Descriptively Adequate and Cognitively Plausible? Validating Distinctions between Types of Coherence Relations
A central issue in linguistics concerns the relationship between theories and evidence in data. We investigate this issue in the field of discourse coherence, and particularly the study of coherence relations such as causal and contrastive. Proposed inventories of coherence relations differ greatly...
Saved in:
Main Authors: | Merel C.J. Scholman, Vera Demberg, Ted J.M. Sanders |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
Presses universitaires de Caen
2022-09-01
|
Series: | Discours |
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | https://journals.openedition.org/discours/12075 |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
Similar Items
-
Multiple Signals of Coherence Relations
by: Debopam Das, et al.
Published: (2019-10-01) -
Les emplois corrélatifs de parfois, quelquefois et des fois
by: Anne-Marie Guiraud
Published: (2017-10-01) -
When Do We Leave Discourse Relations Underspecified? The Effect of Formality and Relation Type
by: Ludivine Crible, et al.
Published: (2020-11-01) -
Analyse systématique du modèle de Bhaduri et Marglin à prix flexibles
by: Florian Botte, et al.
Published: (2020-01-01) -
FDTB1, première étape du projet « French Discourse Treebank » : repérage des connecteurs de discours en corpus
by: Laurence Danlos, et al.
Published: (2015-12-01)