STD Training in Canadian Medical Schools

OBJECTIVE: The emergence of the acquired immune deficiency syndrome in 1981 and the consequent publicity surrounding sexual behaviour has increased the likelihood that patients will seek medical advice. Sexually transmitted disease (STD) teaching and postgraduate medical programs in Canadian schools...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Jo-Anne A Doherty, A Gordon Jessamine
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Wiley 1992-01-01
Series:Canadian Journal of Infectious Diseases
Online Access:http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/1992/419108
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
_version_ 1832556265264381952
author Jo-Anne A Doherty
A Gordon Jessamine
author_facet Jo-Anne A Doherty
A Gordon Jessamine
author_sort Jo-Anne A Doherty
collection DOAJ
description OBJECTIVE: The emergence of the acquired immune deficiency syndrome in 1981 and the consequent publicity surrounding sexual behaviour has increased the likelihood that patients will seek medical advice. Sexually transmitted disease (STD) teaching and postgraduate medical programs in Canadian schools of medicine have not been adequately documented. Accordingly, the Laboratory Centre for Disease Control. Department of National Health and Welfare, sought to determine the magnitude and scope of STD training in these schools. DESIGN: A four page questionnaire sought information on preclinical, clinical and residency training in terms of the number of classroom and laboratory hours of instruction, the subspecialty responsible for providing the training, and the clinical ‘hands on’ experience of the teachers: each respondent was also asked to assess the quality and scope of instruction provided at his/her medical school. SETTING/PARTICIPANTS: The questionnaire was mailed to the Dean of each of the 16 schools of medicine in Canada: it was requested that the questionnaire be forwarded to and completed by the person responsible for STD training at the university. RESULTS: Thirteen schools (81%) completed the questionnaire. Each school indicated that some STD instruction was provided at the undergraduate level: the mean number of hours of classroom instruction was 6.1. Physicians with STD clinical ‘hands on’ experience were responsible for teaching in 12 schools. Infectious disease residents spent 4 to 80 h on STDs, while those from other residency programs where STD was not an elective spent 2 to 8 h. Each medical school was asked to provide an evaluation of its program. Only three respondents considered their STD training program adequate. The majority of schools responded that infectious disease residents received sufficient training but the training offered medical students and residents in other programs was less than adequate. The quality of teaching was considered ‘excellent’ in three schools, ‘good’ in nine, and ‘poorly co-ordinated’ in one. CONCLUSIONS: There is no simple solution to ensure that every physician in Canada receives sufficient clinical training in STDs. Collaborative and cooperative efforts by federal, provincial and local governments, professional societies, licensing bodies, medical schools, residency programs, STD clinical directors and provincial and territorial directors of STD control, should be encouraged.
format Article
id doaj-art-34b155b865f04e9ba1e80fb50a03e92f
institution Kabale University
issn 1180-2332
language English
publishDate 1992-01-01
publisher Wiley
record_format Article
series Canadian Journal of Infectious Diseases
spelling doaj-art-34b155b865f04e9ba1e80fb50a03e92f2025-02-03T05:45:52ZengWileyCanadian Journal of Infectious Diseases1180-23321992-01-013311812110.1155/1992/419108STD Training in Canadian Medical SchoolsJo-Anne A Doherty0A Gordon Jessamine1Division of STD Control, Bureau of Communicable Disease Epidemiology, Laboratory Centre for Disease Control, Department of National Health and Welfare, Ottawa, Ontario, CanadaDivision of STD Control, Bureau of Communicable Disease Epidemiology, Laboratory Centre for Disease Control, Department of National Health and Welfare, Ottawa, Ontario, CanadaOBJECTIVE: The emergence of the acquired immune deficiency syndrome in 1981 and the consequent publicity surrounding sexual behaviour has increased the likelihood that patients will seek medical advice. Sexually transmitted disease (STD) teaching and postgraduate medical programs in Canadian schools of medicine have not been adequately documented. Accordingly, the Laboratory Centre for Disease Control. Department of National Health and Welfare, sought to determine the magnitude and scope of STD training in these schools. DESIGN: A four page questionnaire sought information on preclinical, clinical and residency training in terms of the number of classroom and laboratory hours of instruction, the subspecialty responsible for providing the training, and the clinical ‘hands on’ experience of the teachers: each respondent was also asked to assess the quality and scope of instruction provided at his/her medical school. SETTING/PARTICIPANTS: The questionnaire was mailed to the Dean of each of the 16 schools of medicine in Canada: it was requested that the questionnaire be forwarded to and completed by the person responsible for STD training at the university. RESULTS: Thirteen schools (81%) completed the questionnaire. Each school indicated that some STD instruction was provided at the undergraduate level: the mean number of hours of classroom instruction was 6.1. Physicians with STD clinical ‘hands on’ experience were responsible for teaching in 12 schools. Infectious disease residents spent 4 to 80 h on STDs, while those from other residency programs where STD was not an elective spent 2 to 8 h. Each medical school was asked to provide an evaluation of its program. Only three respondents considered their STD training program adequate. The majority of schools responded that infectious disease residents received sufficient training but the training offered medical students and residents in other programs was less than adequate. The quality of teaching was considered ‘excellent’ in three schools, ‘good’ in nine, and ‘poorly co-ordinated’ in one. CONCLUSIONS: There is no simple solution to ensure that every physician in Canada receives sufficient clinical training in STDs. Collaborative and cooperative efforts by federal, provincial and local governments, professional societies, licensing bodies, medical schools, residency programs, STD clinical directors and provincial and territorial directors of STD control, should be encouraged.http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/1992/419108
spellingShingle Jo-Anne A Doherty
A Gordon Jessamine
STD Training in Canadian Medical Schools
Canadian Journal of Infectious Diseases
title STD Training in Canadian Medical Schools
title_full STD Training in Canadian Medical Schools
title_fullStr STD Training in Canadian Medical Schools
title_full_unstemmed STD Training in Canadian Medical Schools
title_short STD Training in Canadian Medical Schools
title_sort std training in canadian medical schools
url http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/1992/419108
work_keys_str_mv AT joanneadoherty stdtrainingincanadianmedicalschools
AT agordonjessamine stdtrainingincanadianmedicalschools