The Doctrine of Double Effect: An Aid in Decision-Making

Human society of the modern world, which is greatly affected by technological and economic advancements, has to address moral problems with a new urgency. In many instances, the decision does not bring only positive effects. Such cases can be found in applied ethics: bio-medical ethics, business eth...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Pavol Dancák
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Uniwersytet Kardynała Stefana Wyszyńskiego w Warszawie 2020-09-01
Series:Studia Ecologiae et Bioethicae
Subjects:
Online Access:https://czasopisma.uksw.edu.pl/index.php/seb/article/view/7121
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
_version_ 1832573468179169280
author Pavol Dancák
author_facet Pavol Dancák
author_sort Pavol Dancák
collection DOAJ
description Human society of the modern world, which is greatly affected by technological and economic advancements, has to address moral problems with a new urgency. In many instances, the decision does not bring only positive effects. Such cases can be found in applied ethics: bio-medical ethics, business ethics, and legal ethics, but also in other areas of human activity, too, most recently,  in debates, concerning the use of autonomous vehicles or autonomous machines in general. This paper aims to describe and explain the principle of ‘double effect’, when solving complicated and, from the perspective of morality, profoundly dilemmatic situations. The principle of double effect was gradually developed as a means of seeking the right moral decisions. It has a firm and respected position within Catholic medical ethics, but also in secular legislation. The paper presents current thought experiments, which clarify moral decision-making in dilemmatic situations. What seems to be a shortcoming here, is that ethical thought experiments are far too abstract. On the one hand, they refine our knowledge, but on the other hand, they are very partial. The  evolution of medical imaging methods, has enabled us to take a closer look at the relationship between the deontological and utilitarian approaches to making moral judgments, but it does not relieve us of our responsibility for the decisions that we have made. The positive side of the principle of double effect, is that it protects us from the slippery slope of utilitarian consequentialism, where the admission of a lesser evil, is only a step away from committing evil in the name of the greater good.
format Article
id doaj-art-3223b14b9db842188fac0493823b3a18
institution Kabale University
issn 1733-1218
language English
publishDate 2020-09-01
publisher Uniwersytet Kardynała Stefana Wyszyńskiego w Warszawie
record_format Article
series Studia Ecologiae et Bioethicae
spelling doaj-art-3223b14b9db842188fac0493823b3a182025-02-02T04:02:18ZengUniwersytet Kardynała Stefana Wyszyńskiego w WarszawieStudia Ecologiae et Bioethicae1733-12182020-09-0118310.21697/seb.2020.18.3.03The Doctrine of Double Effect: An Aid in Decision-MakingPavol Dancák0Department of Philosophy and Religion, University of Presov,Human society of the modern world, which is greatly affected by technological and economic advancements, has to address moral problems with a new urgency. In many instances, the decision does not bring only positive effects. Such cases can be found in applied ethics: bio-medical ethics, business ethics, and legal ethics, but also in other areas of human activity, too, most recently,  in debates, concerning the use of autonomous vehicles or autonomous machines in general. This paper aims to describe and explain the principle of ‘double effect’, when solving complicated and, from the perspective of morality, profoundly dilemmatic situations. The principle of double effect was gradually developed as a means of seeking the right moral decisions. It has a firm and respected position within Catholic medical ethics, but also in secular legislation. The paper presents current thought experiments, which clarify moral decision-making in dilemmatic situations. What seems to be a shortcoming here, is that ethical thought experiments are far too abstract. On the one hand, they refine our knowledge, but on the other hand, they are very partial. The  evolution of medical imaging methods, has enabled us to take a closer look at the relationship between the deontological and utilitarian approaches to making moral judgments, but it does not relieve us of our responsibility for the decisions that we have made. The positive side of the principle of double effect, is that it protects us from the slippery slope of utilitarian consequentialism, where the admission of a lesser evil, is only a step away from committing evil in the name of the greater good.https://czasopisma.uksw.edu.pl/index.php/seb/article/view/7121moral dilemmasmedical ethicsprinciple of double effectutilitarian consequentialism
spellingShingle Pavol Dancák
The Doctrine of Double Effect: An Aid in Decision-Making
Studia Ecologiae et Bioethicae
moral dilemmas
medical ethics
principle of double effect
utilitarian consequentialism
title The Doctrine of Double Effect: An Aid in Decision-Making
title_full The Doctrine of Double Effect: An Aid in Decision-Making
title_fullStr The Doctrine of Double Effect: An Aid in Decision-Making
title_full_unstemmed The Doctrine of Double Effect: An Aid in Decision-Making
title_short The Doctrine of Double Effect: An Aid in Decision-Making
title_sort doctrine of double effect an aid in decision making
topic moral dilemmas
medical ethics
principle of double effect
utilitarian consequentialism
url https://czasopisma.uksw.edu.pl/index.php/seb/article/view/7121
work_keys_str_mv AT pavoldancak thedoctrineofdoubleeffectanaidindecisionmaking
AT pavoldancak doctrineofdoubleeffectanaidindecisionmaking