A Power Case Study for Monocrystalline and Polycrystalline Solar Panels in Bursa City, Turkey

It was intended to reveal the time dependent power generation under different loads for two different solar panels under the conditions of Bursa province in between August 19 and 25, 2014. The testing sets include solar panels, inverter, multimeter, accumulator, regulator, pyranometer, pyrheliometer...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Ayşegül Taşçıoğlu, Onur Taşkın, Ali Vardar
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Wiley 2016-01-01
Series:International Journal of Photoenergy
Online Access:http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2016/7324138
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
_version_ 1832563627600642048
author Ayşegül Taşçıoğlu
Onur Taşkın
Ali Vardar
author_facet Ayşegül Taşçıoğlu
Onur Taşkın
Ali Vardar
author_sort Ayşegül Taşçıoğlu
collection DOAJ
description It was intended to reveal the time dependent power generation under different loads for two different solar panels under the conditions of Bursa province in between August 19 and 25, 2014. The testing sets include solar panels, inverter, multimeter, accumulator, regulator, pyranometer, pyrheliometer, temperature sensor, and datalogger. The efficiency of monocrystalline and polycrystalline solar panels was calculated depending on the climatic data’s measurements. As the result of the study, the average performances of monocrystalline and polycrystalline panels are 42.06 and 39.80 Wh, respectively. It was seen that 87.14 W instantaneous power could be obtained from monocrystalline solar panel and that 80.17 W instantaneous power could be obtained from polycrystalline solar panel under maximum total radiation (1001.13 W/m2). Within this frame, it was determined that monocrystalline solar panel is able to operate more efficiently under the conditions of Bursa compared to polycrystalline solar panel. When the multivariate correlations coefficients were examined statistically, a significant relationship in positive direction was detected between total and direct radiation and ambient temperature on energy generation from monocrystalline and polycrystalline panel.
format Article
id doaj-art-3386c57e9820475e889202f8bf90bc79
institution Kabale University
issn 1110-662X
1687-529X
language English
publishDate 2016-01-01
publisher Wiley
record_format Article
series International Journal of Photoenergy
spelling doaj-art-3386c57e9820475e889202f8bf90bc792025-02-03T01:13:00ZengWileyInternational Journal of Photoenergy1110-662X1687-529X2016-01-01201610.1155/2016/73241387324138A Power Case Study for Monocrystalline and Polycrystalline Solar Panels in Bursa City, TurkeyAyşegül Taşçıoğlu0Onur Taşkın1Ali Vardar2Department of Biosystems Engineering, Faculty of Agriculture, Uludag University, 16059 Bursa, TurkeyDepartment of Biosystems Engineering, Faculty of Agriculture, Uludag University, 16059 Bursa, TurkeyDepartment of Biosystems Engineering, Faculty of Agriculture, Uludag University, 16059 Bursa, TurkeyIt was intended to reveal the time dependent power generation under different loads for two different solar panels under the conditions of Bursa province in between August 19 and 25, 2014. The testing sets include solar panels, inverter, multimeter, accumulator, regulator, pyranometer, pyrheliometer, temperature sensor, and datalogger. The efficiency of monocrystalline and polycrystalline solar panels was calculated depending on the climatic data’s measurements. As the result of the study, the average performances of monocrystalline and polycrystalline panels are 42.06 and 39.80 Wh, respectively. It was seen that 87.14 W instantaneous power could be obtained from monocrystalline solar panel and that 80.17 W instantaneous power could be obtained from polycrystalline solar panel under maximum total radiation (1001.13 W/m2). Within this frame, it was determined that monocrystalline solar panel is able to operate more efficiently under the conditions of Bursa compared to polycrystalline solar panel. When the multivariate correlations coefficients were examined statistically, a significant relationship in positive direction was detected between total and direct radiation and ambient temperature on energy generation from monocrystalline and polycrystalline panel.http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2016/7324138
spellingShingle Ayşegül Taşçıoğlu
Onur Taşkın
Ali Vardar
A Power Case Study for Monocrystalline and Polycrystalline Solar Panels in Bursa City, Turkey
International Journal of Photoenergy
title A Power Case Study for Monocrystalline and Polycrystalline Solar Panels in Bursa City, Turkey
title_full A Power Case Study for Monocrystalline and Polycrystalline Solar Panels in Bursa City, Turkey
title_fullStr A Power Case Study for Monocrystalline and Polycrystalline Solar Panels in Bursa City, Turkey
title_full_unstemmed A Power Case Study for Monocrystalline and Polycrystalline Solar Panels in Bursa City, Turkey
title_short A Power Case Study for Monocrystalline and Polycrystalline Solar Panels in Bursa City, Turkey
title_sort power case study for monocrystalline and polycrystalline solar panels in bursa city turkey
url http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2016/7324138
work_keys_str_mv AT aysegultascıoglu apowercasestudyformonocrystallineandpolycrystallinesolarpanelsinbursacityturkey
AT onurtaskın apowercasestudyformonocrystallineandpolycrystallinesolarpanelsinbursacityturkey
AT alivardar apowercasestudyformonocrystallineandpolycrystallinesolarpanelsinbursacityturkey
AT aysegultascıoglu powercasestudyformonocrystallineandpolycrystallinesolarpanelsinbursacityturkey
AT onurtaskın powercasestudyformonocrystallineandpolycrystallinesolarpanelsinbursacityturkey
AT alivardar powercasestudyformonocrystallineandpolycrystallinesolarpanelsinbursacityturkey