Informational ecosystems partially explain differences in socioenvironmental conceptual associations between U.S. American racial groups

Abstract Social groups represent a collective identity defined by a distinct consensus of concepts (e.g., ideas, values, and goals) whose structural relationship varies between groups. Here we set out to measure how a set of inter-concept semantic associations, comprising what we refer to as a conce...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Roberto Vargas, Timothy Verstynen
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Nature Portfolio 2025-01-01
Series:Communications Psychology
Online Access:https://doi.org/10.1038/s44271-025-00186-w
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
_version_ 1832585412486365184
author Roberto Vargas
Timothy Verstynen
author_facet Roberto Vargas
Timothy Verstynen
author_sort Roberto Vargas
collection DOAJ
description Abstract Social groups represent a collective identity defined by a distinct consensus of concepts (e.g., ideas, values, and goals) whose structural relationship varies between groups. Here we set out to measure how a set of inter-concept semantic associations, comprising what we refer to as a concept graph, covaries between established social groups, based on racial identity, and how this effect is mediated by information ecosystems, contextualized as news sources. Group differences among racial identity (278 Black and 294 white Americans) and informational ecosystems (Left- and Right- leaning news sources) are present in subjective judgments of how the meaning of concepts such as healthcare, police, and voting relate to each other. These racial group differences in concept graphs were partially mediated by the bias of news sources that individuals get their information from. This supports the idea of groups being defined by common conceptual semantic relationships that partially arise from shared information ecosystems.
format Article
id doaj-art-32bc5d7f0a1c4789ab013e2c31a287e6
institution Kabale University
issn 2731-9121
language English
publishDate 2025-01-01
publisher Nature Portfolio
record_format Article
series Communications Psychology
spelling doaj-art-32bc5d7f0a1c4789ab013e2c31a287e62025-01-26T12:51:03ZengNature PortfolioCommunications Psychology2731-91212025-01-01311910.1038/s44271-025-00186-wInformational ecosystems partially explain differences in socioenvironmental conceptual associations between U.S. American racial groupsRoberto Vargas0Timothy Verstynen1Department of Psychology, Carnegie Mellon UniversityDepartment of Psychology, Carnegie Mellon UniversityAbstract Social groups represent a collective identity defined by a distinct consensus of concepts (e.g., ideas, values, and goals) whose structural relationship varies between groups. Here we set out to measure how a set of inter-concept semantic associations, comprising what we refer to as a concept graph, covaries between established social groups, based on racial identity, and how this effect is mediated by information ecosystems, contextualized as news sources. Group differences among racial identity (278 Black and 294 white Americans) and informational ecosystems (Left- and Right- leaning news sources) are present in subjective judgments of how the meaning of concepts such as healthcare, police, and voting relate to each other. These racial group differences in concept graphs were partially mediated by the bias of news sources that individuals get their information from. This supports the idea of groups being defined by common conceptual semantic relationships that partially arise from shared information ecosystems.https://doi.org/10.1038/s44271-025-00186-w
spellingShingle Roberto Vargas
Timothy Verstynen
Informational ecosystems partially explain differences in socioenvironmental conceptual associations between U.S. American racial groups
Communications Psychology
title Informational ecosystems partially explain differences in socioenvironmental conceptual associations between U.S. American racial groups
title_full Informational ecosystems partially explain differences in socioenvironmental conceptual associations between U.S. American racial groups
title_fullStr Informational ecosystems partially explain differences in socioenvironmental conceptual associations between U.S. American racial groups
title_full_unstemmed Informational ecosystems partially explain differences in socioenvironmental conceptual associations between U.S. American racial groups
title_short Informational ecosystems partially explain differences in socioenvironmental conceptual associations between U.S. American racial groups
title_sort informational ecosystems partially explain differences in socioenvironmental conceptual associations between u s american racial groups
url https://doi.org/10.1038/s44271-025-00186-w
work_keys_str_mv AT robertovargas informationalecosystemspartiallyexplaindifferencesinsocioenvironmentalconceptualassociationsbetweenusamericanracialgroups
AT timothyverstynen informationalecosystemspartiallyexplaindifferencesinsocioenvironmentalconceptualassociationsbetweenusamericanracialgroups