Evaluation of the Bond Strength of Self-Etching Adhesive Systems Containing HEMA and 10-MDP Monomers: Bond Strength of Adhesives Containing HEMA and 10-MDP

The aim of this in vitro study was to assess the bond strength of self-etching adhesives containing HEMA and 10-MDP monomers. Twenty-four bovine teeth were divided into three groups. Two cylinders of composite resin were made in each tooth (n = 16): G1-Prime and Bond Universal (control); G2-OptiBond...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Roberta Pimentel de Oliveira, Brennda Lucy de Paula, Mara Eliane Ribeiro, Eliane Alves, Hilton Túlio Costi, Cecy Silva
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Wiley 2022-01-01
Series:International Journal of Dentistry
Online Access:http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2022/5756649
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
_version_ 1832562039716839424
author Roberta Pimentel de Oliveira
Brennda Lucy de Paula
Mara Eliane Ribeiro
Eliane Alves
Hilton Túlio Costi
Cecy Silva
author_facet Roberta Pimentel de Oliveira
Brennda Lucy de Paula
Mara Eliane Ribeiro
Eliane Alves
Hilton Túlio Costi
Cecy Silva
author_sort Roberta Pimentel de Oliveira
collection DOAJ
description The aim of this in vitro study was to assess the bond strength of self-etching adhesives containing HEMA and 10-MDP monomers. Twenty-four bovine teeth were divided into three groups. Two cylinders of composite resin were made in each tooth (n = 16): G1-Prime and Bond Universal (control); G2-OptiBond All-in-One (HEMA); and G3-Clearfil SE (10-MDP and HEMA). After 24-hour storage in distilled water, the specimens were fixed to a universal testing machine (Kratos Equipamentos Ltda.) for the microshear test at a speed of 0.5 mm/min. A qualitative analysis of the fracture pattern was also performed using scanning electron microscopy (500× magnification). The normality of sample data distribution was determined using the Shapiro–Wilk test. The results were assessed using the Kruskal–Wallis test, and α level of 5% was used for the analysis. The results indicated a statistical difference (p>0.05) between G3 (15.6080 MPa) and G2 (11.2180 MPa). No statistical difference was observed when G1 (14,6325 MPa) was compared with the other two groups. It was also observed that a mixed fracture pattern was predominant in all groups. The self-etching adhesive containing HEMA and 10-MDP monomers showed to be promising in increasing the bond strength between the dental substrate and the composite resin, whereas the adhesive containing only HEMA exhibited lower bond strength to dentin.
format Article
id doaj-art-342c8173205e4f278a4ea7226ba09d30
institution Kabale University
issn 1687-8736
language English
publishDate 2022-01-01
publisher Wiley
record_format Article
series International Journal of Dentistry
spelling doaj-art-342c8173205e4f278a4ea7226ba09d302025-02-03T01:23:36ZengWileyInternational Journal of Dentistry1687-87362022-01-01202210.1155/2022/5756649Evaluation of the Bond Strength of Self-Etching Adhesive Systems Containing HEMA and 10-MDP Monomers: Bond Strength of Adhesives Containing HEMA and 10-MDPRoberta Pimentel de Oliveira0Brennda Lucy de Paula1Mara Eliane Ribeiro2Eliane Alves3Hilton Túlio Costi4Cecy Silva5School of DentistrySchool of DentistrySchool of DentistrySchool of DentistryInstitutional Scanning Electron Microscopy LaboratorySchool of DentistryThe aim of this in vitro study was to assess the bond strength of self-etching adhesives containing HEMA and 10-MDP monomers. Twenty-four bovine teeth were divided into three groups. Two cylinders of composite resin were made in each tooth (n = 16): G1-Prime and Bond Universal (control); G2-OptiBond All-in-One (HEMA); and G3-Clearfil SE (10-MDP and HEMA). After 24-hour storage in distilled water, the specimens were fixed to a universal testing machine (Kratos Equipamentos Ltda.) for the microshear test at a speed of 0.5 mm/min. A qualitative analysis of the fracture pattern was also performed using scanning electron microscopy (500× magnification). The normality of sample data distribution was determined using the Shapiro–Wilk test. The results were assessed using the Kruskal–Wallis test, and α level of 5% was used for the analysis. The results indicated a statistical difference (p>0.05) between G3 (15.6080 MPa) and G2 (11.2180 MPa). No statistical difference was observed when G1 (14,6325 MPa) was compared with the other two groups. It was also observed that a mixed fracture pattern was predominant in all groups. The self-etching adhesive containing HEMA and 10-MDP monomers showed to be promising in increasing the bond strength between the dental substrate and the composite resin, whereas the adhesive containing only HEMA exhibited lower bond strength to dentin.http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2022/5756649
spellingShingle Roberta Pimentel de Oliveira
Brennda Lucy de Paula
Mara Eliane Ribeiro
Eliane Alves
Hilton Túlio Costi
Cecy Silva
Evaluation of the Bond Strength of Self-Etching Adhesive Systems Containing HEMA and 10-MDP Monomers: Bond Strength of Adhesives Containing HEMA and 10-MDP
International Journal of Dentistry
title Evaluation of the Bond Strength of Self-Etching Adhesive Systems Containing HEMA and 10-MDP Monomers: Bond Strength of Adhesives Containing HEMA and 10-MDP
title_full Evaluation of the Bond Strength of Self-Etching Adhesive Systems Containing HEMA and 10-MDP Monomers: Bond Strength of Adhesives Containing HEMA and 10-MDP
title_fullStr Evaluation of the Bond Strength of Self-Etching Adhesive Systems Containing HEMA and 10-MDP Monomers: Bond Strength of Adhesives Containing HEMA and 10-MDP
title_full_unstemmed Evaluation of the Bond Strength of Self-Etching Adhesive Systems Containing HEMA and 10-MDP Monomers: Bond Strength of Adhesives Containing HEMA and 10-MDP
title_short Evaluation of the Bond Strength of Self-Etching Adhesive Systems Containing HEMA and 10-MDP Monomers: Bond Strength of Adhesives Containing HEMA and 10-MDP
title_sort evaluation of the bond strength of self etching adhesive systems containing hema and 10 mdp monomers bond strength of adhesives containing hema and 10 mdp
url http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2022/5756649
work_keys_str_mv AT robertapimenteldeoliveira evaluationofthebondstrengthofselfetchingadhesivesystemscontaininghemaand10mdpmonomersbondstrengthofadhesivescontaininghemaand10mdp
AT brenndalucydepaula evaluationofthebondstrengthofselfetchingadhesivesystemscontaininghemaand10mdpmonomersbondstrengthofadhesivescontaininghemaand10mdp
AT maraelianeribeiro evaluationofthebondstrengthofselfetchingadhesivesystemscontaininghemaand10mdpmonomersbondstrengthofadhesivescontaininghemaand10mdp
AT elianealves evaluationofthebondstrengthofselfetchingadhesivesystemscontaininghemaand10mdpmonomersbondstrengthofadhesivescontaininghemaand10mdp
AT hiltontuliocosti evaluationofthebondstrengthofselfetchingadhesivesystemscontaininghemaand10mdpmonomersbondstrengthofadhesivescontaininghemaand10mdp
AT cecysilva evaluationofthebondstrengthofselfetchingadhesivesystemscontaininghemaand10mdpmonomersbondstrengthofadhesivescontaininghemaand10mdp