Chest wall perforator flap reconstruction in breast conserving surgery: quality of life and limited complications in outpatient treatment

Abstract Background Breast conserving surgery (BCS) with partial breast reconstruction (PBR) results in less morbidity, better cosmetic outcomes, and improved patient satisfaction compared to mastectomy. Perforator flap reconstruction can attenuate defects prone to breast deformity after BCS. Usuall...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: L. J. van Zeelst, R. Straten, R. R. J. P. van Eekeren, D. J. P. van Uden, J. H. W. de Wilt, L. J. A. Strobbe
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: BMC 2025-01-01
Series:World Journal of Surgical Oncology
Subjects:
Online Access:https://doi.org/10.1186/s12957-024-03638-5
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
_version_ 1832585625307447296
author L. J. van Zeelst
R. Straten
R. R. J. P. van Eekeren
D. J. P. van Uden
J. H. W. de Wilt
L. J. A. Strobbe
author_facet L. J. van Zeelst
R. Straten
R. R. J. P. van Eekeren
D. J. P. van Uden
J. H. W. de Wilt
L. J. A. Strobbe
author_sort L. J. van Zeelst
collection DOAJ
description Abstract Background Breast conserving surgery (BCS) with partial breast reconstruction (PBR) results in less morbidity, better cosmetic outcomes, and improved patient satisfaction compared to mastectomy. Perforator flap reconstruction can attenuate defects prone to breast deformity after BCS. Usually, postoperative drains and inpatient admission are part of this treatment. The main objective of this study is to report on postoperative complications and patient satisfaction after drainless perforator flap reconstruction by a dedicated breast surgeon. Methods In a retrospective case series, 42 patients were included. All patients underwent BCS with drainless perforator flap reconstruction, planned and performed by a single breast surgeon. Outcomes were complication incidence and patient satisfaction reported in the Breast-Q Breast Conserving Therapy (BCT) module. Results In the study cohort, the median age was 59.5 (49.8–71.3) years. Tumour types were ductal carcinoma in situ (DCIS, four patients, 9.5%), invasive no special type (NST, 22 patients, 52.4%), invasive lobular (12 patients, 28.6%), and other invasive cancers (4 patients, 9.5%). Complication incidence was seven of 42 patients (16.7%), including hematoma, seroma, wound dehiscence, fat necrosis, and lymphedema, all Clavien Dindo grade 0–1, without readmission or reoperation. Reported Breast-Q scores (median of 17 months after surgery) were 87/100 for psychosocial well-being, 82/100 for breast satisfaction, and 71/100 for physical well-being. Outpatient treatment was successful in 38 patients (90.5%), and 13 patients (31.0%) had an unplanned visit to the outpatient clinic. Conclusion Drainless perforator flap reconstruction performed by the breast surgeon results in high patient satisfaction and limited complications, both in number and severity. The use of drains and hospital stays after perforator flap reconstruction must be discouraged.
format Article
id doaj-art-3297b7ae16514734aac3f6ff5c257d41
institution Kabale University
issn 1477-7819
language English
publishDate 2025-01-01
publisher BMC
record_format Article
series World Journal of Surgical Oncology
spelling doaj-art-3297b7ae16514734aac3f6ff5c257d412025-01-26T12:36:30ZengBMCWorld Journal of Surgical Oncology1477-78192025-01-012311710.1186/s12957-024-03638-5Chest wall perforator flap reconstruction in breast conserving surgery: quality of life and limited complications in outpatient treatmentL. J. van Zeelst0R. Straten1R. R. J. P. van Eekeren2D. J. P. van Uden3J. H. W. de Wilt4L. J. A. Strobbe5Canisius Wilhelmina ZiekenhuisCanisius Wilhelmina ZiekenhuisRijnstateCanisius Wilhelmina ZiekenhuisRadboud Universitair Medisch CentrumCanisius Wilhelmina ZiekenhuisAbstract Background Breast conserving surgery (BCS) with partial breast reconstruction (PBR) results in less morbidity, better cosmetic outcomes, and improved patient satisfaction compared to mastectomy. Perforator flap reconstruction can attenuate defects prone to breast deformity after BCS. Usually, postoperative drains and inpatient admission are part of this treatment. The main objective of this study is to report on postoperative complications and patient satisfaction after drainless perforator flap reconstruction by a dedicated breast surgeon. Methods In a retrospective case series, 42 patients were included. All patients underwent BCS with drainless perforator flap reconstruction, planned and performed by a single breast surgeon. Outcomes were complication incidence and patient satisfaction reported in the Breast-Q Breast Conserving Therapy (BCT) module. Results In the study cohort, the median age was 59.5 (49.8–71.3) years. Tumour types were ductal carcinoma in situ (DCIS, four patients, 9.5%), invasive no special type (NST, 22 patients, 52.4%), invasive lobular (12 patients, 28.6%), and other invasive cancers (4 patients, 9.5%). Complication incidence was seven of 42 patients (16.7%), including hematoma, seroma, wound dehiscence, fat necrosis, and lymphedema, all Clavien Dindo grade 0–1, without readmission or reoperation. Reported Breast-Q scores (median of 17 months after surgery) were 87/100 for psychosocial well-being, 82/100 for breast satisfaction, and 71/100 for physical well-being. Outpatient treatment was successful in 38 patients (90.5%), and 13 patients (31.0%) had an unplanned visit to the outpatient clinic. Conclusion Drainless perforator flap reconstruction performed by the breast surgeon results in high patient satisfaction and limited complications, both in number and severity. The use of drains and hospital stays after perforator flap reconstruction must be discouraged.https://doi.org/10.1186/s12957-024-03638-5Breast conserving surgeryPartial breast reconstructionChest wall perforator flapsCosmeticsQuality of lifeOutpatient treatment
spellingShingle L. J. van Zeelst
R. Straten
R. R. J. P. van Eekeren
D. J. P. van Uden
J. H. W. de Wilt
L. J. A. Strobbe
Chest wall perforator flap reconstruction in breast conserving surgery: quality of life and limited complications in outpatient treatment
World Journal of Surgical Oncology
Breast conserving surgery
Partial breast reconstruction
Chest wall perforator flaps
Cosmetics
Quality of life
Outpatient treatment
title Chest wall perforator flap reconstruction in breast conserving surgery: quality of life and limited complications in outpatient treatment
title_full Chest wall perforator flap reconstruction in breast conserving surgery: quality of life and limited complications in outpatient treatment
title_fullStr Chest wall perforator flap reconstruction in breast conserving surgery: quality of life and limited complications in outpatient treatment
title_full_unstemmed Chest wall perforator flap reconstruction in breast conserving surgery: quality of life and limited complications in outpatient treatment
title_short Chest wall perforator flap reconstruction in breast conserving surgery: quality of life and limited complications in outpatient treatment
title_sort chest wall perforator flap reconstruction in breast conserving surgery quality of life and limited complications in outpatient treatment
topic Breast conserving surgery
Partial breast reconstruction
Chest wall perforator flaps
Cosmetics
Quality of life
Outpatient treatment
url https://doi.org/10.1186/s12957-024-03638-5
work_keys_str_mv AT ljvanzeelst chestwallperforatorflapreconstructioninbreastconservingsurgeryqualityoflifeandlimitedcomplicationsinoutpatienttreatment
AT rstraten chestwallperforatorflapreconstructioninbreastconservingsurgeryqualityoflifeandlimitedcomplicationsinoutpatienttreatment
AT rrjpvaneekeren chestwallperforatorflapreconstructioninbreastconservingsurgeryqualityoflifeandlimitedcomplicationsinoutpatienttreatment
AT djpvanuden chestwallperforatorflapreconstructioninbreastconservingsurgeryqualityoflifeandlimitedcomplicationsinoutpatienttreatment
AT jhwdewilt chestwallperforatorflapreconstructioninbreastconservingsurgeryqualityoflifeandlimitedcomplicationsinoutpatienttreatment
AT ljastrobbe chestwallperforatorflapreconstructioninbreastconservingsurgeryqualityoflifeandlimitedcomplicationsinoutpatienttreatment