Evidence-Based Education: Critical Analysis of Current Discussions
The article analyzes the current discussions on how to define evidence and implement evidence-based practice in education. Despite their frequent use, the terms “evidence-based practice”, “evidence-based education” etc. remain something like “empty signs” the meaning of which still needs to be defin...
Saved in:
| Main Authors: | , , |
|---|---|
| Format: | Article |
| Language: | English |
| Published: |
Moscow State University of Psychology and Education
2021-12-01
|
| Series: | Психолого-педагогические исследования |
| Subjects: | |
| Online Access: | https://psyjournals.ru/en/psyedu_ej/2021/n4/Buusygina.shtml |
| Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
| _version_ | 1849427060802453504 |
|---|---|
| author | Busygina N.P. Podushkina T.G. Stanilevsky V.V. |
| author_facet | Busygina N.P. Podushkina T.G. Stanilevsky V.V. |
| author_sort | Busygina N.P. |
| collection | DOAJ |
| description | The article analyzes the current discussions on how to define evidence and implement evidence-based practice in education. Despite their frequent use, the terms “evidence-based practice”, “evidence-based education” etc. remain something like “empty signs” the meaning of which still needs to be defined. The authors highlight several discussion topics regarding research for evidence-based practice and evidence-based process: hierarchical versus pluralistic conception of evidence; theoretical reasoning as evidence; top-down evidence-based practice versus bottom-up evidence-informed practitioner judgment; conception of research use as linear process of uptake or dissemination versus as bidirectional process by which research and practice mutually inform each other. It is presumed that although historically evidence-based approach was associated with an appeal to science primarily as an institution of prescription, in its actual versions the relationship between science and practice is much more complex. |
| format | Article |
| id | doaj-art-3401afb21cde4637a6c8695d3f358836 |
| institution | Kabale University |
| issn | 2587-6139 |
| language | English |
| publishDate | 2021-12-01 |
| publisher | Moscow State University of Psychology and Education |
| record_format | Article |
| series | Психолого-педагогические исследования |
| spelling | doaj-art-3401afb21cde4637a6c8695d3f3588362025-08-20T03:29:09ZengMoscow State University of Psychology and EducationПсихолого-педагогические исследования2587-61392021-12-0113416217610.17759/psyedu.2021130410Evidence-Based Education: Critical Analysis of Current DiscussionsBusygina N.P.0https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2344-9543Podushkina T.G.1https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5966-8342Stanilevsky V.V.2https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8808-7387Moscow State University of Psychology an Education, Moscow, RussiaMoscow State University of Psychology & Education, Moscow, RussiaAmerican University, Washington, USAThe article analyzes the current discussions on how to define evidence and implement evidence-based practice in education. Despite their frequent use, the terms “evidence-based practice”, “evidence-based education” etc. remain something like “empty signs” the meaning of which still needs to be defined. The authors highlight several discussion topics regarding research for evidence-based practice and evidence-based process: hierarchical versus pluralistic conception of evidence; theoretical reasoning as evidence; top-down evidence-based practice versus bottom-up evidence-informed practitioner judgment; conception of research use as linear process of uptake or dissemination versus as bidirectional process by which research and practice mutually inform each other. It is presumed that although historically evidence-based approach was associated with an appeal to science primarily as an institution of prescription, in its actual versions the relationship between science and practice is much more complex.https://psyjournals.ru/en/psyedu_ej/2021/n4/Buusygina.shtmlevidence-based educationevidence-based practiceevidence-informed practiceresearch for evidence-based practiceconception of evidenceevidence-based processresearch use |
| spellingShingle | Busygina N.P. Podushkina T.G. Stanilevsky V.V. Evidence-Based Education: Critical Analysis of Current Discussions Психолого-педагогические исследования evidence-based education evidence-based practice evidence-informed practice research for evidence-based practice conception of evidence evidence-based process research use |
| title | Evidence-Based Education: Critical Analysis of Current Discussions |
| title_full | Evidence-Based Education: Critical Analysis of Current Discussions |
| title_fullStr | Evidence-Based Education: Critical Analysis of Current Discussions |
| title_full_unstemmed | Evidence-Based Education: Critical Analysis of Current Discussions |
| title_short | Evidence-Based Education: Critical Analysis of Current Discussions |
| title_sort | evidence based education critical analysis of current discussions |
| topic | evidence-based education evidence-based practice evidence-informed practice research for evidence-based practice conception of evidence evidence-based process research use |
| url | https://psyjournals.ru/en/psyedu_ej/2021/n4/Buusygina.shtml |
| work_keys_str_mv | AT busyginanp evidencebasededucationcriticalanalysisofcurrentdiscussions AT podushkinatg evidencebasededucationcriticalanalysisofcurrentdiscussions AT stanilevskyvv evidencebasededucationcriticalanalysisofcurrentdiscussions |