Economic analysis of hemodialysis and urgent-start peritoneal dialysis therapies

Abstract Introduction: Unplanned initiation of renal replacement therapy (RRT) in chronic kidney disease (CKD) patients is a common situation worldwide. In this scenario, peritoneal dialysis (PD) has emerged as a therapeutic option compared to hemodialysis (HD). In planned RRT, the costs of PD are...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Alexandre Minetto Brabo, Dayana Bitencourt Dias, Everton Nunes da Silva, Daniela Ponce
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Sociedade Brasileira de Nefrologia 2025-01-01
Series:Brazilian Journal of Nephrology
Subjects:
Online Access:http://www.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0101-28002025000100305&lng=en&tlng=en
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
_version_ 1832592558911389696
author Alexandre Minetto Brabo
Dayana Bitencourt Dias
Everton Nunes da Silva
Daniela Ponce
author_facet Alexandre Minetto Brabo
Dayana Bitencourt Dias
Everton Nunes da Silva
Daniela Ponce
author_sort Alexandre Minetto Brabo
collection DOAJ
description Abstract Introduction: Unplanned initiation of renal replacement therapy (RRT) in chronic kidney disease (CKD) patients is a common situation worldwide. In this scenario, peritoneal dialysis (PD) has emerged as a therapeutic option compared to hemodialysis (HD). In planned RRT, the costs of PD are lower than those of HD; however, the literature lacks such analyses when initiation is urgent. Objective: To clinically and economically evaluate, from the perspective of the Unified Health System (SUS, Sistema Único de Saúde), the strategy of initiating unplanned RRT using HD or PD in patients during their first year of therapy. Methodology: Quasi-experimental study with cost-effectiveness analysis based on primary data from incident patients on RRT, over a twelve-month follow-up period, using the intention-to-treat approach. Data collection occurred prospectively, directly from medical records, computing data on the use of dialysis therapy, high-cost medications, procedures in dialysis accesses and recorded events. Costs were estimated using the amounts reimbursed by the SUS. In the economic analysis, the application of the bootstrap method and the construction of graphical representations were proposed. Results: At the end of one year, there were no differences between costs and effectiveness when initiating unplanned RRT using either PD or HD. Conclusion: Starting RRT with PD is a similar option to starting with HD in patients requiring unplanned methods. The minimal initial investment required to establish PD slots makes it a strong option as a public health policy for expanding RRT in developing countries.
format Article
id doaj-art-34224396b4db4e779cc3f394e0d40e05
institution Kabale University
issn 2175-8239
language English
publishDate 2025-01-01
publisher Sociedade Brasileira de Nefrologia
record_format Article
series Brazilian Journal of Nephrology
spelling doaj-art-34224396b4db4e779cc3f394e0d40e052025-01-21T07:35:04ZengSociedade Brasileira de NefrologiaBrazilian Journal of Nephrology2175-82392025-01-0147110.1590/2175-8239-jbn-2024-0051enEconomic analysis of hemodialysis and urgent-start peritoneal dialysis therapiesAlexandre Minetto Brabohttps://orcid.org/0000-0001-7139-0067Dayana Bitencourt Diashttps://orcid.org/0000-0002-8687-4037Everton Nunes da Silvahttps://orcid.org/0000-0001-8747-4185Daniela Poncehttps://orcid.org/0000-0002-6178-6938Abstract Introduction: Unplanned initiation of renal replacement therapy (RRT) in chronic kidney disease (CKD) patients is a common situation worldwide. In this scenario, peritoneal dialysis (PD) has emerged as a therapeutic option compared to hemodialysis (HD). In planned RRT, the costs of PD are lower than those of HD; however, the literature lacks such analyses when initiation is urgent. Objective: To clinically and economically evaluate, from the perspective of the Unified Health System (SUS, Sistema Único de Saúde), the strategy of initiating unplanned RRT using HD or PD in patients during their first year of therapy. Methodology: Quasi-experimental study with cost-effectiveness analysis based on primary data from incident patients on RRT, over a twelve-month follow-up period, using the intention-to-treat approach. Data collection occurred prospectively, directly from medical records, computing data on the use of dialysis therapy, high-cost medications, procedures in dialysis accesses and recorded events. Costs were estimated using the amounts reimbursed by the SUS. In the economic analysis, the application of the bootstrap method and the construction of graphical representations were proposed. Results: At the end of one year, there were no differences between costs and effectiveness when initiating unplanned RRT using either PD or HD. Conclusion: Starting RRT with PD is a similar option to starting with HD in patients requiring unplanned methods. The minimal initial investment required to establish PD slots makes it a strong option as a public health policy for expanding RRT in developing countries.http://www.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0101-28002025000100305&lng=en&tlng=enPeritoneal DialysisHemodialysisHealth Economic EvaluationCost-Effectiveness EvaluationCost-Efficiency AnalysisHealth PolicyEvidence-Informed Policy
spellingShingle Alexandre Minetto Brabo
Dayana Bitencourt Dias
Everton Nunes da Silva
Daniela Ponce
Economic analysis of hemodialysis and urgent-start peritoneal dialysis therapies
Brazilian Journal of Nephrology
Peritoneal Dialysis
Hemodialysis
Health Economic Evaluation
Cost-Effectiveness Evaluation
Cost-Efficiency Analysis
Health Policy
Evidence-Informed Policy
title Economic analysis of hemodialysis and urgent-start peritoneal dialysis therapies
title_full Economic analysis of hemodialysis and urgent-start peritoneal dialysis therapies
title_fullStr Economic analysis of hemodialysis and urgent-start peritoneal dialysis therapies
title_full_unstemmed Economic analysis of hemodialysis and urgent-start peritoneal dialysis therapies
title_short Economic analysis of hemodialysis and urgent-start peritoneal dialysis therapies
title_sort economic analysis of hemodialysis and urgent start peritoneal dialysis therapies
topic Peritoneal Dialysis
Hemodialysis
Health Economic Evaluation
Cost-Effectiveness Evaluation
Cost-Efficiency Analysis
Health Policy
Evidence-Informed Policy
url http://www.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0101-28002025000100305&lng=en&tlng=en
work_keys_str_mv AT alexandreminettobrabo economicanalysisofhemodialysisandurgentstartperitonealdialysistherapies
AT dayanabitencourtdias economicanalysisofhemodialysisandurgentstartperitonealdialysistherapies
AT evertonnunesdasilva economicanalysisofhemodialysisandurgentstartperitonealdialysistherapies
AT danielaponce economicanalysisofhemodialysisandurgentstartperitonealdialysistherapies