Ben Tilghman and the philosophy of art: in defense of the «last of the mohicans»
The article considers the view on the art of one of the most prominent figure of antiessentialism in modern art philosophy — Ben Tilghman. The radicality of his view lies in the denial of all art theories. According to Tilghman, the role of art theory is excessive and sometimes even harmful. When...
Saved in:
| Main Author: | |
|---|---|
| Format: | Article |
| Language: | English |
| Published: |
Omsk State Technical University, Federal State Autonomous Educational Institution of Higher Education
2019-09-01
|
| Series: | Омский научный вестник: Серия "Общество. История. Современность" |
| Subjects: | |
| Online Access: | https://www.omgtu.ru/general_information/media_omgtu/journal_of_omsk_research_journal/files/arhiv/2019/%D0%A2.%204,%20%E2%84%96%203%20(%D0%9E%D0%98%D0%A1)/112-118%20%D0%9D%D0%B5%D1%85%D0%B0%D0%B5%D0%B2%D0%B0%20%D0%98.%20%D0%9D..pdf |
| Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
| Summary: | The article considers the view on the art of one of the most prominent figure of
antiessentialism in modern art philosophy — Ben Tilghman. The radicality of his view
lies in the denial of all art theories. According to Tilghman, the role of art theory is
excessive and sometimes even harmful. When solving purely practical problems, art
requires a practical approach rather than theoretical. Critical analysis of this view on
the nature of art allows us to show the true source of its radicalism — the lack of
linguistic feeling, which does not give Tilghman to strictly follow the language game
accepted by him, while maintaining the continuity of his own reflections |
|---|---|
| ISSN: | 2542-0488 2541-7983 |