary Liver CancerJiabing Wang0Haoqian Xu1Ying Wang2Long Feng3Fengming Yi4Department of OncologyDepartment of OncologyDepartment of OncologyDepartment of OncologyDepartment of OncologyBackground. The drug-eluting beads transarterial chemoembolization (DEB-TACE) has already been used in hepatic malignancies. We aim to evaluate the efficacy and safety of DEB-TACE in treating primary or secondary liver cancer. Methods. We retrospectively evaluated 59 patients with hepatic malignancies, including 41 patients with primary liver cancer and 18 patients with secondary liver cancer, between September 2016 and February 2019. All patients were treated with DEB-TACE. Objective response rate (ORR) and disease control rate (DCR) were evaluated by mRECIST. The pain was assessed using a numerical rating scale (NRS) where 0 represented no pain, and a score of ten was unbearable. Adverse reactions were assessed according to Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events 4.0 (CTCAE4.0). Results. In the subgroup of primary liver cancer, 3 patients (7.32%) got complete response, 13 patients (31.71%) got partial response, 21 patients (51.22%) experienced stable disease, and 4 patients (9.76%) suffered progressive disease; ORR was 39.02% and DCR was 90.24%. In the subgroup of secondary liver cancer, 0 patients (0%) got complete response, 6 patients (33.33%) got partial response, 11 patients (61.11%) experienced stable disease, and 1 patient (5.56%) suffered progressive disease; ORR was 33.33% and DCR was 94.44%. We did not find any difference when comparing the efficacy between primary and secondary liver cancer (P=0.612). The one-year survival rate was 70.73% for primary liver cancer and 61.11% for secondary liver cancer. There was no significant difference between the two groups (P=0.52). For the patients with CR or PR, no factor could predict the efficacy of DEB-TACE. The most common treatment-related adverse reactions were short-term liver function disorders. The symptoms included fever (20.34%), abdomen pain (16.95%), and vomiting (5.08%), all patients with adverse reactions got remission after treatment. Conclusions. DEB-TACE has a promising effect in the treatment of primary or secondary liver cancer. The treatment-related adverse reactions are tolerable.http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2023/5492931
spellingShingle Jiabing Wang
Haoqian Xu
Ying Wang
Long Feng
Fengming Yi
Efficacy and Safety of Drug-Eluting Bead TACE in the Treatment of Primary or Secondary Liver Cancer
Canadian Journal of Gastroenterology and Hepatology
title Efficacy and Safety of Drug-Eluting Bead TACE in the Treatment of Primary or Secondary Liver Cancer
title_full Efficacy and Safety of Drug-Eluting Bead TACE in the Treatment of Primary or Secondary Liver Cancer
title_fullStr Efficacy and Safety of Drug-Eluting Bead TACE in the Treatment of Primary or Secondary Liver Cancer
title_full_unstemmed Efficacy and Safety of Drug-Eluting Bead TACE in the Treatment of Primary or Secondary Liver Cancer
title_short Efficacy and Safety of Drug-Eluting Bead TACE in the Treatment of Primary or Secondary Liver Cancer
title_sort efficacy and safety of drug eluting bead tace in the treatment of primary or secondary liver cancer
url http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2023/5492931
work_keys_str_mv AT jiabingwang efficacyandsafetyofdrugelutingbeadtaceinthetreatmentofprimaryorsecondarylivercancer
AT haoqianxu efficacyandsafetyofdrugelutingbeadtaceinthetreatmentofprimaryorsecondarylivercancer
AT yingwang efficacyandsafetyofdrugelutingbeadtaceinthetreatmentofprimaryorsecondarylivercancer
AT longfeng efficacyandsafetyofdrugelutingbeadtaceinthetreatmentofprimaryorsecondarylivercancer
AT fengmingyi efficacyandsafetyofdrugelutingbeadtaceinthetreatmentofprimaryorsecondarylivercancer