A Power Case Study for Monocrystalline and Polycrystalline Solar Panels in Bursa City, Turkey
It was intended to reveal the time dependent power generation under different loads for two different solar panels under the conditions of Bursa province in between August 19 and 25, 2014. The testing sets include solar panels, inverter, multimeter, accumulator, regulator, pyranometer, pyrheliometer...
Saved in:
Main Authors: | , , |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
Wiley
2016-01-01
|
Series: | International Journal of Photoenergy |
Online Access: | http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2016/7324138 |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
_version_ | 1832563627600642048 |
---|---|
author | Ayşegül Taşçıoğlu Onur Taşkın Ali Vardar |
author_facet | Ayşegül Taşçıoğlu Onur Taşkın Ali Vardar |
author_sort | Ayşegül Taşçıoğlu |
collection | DOAJ |
description | It was intended to reveal the time dependent power generation under different loads for two different solar panels under the conditions of Bursa province in between August 19 and 25, 2014. The testing sets include solar panels, inverter, multimeter, accumulator, regulator, pyranometer, pyrheliometer, temperature sensor, and datalogger. The efficiency of monocrystalline and polycrystalline solar panels was calculated depending on the climatic data’s measurements. As the result of the study, the average performances of monocrystalline and polycrystalline panels are 42.06 and 39.80 Wh, respectively. It was seen that 87.14 W instantaneous power could be obtained from monocrystalline solar panel and that 80.17 W instantaneous power could be obtained from polycrystalline solar panel under maximum total radiation (1001.13 W/m2). Within this frame, it was determined that monocrystalline solar panel is able to operate more efficiently under the conditions of Bursa compared to polycrystalline solar panel. When the multivariate correlations coefficients were examined statistically, a significant relationship in positive direction was detected between total and direct radiation and ambient temperature on energy generation from monocrystalline and polycrystalline panel. |
format | Article |
id | doaj-art-3386c57e9820475e889202f8bf90bc79 |
institution | Kabale University |
issn | 1110-662X 1687-529X |
language | English |
publishDate | 2016-01-01 |
publisher | Wiley |
record_format | Article |
series | International Journal of Photoenergy |
spelling | doaj-art-3386c57e9820475e889202f8bf90bc792025-02-03T01:13:00ZengWileyInternational Journal of Photoenergy1110-662X1687-529X2016-01-01201610.1155/2016/73241387324138A Power Case Study for Monocrystalline and Polycrystalline Solar Panels in Bursa City, TurkeyAyşegül Taşçıoğlu0Onur Taşkın1Ali Vardar2Department of Biosystems Engineering, Faculty of Agriculture, Uludag University, 16059 Bursa, TurkeyDepartment of Biosystems Engineering, Faculty of Agriculture, Uludag University, 16059 Bursa, TurkeyDepartment of Biosystems Engineering, Faculty of Agriculture, Uludag University, 16059 Bursa, TurkeyIt was intended to reveal the time dependent power generation under different loads for two different solar panels under the conditions of Bursa province in between August 19 and 25, 2014. The testing sets include solar panels, inverter, multimeter, accumulator, regulator, pyranometer, pyrheliometer, temperature sensor, and datalogger. The efficiency of monocrystalline and polycrystalline solar panels was calculated depending on the climatic data’s measurements. As the result of the study, the average performances of monocrystalline and polycrystalline panels are 42.06 and 39.80 Wh, respectively. It was seen that 87.14 W instantaneous power could be obtained from monocrystalline solar panel and that 80.17 W instantaneous power could be obtained from polycrystalline solar panel under maximum total radiation (1001.13 W/m2). Within this frame, it was determined that monocrystalline solar panel is able to operate more efficiently under the conditions of Bursa compared to polycrystalline solar panel. When the multivariate correlations coefficients were examined statistically, a significant relationship in positive direction was detected between total and direct radiation and ambient temperature on energy generation from monocrystalline and polycrystalline panel.http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2016/7324138 |
spellingShingle | Ayşegül Taşçıoğlu Onur Taşkın Ali Vardar A Power Case Study for Monocrystalline and Polycrystalline Solar Panels in Bursa City, Turkey International Journal of Photoenergy |
title | A Power Case Study for Monocrystalline and Polycrystalline Solar Panels in Bursa City, Turkey |
title_full | A Power Case Study for Monocrystalline and Polycrystalline Solar Panels in Bursa City, Turkey |
title_fullStr | A Power Case Study for Monocrystalline and Polycrystalline Solar Panels in Bursa City, Turkey |
title_full_unstemmed | A Power Case Study for Monocrystalline and Polycrystalline Solar Panels in Bursa City, Turkey |
title_short | A Power Case Study for Monocrystalline and Polycrystalline Solar Panels in Bursa City, Turkey |
title_sort | power case study for monocrystalline and polycrystalline solar panels in bursa city turkey |
url | http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2016/7324138 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT aysegultascıoglu apowercasestudyformonocrystallineandpolycrystallinesolarpanelsinbursacityturkey AT onurtaskın apowercasestudyformonocrystallineandpolycrystallinesolarpanelsinbursacityturkey AT alivardar apowercasestudyformonocrystallineandpolycrystallinesolarpanelsinbursacityturkey AT aysegultascıoglu powercasestudyformonocrystallineandpolycrystallinesolarpanelsinbursacityturkey AT onurtaskın powercasestudyformonocrystallineandpolycrystallinesolarpanelsinbursacityturkey AT alivardar powercasestudyformonocrystallineandpolycrystallinesolarpanelsinbursacityturkey |