Community-based models of care for management of type 2 diabetes mellitus among non-pregnant adults in sub-Saharan Africa: A scoping review.

<h4>Introduction</h4>The prevalence of type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) and associated morbidity and mortality are increasing in sub-Saharan Africa (SSA). To facilitate access to quality care and improve treatment outcomes, there is a need for innovative community care models and optimize...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Emmanuel Firima, Lucia Gonzalez, Fabiola Ursprung, Elena Robinson, Jacqueline Huber, Jennifer M Belus, Fabian Raeber, Ravi Gupta, Gibrilla F Deen, Alain Amstutz, Bailah Leigh, Maja Weisser, Niklaus Daniel Labhardt
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Public Library of Science (PLoS) 2023-01-01
Series:PLoS ONE
Online Access:https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article/file?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0278353&type=printable
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
_version_ 1832540099417473024
author Emmanuel Firima
Lucia Gonzalez
Fabiola Ursprung
Elena Robinson
Jacqueline Huber
Jennifer M Belus
Fabian Raeber
Ravi Gupta
Gibrilla F Deen
Alain Amstutz
Bailah Leigh
Maja Weisser
Niklaus Daniel Labhardt
author_facet Emmanuel Firima
Lucia Gonzalez
Fabiola Ursprung
Elena Robinson
Jacqueline Huber
Jennifer M Belus
Fabian Raeber
Ravi Gupta
Gibrilla F Deen
Alain Amstutz
Bailah Leigh
Maja Weisser
Niklaus Daniel Labhardt
author_sort Emmanuel Firima
collection DOAJ
description <h4>Introduction</h4>The prevalence of type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) and associated morbidity and mortality are increasing in sub-Saharan Africa (SSA). To facilitate access to quality care and improve treatment outcomes, there is a need for innovative community care models and optimized use of non-physician healthcare workers bringing diagnosis and care closer to patients' homes.<h4>Aim</h4>We aimed to describe with a scoping review different models of community-based care for non-pregnant adults with T2DM in SSA, and to synthesize the outcomes in terms of engagement in care, blood sugar control, acceptability, and end-organ damage. We further aimed to critically appraise the different models of care and compare community-based to facility-based care if data were available.<h4>Methods</h4>We searched Medline, Embase, Cumulative Index to Nursing and Allied Health Literature (CINAHL) and Scopus, supplemented with backward and forward citation searches. We included cohort studies, randomized trials and case-control studies that reported on non-pregnant individuals diagnosed with T2DM in SSA, who received a substantial part of care in the community. Only studies which reported at least one of our outcomes of interest were included. A narrative analysis was done, and comparisons made between community-based and facility-based models, where within-study comparison was reported.<h4>Results</h4>We retrieved 5,335 unique studies, four of which met our inclusion criteria. Most studies were excluded because interventions were facility-based; community care interventions described in the studies were only add-on features of a primarily facility-based care; and studies did not report outcomes of interest. The included studies reported on a total of 383 individuals with T2DM. Three different community care models were identified. 1) A community-initiated model where diagnosis, treatment and monitoring occurred primarily in the community. This model reported a higher linkage and engagement in care at 9 months compared to the corresponding facility model, but only slight reductions of average blood glucose levels at six months compared to baseline. 2) A facility-originated community model where after treatment initiation, a substantial part of follow-up was offered at community level. Two studies reported such a model of care, both had as core component home-delivery of medication. Acceptability of this approach was high. But neither study found improved T2DM control when compared to facility care 3) An eHealth model with high acceptability scores for both patients and care providers, and an absolute 1.76% reduction in average HbA1c levels at two months compared to baseline. There were no reported outcomes on end-organ damage. All four studies were rated as being at high risk for bias.<h4>Conclusion</h4>Evidence on models of care for persons with T2DM in SSA where a substantial part of care is shifted to the community is scant. Whereas available literature indicates high acceptability of community-based care, we found no conclusive data on their effectiveness in controlling blood sugar and preventing complications. Evidence from larger scale studies, ideally randomized trials with clinically relevant endpoints is needed before roll-out of community-based T2DM care can be recommended in SSA.
format Article
id doaj-art-35a5f201a56d4b979da89fd8bbf430b1
institution Kabale University
issn 1932-6203
language English
publishDate 2023-01-01
publisher Public Library of Science (PLoS)
record_format Article
series PLoS ONE
spelling doaj-art-35a5f201a56d4b979da89fd8bbf430b12025-02-05T05:32:35ZengPublic Library of Science (PLoS)PLoS ONE1932-62032023-01-011811e027835310.1371/journal.pone.0278353Community-based models of care for management of type 2 diabetes mellitus among non-pregnant adults in sub-Saharan Africa: A scoping review.Emmanuel FirimaLucia GonzalezFabiola UrsprungElena RobinsonJacqueline HuberJennifer M BelusFabian RaeberRavi GuptaGibrilla F DeenAlain AmstutzBailah LeighMaja WeisserNiklaus Daniel Labhardt<h4>Introduction</h4>The prevalence of type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) and associated morbidity and mortality are increasing in sub-Saharan Africa (SSA). To facilitate access to quality care and improve treatment outcomes, there is a need for innovative community care models and optimized use of non-physician healthcare workers bringing diagnosis and care closer to patients' homes.<h4>Aim</h4>We aimed to describe with a scoping review different models of community-based care for non-pregnant adults with T2DM in SSA, and to synthesize the outcomes in terms of engagement in care, blood sugar control, acceptability, and end-organ damage. We further aimed to critically appraise the different models of care and compare community-based to facility-based care if data were available.<h4>Methods</h4>We searched Medline, Embase, Cumulative Index to Nursing and Allied Health Literature (CINAHL) and Scopus, supplemented with backward and forward citation searches. We included cohort studies, randomized trials and case-control studies that reported on non-pregnant individuals diagnosed with T2DM in SSA, who received a substantial part of care in the community. Only studies which reported at least one of our outcomes of interest were included. A narrative analysis was done, and comparisons made between community-based and facility-based models, where within-study comparison was reported.<h4>Results</h4>We retrieved 5,335 unique studies, four of which met our inclusion criteria. Most studies were excluded because interventions were facility-based; community care interventions described in the studies were only add-on features of a primarily facility-based care; and studies did not report outcomes of interest. The included studies reported on a total of 383 individuals with T2DM. Three different community care models were identified. 1) A community-initiated model where diagnosis, treatment and monitoring occurred primarily in the community. This model reported a higher linkage and engagement in care at 9 months compared to the corresponding facility model, but only slight reductions of average blood glucose levels at six months compared to baseline. 2) A facility-originated community model where after treatment initiation, a substantial part of follow-up was offered at community level. Two studies reported such a model of care, both had as core component home-delivery of medication. Acceptability of this approach was high. But neither study found improved T2DM control when compared to facility care 3) An eHealth model with high acceptability scores for both patients and care providers, and an absolute 1.76% reduction in average HbA1c levels at two months compared to baseline. There were no reported outcomes on end-organ damage. All four studies were rated as being at high risk for bias.<h4>Conclusion</h4>Evidence on models of care for persons with T2DM in SSA where a substantial part of care is shifted to the community is scant. Whereas available literature indicates high acceptability of community-based care, we found no conclusive data on their effectiveness in controlling blood sugar and preventing complications. Evidence from larger scale studies, ideally randomized trials with clinically relevant endpoints is needed before roll-out of community-based T2DM care can be recommended in SSA.https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article/file?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0278353&type=printable
spellingShingle Emmanuel Firima
Lucia Gonzalez
Fabiola Ursprung
Elena Robinson
Jacqueline Huber
Jennifer M Belus
Fabian Raeber
Ravi Gupta
Gibrilla F Deen
Alain Amstutz
Bailah Leigh
Maja Weisser
Niklaus Daniel Labhardt
Community-based models of care for management of type 2 diabetes mellitus among non-pregnant adults in sub-Saharan Africa: A scoping review.
PLoS ONE
title Community-based models of care for management of type 2 diabetes mellitus among non-pregnant adults in sub-Saharan Africa: A scoping review.
title_full Community-based models of care for management of type 2 diabetes mellitus among non-pregnant adults in sub-Saharan Africa: A scoping review.
title_fullStr Community-based models of care for management of type 2 diabetes mellitus among non-pregnant adults in sub-Saharan Africa: A scoping review.
title_full_unstemmed Community-based models of care for management of type 2 diabetes mellitus among non-pregnant adults in sub-Saharan Africa: A scoping review.
title_short Community-based models of care for management of type 2 diabetes mellitus among non-pregnant adults in sub-Saharan Africa: A scoping review.
title_sort community based models of care for management of type 2 diabetes mellitus among non pregnant adults in sub saharan africa a scoping review
url https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article/file?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0278353&type=printable
work_keys_str_mv AT emmanuelfirima communitybasedmodelsofcareformanagementoftype2diabetesmellitusamongnonpregnantadultsinsubsaharanafricaascopingreview
AT luciagonzalez communitybasedmodelsofcareformanagementoftype2diabetesmellitusamongnonpregnantadultsinsubsaharanafricaascopingreview
AT fabiolaursprung communitybasedmodelsofcareformanagementoftype2diabetesmellitusamongnonpregnantadultsinsubsaharanafricaascopingreview
AT elenarobinson communitybasedmodelsofcareformanagementoftype2diabetesmellitusamongnonpregnantadultsinsubsaharanafricaascopingreview
AT jacquelinehuber communitybasedmodelsofcareformanagementoftype2diabetesmellitusamongnonpregnantadultsinsubsaharanafricaascopingreview
AT jennifermbelus communitybasedmodelsofcareformanagementoftype2diabetesmellitusamongnonpregnantadultsinsubsaharanafricaascopingreview
AT fabianraeber communitybasedmodelsofcareformanagementoftype2diabetesmellitusamongnonpregnantadultsinsubsaharanafricaascopingreview
AT ravigupta communitybasedmodelsofcareformanagementoftype2diabetesmellitusamongnonpregnantadultsinsubsaharanafricaascopingreview
AT gibrillafdeen communitybasedmodelsofcareformanagementoftype2diabetesmellitusamongnonpregnantadultsinsubsaharanafricaascopingreview
AT alainamstutz communitybasedmodelsofcareformanagementoftype2diabetesmellitusamongnonpregnantadultsinsubsaharanafricaascopingreview
AT bailahleigh communitybasedmodelsofcareformanagementoftype2diabetesmellitusamongnonpregnantadultsinsubsaharanafricaascopingreview
AT majaweisser communitybasedmodelsofcareformanagementoftype2diabetesmellitusamongnonpregnantadultsinsubsaharanafricaascopingreview
AT niklausdaniellabhardt communitybasedmodelsofcareformanagementoftype2diabetesmellitusamongnonpregnantadultsinsubsaharanafricaascopingreview