Biomechanical Effect of Orthodontic Treatment of Canine Retraction by Using Metallic Orthodontic Mini-Implant (OMI) Covered with Various Angles of Revolving Cap

Objective. This study evaluated the biomechanical effects of a metallic orthodontic mini-implant (OMI) covered with various types of angled revolving cap on the peri-OMI bone and the canine periodontal ligament (PDL) by finite element (FE) analyses. Materials and Methods. Three-dimensional FE models...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Kuson Tuntiwong, Jui-Ting Hsu, Shih-Guang Yang, Jian-Hong Yu, Heng-Li Huang
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Wiley 2021-01-01
Series:Applied Bionics and Biomechanics
Online Access:http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2021/9952392
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
_version_ 1832548807161675776
author Kuson Tuntiwong
Jui-Ting Hsu
Shih-Guang Yang
Jian-Hong Yu
Heng-Li Huang
author_facet Kuson Tuntiwong
Jui-Ting Hsu
Shih-Guang Yang
Jian-Hong Yu
Heng-Li Huang
author_sort Kuson Tuntiwong
collection DOAJ
description Objective. This study evaluated the biomechanical effects of a metallic orthodontic mini-implant (OMI) covered with various types of angled revolving cap on the peri-OMI bone and the canine periodontal ligament (PDL) by finite element (FE) analyses. Materials and Methods. Three-dimensional FE models included comprised cortical bone and cancellous bone of the maxilla, and the OMIs were created. The forces (0.98 N) pulled in both the canine hook and the revolving cap, pulling towards each other in both directions as loading conditions. The upper surface of the maxilla was fixed as a boundary condition. Results. The bone stresses were increasing in the models by using OMI covered with a revolving cap as compared with that in the conventional model (in which only the OMI was placed). However, no obvious differences in bone stresses were observed among the models with various types of angled revolving cap. The minimum principal strain in the canine PDL was highest for condition 180T, followed by condition 180L. However, the maximum differences in the values between each experimental model and the conventional model were around 5%. Conclusion. This study showed no obvious effects in decreasing or increasing stress/strain in bone and PDL by using various types of angled revolving cap covered metallic mini-implant in orthodontic treatment of canine retraction.
format Article
id doaj-art-34d7b9ea8d72499eac3f927ca2b0119c
institution Kabale University
issn 1176-2322
1754-2103
language English
publishDate 2021-01-01
publisher Wiley
record_format Article
series Applied Bionics and Biomechanics
spelling doaj-art-34d7b9ea8d72499eac3f927ca2b0119c2025-02-03T06:12:53ZengWileyApplied Bionics and Biomechanics1176-23221754-21032021-01-01202110.1155/2021/99523929952392Biomechanical Effect of Orthodontic Treatment of Canine Retraction by Using Metallic Orthodontic Mini-Implant (OMI) Covered with Various Angles of Revolving CapKuson Tuntiwong0Jui-Ting Hsu1Shih-Guang Yang2Jian-Hong Yu3Heng-Li Huang4School of Dentistry, China Medical University, Taichung 40402, TaiwanSchool of Dentistry, China Medical University, Taichung 40402, TaiwanMaster Program for Biomedical Engineering, China Medical University, Taichung 40402, TaiwanSchool of Dentistry, China Medical University, Taichung 40402, TaiwanSchool of Dentistry, China Medical University, Taichung 40402, TaiwanObjective. This study evaluated the biomechanical effects of a metallic orthodontic mini-implant (OMI) covered with various types of angled revolving cap on the peri-OMI bone and the canine periodontal ligament (PDL) by finite element (FE) analyses. Materials and Methods. Three-dimensional FE models included comprised cortical bone and cancellous bone of the maxilla, and the OMIs were created. The forces (0.98 N) pulled in both the canine hook and the revolving cap, pulling towards each other in both directions as loading conditions. The upper surface of the maxilla was fixed as a boundary condition. Results. The bone stresses were increasing in the models by using OMI covered with a revolving cap as compared with that in the conventional model (in which only the OMI was placed). However, no obvious differences in bone stresses were observed among the models with various types of angled revolving cap. The minimum principal strain in the canine PDL was highest for condition 180T, followed by condition 180L. However, the maximum differences in the values between each experimental model and the conventional model were around 5%. Conclusion. This study showed no obvious effects in decreasing or increasing stress/strain in bone and PDL by using various types of angled revolving cap covered metallic mini-implant in orthodontic treatment of canine retraction.http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2021/9952392
spellingShingle Kuson Tuntiwong
Jui-Ting Hsu
Shih-Guang Yang
Jian-Hong Yu
Heng-Li Huang
Biomechanical Effect of Orthodontic Treatment of Canine Retraction by Using Metallic Orthodontic Mini-Implant (OMI) Covered with Various Angles of Revolving Cap
Applied Bionics and Biomechanics
title Biomechanical Effect of Orthodontic Treatment of Canine Retraction by Using Metallic Orthodontic Mini-Implant (OMI) Covered with Various Angles of Revolving Cap
title_full Biomechanical Effect of Orthodontic Treatment of Canine Retraction by Using Metallic Orthodontic Mini-Implant (OMI) Covered with Various Angles of Revolving Cap
title_fullStr Biomechanical Effect of Orthodontic Treatment of Canine Retraction by Using Metallic Orthodontic Mini-Implant (OMI) Covered with Various Angles of Revolving Cap
title_full_unstemmed Biomechanical Effect of Orthodontic Treatment of Canine Retraction by Using Metallic Orthodontic Mini-Implant (OMI) Covered with Various Angles of Revolving Cap
title_short Biomechanical Effect of Orthodontic Treatment of Canine Retraction by Using Metallic Orthodontic Mini-Implant (OMI) Covered with Various Angles of Revolving Cap
title_sort biomechanical effect of orthodontic treatment of canine retraction by using metallic orthodontic mini implant omi covered with various angles of revolving cap
url http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2021/9952392
work_keys_str_mv AT kusontuntiwong biomechanicaleffectoforthodontictreatmentofcanineretractionbyusingmetallicorthodonticminiimplantomicoveredwithvariousanglesofrevolvingcap
AT juitinghsu biomechanicaleffectoforthodontictreatmentofcanineretractionbyusingmetallicorthodonticminiimplantomicoveredwithvariousanglesofrevolvingcap
AT shihguangyang biomechanicaleffectoforthodontictreatmentofcanineretractionbyusingmetallicorthodonticminiimplantomicoveredwithvariousanglesofrevolvingcap
AT jianhongyu biomechanicaleffectoforthodontictreatmentofcanineretractionbyusingmetallicorthodonticminiimplantomicoveredwithvariousanglesofrevolvingcap
AT henglihuang biomechanicaleffectoforthodontictreatmentofcanineretractionbyusingmetallicorthodonticminiimplantomicoveredwithvariousanglesofrevolvingcap