Practitioner, patient and public views on the acceptability of mobile stroke units in England and Wales: A mixed methods study.
<h4>Background</h4>Evidence for Mobile Stroke Units (MSUs) demonstrates that onset to treatment times for intravenous thrombolysis can be reduced and access to mechanical thrombectomy might be improved. Despite growing use of MSUs internationally, to date there have been no studies in NH...
Saved in:
| Main Authors: | , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , |
|---|---|
| Format: | Article |
| Language: | English |
| Published: |
Public Library of Science (PLoS)
2025-01-01
|
| Series: | PLoS ONE |
| Online Access: | https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0310071 |
| Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
| _version_ | 1832540309088632832 |
|---|---|
| author | Lisa Moseley Peter McMeekin Christopher Price Lisa Shaw Anna Laws Michael Allen Gary A Ford Martin James Stephen McCarthy Graham McClelland Laura J Park Kerry Pearn Daniel Phillips Phil White David Wilson Jason Scott |
| author_facet | Lisa Moseley Peter McMeekin Christopher Price Lisa Shaw Anna Laws Michael Allen Gary A Ford Martin James Stephen McCarthy Graham McClelland Laura J Park Kerry Pearn Daniel Phillips Phil White David Wilson Jason Scott |
| author_sort | Lisa Moseley |
| collection | DOAJ |
| description | <h4>Background</h4>Evidence for Mobile Stroke Units (MSUs) demonstrates that onset to treatment times for intravenous thrombolysis can be reduced and access to mechanical thrombectomy might be improved. Despite growing use of MSUs internationally, to date there have been no studies in NHS England and NHS Wales exploring the acceptability of MSUs to clinicians, patient and public representatives and other key stakeholders, which are important when considering potential feasibility and implementation.<h4>Methods</h4>This study used a mixed methods design with a cross-sectional survey and qualitative workshops and interviews between October 2023 to May 2024. Survey data were collected from clinicians involved in emergency stroke care. Qualitative data involved clinical and non-clinical professionals involved in stroke care alongside patient and public representatives with experience of stroke. Survey data were descriptively analysed while content analysis was used on open-ended questions. Qualitative data were thematically analysed, prior to triangulation using a convergent coding matrix.<h4>Results</h4>The study results, drawn from 25 respondents to the survey and 21 participants in qualitative workshops, found that almost all participants had positive affective attitudes to the concept of MSUs. However, several key areas of concern were identified that need to be addressed prior to implementing MSUs. These concerns included how MSUs would be staffed; whether and how telemedicine could contribute; the types of economic impacts; extent to which triage systems could accurately identify stroke patients for MSUs to attend; where the base location and geographic coverage of MSUs should be, the impact of MSUs on equitable access to stroke care, and how to improve public awareness of MSUs.<h4>Conclusion</h4>Whilst MSUs are mostly acceptable to key stakeholders, numerous areas of concern need to be addressed prior to MSU implementation. We recommend further research to address these issues prior to implementation in the NHS. |
| format | Article |
| id | doaj-art-34d98d58de1e4cba93bc048a38689842 |
| institution | Kabale University |
| issn | 1932-6203 |
| language | English |
| publishDate | 2025-01-01 |
| publisher | Public Library of Science (PLoS) |
| record_format | Article |
| series | PLoS ONE |
| spelling | doaj-art-34d98d58de1e4cba93bc048a386898422025-02-05T05:31:07ZengPublic Library of Science (PLoS)PLoS ONE1932-62032025-01-01201e031007110.1371/journal.pone.0310071Practitioner, patient and public views on the acceptability of mobile stroke units in England and Wales: A mixed methods study.Lisa MoseleyPeter McMeekinChristopher PriceLisa ShawAnna LawsMichael AllenGary A FordMartin JamesStephen McCarthyGraham McClellandLaura J ParkKerry PearnDaniel PhillipsPhil WhiteDavid WilsonJason Scott<h4>Background</h4>Evidence for Mobile Stroke Units (MSUs) demonstrates that onset to treatment times for intravenous thrombolysis can be reduced and access to mechanical thrombectomy might be improved. Despite growing use of MSUs internationally, to date there have been no studies in NHS England and NHS Wales exploring the acceptability of MSUs to clinicians, patient and public representatives and other key stakeholders, which are important when considering potential feasibility and implementation.<h4>Methods</h4>This study used a mixed methods design with a cross-sectional survey and qualitative workshops and interviews between October 2023 to May 2024. Survey data were collected from clinicians involved in emergency stroke care. Qualitative data involved clinical and non-clinical professionals involved in stroke care alongside patient and public representatives with experience of stroke. Survey data were descriptively analysed while content analysis was used on open-ended questions. Qualitative data were thematically analysed, prior to triangulation using a convergent coding matrix.<h4>Results</h4>The study results, drawn from 25 respondents to the survey and 21 participants in qualitative workshops, found that almost all participants had positive affective attitudes to the concept of MSUs. However, several key areas of concern were identified that need to be addressed prior to implementing MSUs. These concerns included how MSUs would be staffed; whether and how telemedicine could contribute; the types of economic impacts; extent to which triage systems could accurately identify stroke patients for MSUs to attend; where the base location and geographic coverage of MSUs should be, the impact of MSUs on equitable access to stroke care, and how to improve public awareness of MSUs.<h4>Conclusion</h4>Whilst MSUs are mostly acceptable to key stakeholders, numerous areas of concern need to be addressed prior to MSU implementation. We recommend further research to address these issues prior to implementation in the NHS.https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0310071 |
| spellingShingle | Lisa Moseley Peter McMeekin Christopher Price Lisa Shaw Anna Laws Michael Allen Gary A Ford Martin James Stephen McCarthy Graham McClelland Laura J Park Kerry Pearn Daniel Phillips Phil White David Wilson Jason Scott Practitioner, patient and public views on the acceptability of mobile stroke units in England and Wales: A mixed methods study. PLoS ONE |
| title | Practitioner, patient and public views on the acceptability of mobile stroke units in England and Wales: A mixed methods study. |
| title_full | Practitioner, patient and public views on the acceptability of mobile stroke units in England and Wales: A mixed methods study. |
| title_fullStr | Practitioner, patient and public views on the acceptability of mobile stroke units in England and Wales: A mixed methods study. |
| title_full_unstemmed | Practitioner, patient and public views on the acceptability of mobile stroke units in England and Wales: A mixed methods study. |
| title_short | Practitioner, patient and public views on the acceptability of mobile stroke units in England and Wales: A mixed methods study. |
| title_sort | practitioner patient and public views on the acceptability of mobile stroke units in england and wales a mixed methods study |
| url | https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0310071 |
| work_keys_str_mv | AT lisamoseley practitionerpatientandpublicviewsontheacceptabilityofmobilestrokeunitsinenglandandwalesamixedmethodsstudy AT petermcmeekin practitionerpatientandpublicviewsontheacceptabilityofmobilestrokeunitsinenglandandwalesamixedmethodsstudy AT christopherprice practitionerpatientandpublicviewsontheacceptabilityofmobilestrokeunitsinenglandandwalesamixedmethodsstudy AT lisashaw practitionerpatientandpublicviewsontheacceptabilityofmobilestrokeunitsinenglandandwalesamixedmethodsstudy AT annalaws practitionerpatientandpublicviewsontheacceptabilityofmobilestrokeunitsinenglandandwalesamixedmethodsstudy AT michaelallen practitionerpatientandpublicviewsontheacceptabilityofmobilestrokeunitsinenglandandwalesamixedmethodsstudy AT garyaford practitionerpatientandpublicviewsontheacceptabilityofmobilestrokeunitsinenglandandwalesamixedmethodsstudy AT martinjames practitionerpatientandpublicviewsontheacceptabilityofmobilestrokeunitsinenglandandwalesamixedmethodsstudy AT stephenmccarthy practitionerpatientandpublicviewsontheacceptabilityofmobilestrokeunitsinenglandandwalesamixedmethodsstudy AT grahammcclelland practitionerpatientandpublicviewsontheacceptabilityofmobilestrokeunitsinenglandandwalesamixedmethodsstudy AT laurajpark practitionerpatientandpublicviewsontheacceptabilityofmobilestrokeunitsinenglandandwalesamixedmethodsstudy AT kerrypearn practitionerpatientandpublicviewsontheacceptabilityofmobilestrokeunitsinenglandandwalesamixedmethodsstudy AT danielphillips practitionerpatientandpublicviewsontheacceptabilityofmobilestrokeunitsinenglandandwalesamixedmethodsstudy AT philwhite practitionerpatientandpublicviewsontheacceptabilityofmobilestrokeunitsinenglandandwalesamixedmethodsstudy AT davidwilson practitionerpatientandpublicviewsontheacceptabilityofmobilestrokeunitsinenglandandwalesamixedmethodsstudy AT jasonscott practitionerpatientandpublicviewsontheacceptabilityofmobilestrokeunitsinenglandandwalesamixedmethodsstudy |