Different modifications of minimally invasive osteosynthesis in pilon fractures: comparative study results

Background. Minimally invasive surgical techniques can reduce the degree of surgical injury during osteosynthesis in peri- and intraarticular pilon fractures. However, these techniques do not always achieve anatomical reduction of the articular component and stable fixation of all columns of the dis...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Boris A. Maiorov, Igor G. Belen’kiy, Gennadii D. Sergeev, Kamoliddin K. Gadoev, Mariya A. Sergeeva
Format: Article
Language:Russian
Published: Vreden Russian Research Institute of Traumatology and Orthopedics 2024-12-01
Series:Travmatologiâ i Ortopediâ Rossii
Subjects:
Online Access:https://journal.rniito.org/jour/article/viewFile/17589/pdf
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
_version_ 1832594200578752512
author Boris A. Maiorov
Igor G. Belen’kiy
Gennadii D. Sergeev
Kamoliddin K. Gadoev
Mariya A. Sergeeva
author_facet Boris A. Maiorov
Igor G. Belen’kiy
Gennadii D. Sergeev
Kamoliddin K. Gadoev
Mariya A. Sergeeva
author_sort Boris A. Maiorov
collection DOAJ
description Background. Minimally invasive surgical techniques can reduce the degree of surgical injury during osteosynthesis in peri- and intraarticular pilon fractures. However, these techniques do not always achieve anatomical reduction of the articular component and stable fixation of all columns of the distal tibia. Aim of the study — to test the hypothesis regarding the clinical advantages of multicolumn fixation for comminuted pilon fractures over traditional single-column fixation. Methods. The study enrolled 55 patients with extra- and intraarticular fractures of the distal tibia and fibula, all of whom underwent minimally invasive osteosynthesis. Patients were divided into two groups based on the number of fixed columns. These groups were comparable in terms of gender and age. The first group consisted of 28 patients who underwent osteosynthesis with one anatomically precontoured plate. The second group consisted of 27 patients who underwent osteosynthesis with two or more plates placed on different tibial columns. The quality of bone fragment reduction was analyzed using control X-rays performed the day after the operation. Functional outcomes were evaluated according to the AOFAS scale at 6 and 12 months post-operation. The incidence of early and delayed complications of osteosynthesis was also determined. Results. No statistically significant difference was found between the two study groups in terms of quality of reduction (p = 0.23). The median functional outcome score in the first group at 6 months was 63 points [IQR 50.00-73.00] and at 12 months was 74 points [IQR 65.00-83.25]. In the second group, the median scores were 75 points [IQR 67.50-81.00] and 85 points [IQR 71.00-94.50], respectively. Multicolumn fixation of the pilon fracture resulted in statistically significantly higher functional outcome scores at both follow-up periods: at 6 months (p = 0.015) and at 12 months (p = 0.028). The probability of complications in the first group was 4.4 times higher than in the second group: OR = 4.444 (95% CI 1.066-18.528). Conclusion. Multicolumn fixation of complete periarticular and intraarticular pilon fractures leads to better functional results compared to single-column fixation. It also reduces the risk of complications due to increased stability of the fragment fixation and the resistance of the implant-bone system to physiological stress.
format Article
id doaj-art-363b2b454b4e417faea29eb9ea04ef90
institution Kabale University
issn 2311-2905
2542-0933
language Russian
publishDate 2024-12-01
publisher Vreden Russian Research Institute of Traumatology and Orthopedics
record_format Article
series Travmatologiâ i Ortopediâ Rossii
spelling doaj-art-363b2b454b4e417faea29eb9ea04ef902025-01-20T02:43:24ZrusVreden Russian Research Institute of Traumatology and OrthopedicsTravmatologiâ i Ortopediâ Rossii2311-29052542-09332024-12-01304475910.17816/2311-2905-175891385Different modifications of minimally invasive osteosynthesis in pilon fractures: comparative study resultsBoris A. Maiorov0https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1559-1571Igor G. Belen’kiy1https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9951-5183Gennadii D. Sergeev2https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8898-503XKamoliddin K. Gadoev3https://orcid.org/0009-0003-5565-0721Mariya A. Sergeeva4https://orcid.org/0009-0003-3255-1771St. Petersburg I.I. Dzhanelidze Research Institute of Emergency MedicineSt. Petersburg I.I. Dzhanelidze Research Institute of Emergency MedicineSt. Petersburg I.I. Dzhanelidze Research Institute of Emergency MedicineSt. Petersburg State UniversitySt. Petersburg State UniversityBackground. Minimally invasive surgical techniques can reduce the degree of surgical injury during osteosynthesis in peri- and intraarticular pilon fractures. However, these techniques do not always achieve anatomical reduction of the articular component and stable fixation of all columns of the distal tibia. Aim of the study — to test the hypothesis regarding the clinical advantages of multicolumn fixation for comminuted pilon fractures over traditional single-column fixation. Methods. The study enrolled 55 patients with extra- and intraarticular fractures of the distal tibia and fibula, all of whom underwent minimally invasive osteosynthesis. Patients were divided into two groups based on the number of fixed columns. These groups were comparable in terms of gender and age. The first group consisted of 28 patients who underwent osteosynthesis with one anatomically precontoured plate. The second group consisted of 27 patients who underwent osteosynthesis with two or more plates placed on different tibial columns. The quality of bone fragment reduction was analyzed using control X-rays performed the day after the operation. Functional outcomes were evaluated according to the AOFAS scale at 6 and 12 months post-operation. The incidence of early and delayed complications of osteosynthesis was also determined. Results. No statistically significant difference was found between the two study groups in terms of quality of reduction (p = 0.23). The median functional outcome score in the first group at 6 months was 63 points [IQR 50.00-73.00] and at 12 months was 74 points [IQR 65.00-83.25]. In the second group, the median scores were 75 points [IQR 67.50-81.00] and 85 points [IQR 71.00-94.50], respectively. Multicolumn fixation of the pilon fracture resulted in statistically significantly higher functional outcome scores at both follow-up periods: at 6 months (p = 0.015) and at 12 months (p = 0.028). The probability of complications in the first group was 4.4 times higher than in the second group: OR = 4.444 (95% CI 1.066-18.528). Conclusion. Multicolumn fixation of complete periarticular and intraarticular pilon fractures leads to better functional results compared to single-column fixation. It also reduces the risk of complications due to increased stability of the fragment fixation and the resistance of the implant-bone system to physiological stress.https://journal.rniito.org/jour/article/viewFile/17589/pdfminimally invasive osteosynthesistibial fracturepilon fracturemulticolumn fixationcomplications of osteosynthesis
spellingShingle Boris A. Maiorov
Igor G. Belen’kiy
Gennadii D. Sergeev
Kamoliddin K. Gadoev
Mariya A. Sergeeva
Different modifications of minimally invasive osteosynthesis in pilon fractures: comparative study results
Travmatologiâ i Ortopediâ Rossii
minimally invasive osteosynthesis
tibial fracture
pilon fracture
multicolumn fixation
complications of osteosynthesis
title Different modifications of minimally invasive osteosynthesis in pilon fractures: comparative study results
title_full Different modifications of minimally invasive osteosynthesis in pilon fractures: comparative study results
title_fullStr Different modifications of minimally invasive osteosynthesis in pilon fractures: comparative study results
title_full_unstemmed Different modifications of minimally invasive osteosynthesis in pilon fractures: comparative study results
title_short Different modifications of minimally invasive osteosynthesis in pilon fractures: comparative study results
title_sort different modifications of minimally invasive osteosynthesis in pilon fractures comparative study results
topic minimally invasive osteosynthesis
tibial fracture
pilon fracture
multicolumn fixation
complications of osteosynthesis
url https://journal.rniito.org/jour/article/viewFile/17589/pdf
work_keys_str_mv AT borisamaiorov differentmodificationsofminimallyinvasiveosteosynthesisinpilonfracturescomparativestudyresults
AT igorgbelenkiy differentmodificationsofminimallyinvasiveosteosynthesisinpilonfracturescomparativestudyresults
AT gennadiidsergeev differentmodificationsofminimallyinvasiveosteosynthesisinpilonfracturescomparativestudyresults
AT kamoliddinkgadoev differentmodificationsofminimallyinvasiveosteosynthesisinpilonfracturescomparativestudyresults
AT mariyaasergeeva differentmodificationsofminimallyinvasiveosteosynthesisinpilonfracturescomparativestudyresults