On Dynamic Mesh Force Evaluation of Spiral Bevel Gears
The mesh model and mesh stiffness representation are the two main factors affecting the calculation method and the results of the dynamic mesh force. Comparative studies considering the two factors are performed to explore appropriate approaches to estimate the dynamic meshing load on each contactin...
Saved in:
| Main Authors: | , , , |
|---|---|
| Format: | Article |
| Language: | English |
| Published: |
Wiley
2019-01-01
|
| Series: | Shock and Vibration |
| Online Access: | http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2019/5614574 |
| Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
| _version_ | 1832562797305659392 |
|---|---|
| author | Xiaoyu Sun Yongqiang Zhao Ming Liu Yanping Liu |
| author_facet | Xiaoyu Sun Yongqiang Zhao Ming Liu Yanping Liu |
| author_sort | Xiaoyu Sun |
| collection | DOAJ |
| description | The mesh model and mesh stiffness representation are the two main factors affecting the calculation method and the results of the dynamic mesh force. Comparative studies considering the two factors are performed to explore appropriate approaches to estimate the dynamic meshing load on each contacting tooth flank of spiral bevel gears. First, a tooth pair mesh model is proposed to better describe the mesh characteristics of individual tooth pairs in contact. The mesh parameters including the mesh vector, transmission error, and mesh stiffness are compared with those of the extensively applied single-point mesh model of a gear pair. Dynamic results from the proposed model indicate that it can reveal a more realistic and pronounced dynamic behavior of each engaged tooth pair. Second, dynamic mesh force calculations from three different approaches are compared to further investigate the effect of mesh stiffness representations. One method uses the mesh stiffness estimated by the commonly used average slope approach, the second method applies the mesh stiffness evaluated by the local slope approach, and the third approach utilizes a quasistatically defined interpolation function indexed by mesh deflection and mesh position. |
| format | Article |
| id | doaj-art-337208bf16054cf3a52d87d372cbcfc4 |
| institution | Kabale University |
| issn | 1070-9622 1875-9203 |
| language | English |
| publishDate | 2019-01-01 |
| publisher | Wiley |
| record_format | Article |
| series | Shock and Vibration |
| spelling | doaj-art-337208bf16054cf3a52d87d372cbcfc42025-02-03T01:21:43ZengWileyShock and Vibration1070-96221875-92032019-01-01201910.1155/2019/56145745614574On Dynamic Mesh Force Evaluation of Spiral Bevel GearsXiaoyu Sun0Yongqiang Zhao1Ming Liu2Yanping Liu3School of Mechatronics Engineering, Harbin Institute of Technology, No. 92, Xidazhi Street, Nangang District, Harbin, Heilongjiang, ChinaSchool of Mechatronics Engineering, Harbin Institute of Technology, No. 92, Xidazhi Street, Nangang District, Harbin, Heilongjiang, ChinaSchool of Mechatronics Engineering, Harbin Institute of Technology, No. 92, Xidazhi Street, Nangang District, Harbin, Heilongjiang, ChinaSchool of Mechatronics Engineering, Harbin Institute of Technology, No. 92, Xidazhi Street, Nangang District, Harbin, Heilongjiang, ChinaThe mesh model and mesh stiffness representation are the two main factors affecting the calculation method and the results of the dynamic mesh force. Comparative studies considering the two factors are performed to explore appropriate approaches to estimate the dynamic meshing load on each contacting tooth flank of spiral bevel gears. First, a tooth pair mesh model is proposed to better describe the mesh characteristics of individual tooth pairs in contact. The mesh parameters including the mesh vector, transmission error, and mesh stiffness are compared with those of the extensively applied single-point mesh model of a gear pair. Dynamic results from the proposed model indicate that it can reveal a more realistic and pronounced dynamic behavior of each engaged tooth pair. Second, dynamic mesh force calculations from three different approaches are compared to further investigate the effect of mesh stiffness representations. One method uses the mesh stiffness estimated by the commonly used average slope approach, the second method applies the mesh stiffness evaluated by the local slope approach, and the third approach utilizes a quasistatically defined interpolation function indexed by mesh deflection and mesh position.http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2019/5614574 |
| spellingShingle | Xiaoyu Sun Yongqiang Zhao Ming Liu Yanping Liu On Dynamic Mesh Force Evaluation of Spiral Bevel Gears Shock and Vibration |
| title | On Dynamic Mesh Force Evaluation of Spiral Bevel Gears |
| title_full | On Dynamic Mesh Force Evaluation of Spiral Bevel Gears |
| title_fullStr | On Dynamic Mesh Force Evaluation of Spiral Bevel Gears |
| title_full_unstemmed | On Dynamic Mesh Force Evaluation of Spiral Bevel Gears |
| title_short | On Dynamic Mesh Force Evaluation of Spiral Bevel Gears |
| title_sort | on dynamic mesh force evaluation of spiral bevel gears |
| url | http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2019/5614574 |
| work_keys_str_mv | AT xiaoyusun ondynamicmeshforceevaluationofspiralbevelgears AT yongqiangzhao ondynamicmeshforceevaluationofspiralbevelgears AT mingliu ondynamicmeshforceevaluationofspiralbevelgears AT yanpingliu ondynamicmeshforceevaluationofspiralbevelgears |