NASS VE TARİH

It can be rightly said that orientalism’ method of research on Islam has also been the method of Islamists in their relations to basic Islamic texts as a parallel situation of backwardness of Muslims in the field of science. This method, in fact an anti-method, is based on each researcher’s drawing...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Şevket Kotan
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Çorum Çağrı Eğitim Vakfı 2008-11-01
Series:İslami İlimler Dergisi
Subjects:
Online Access:https://dergipark.org.tr/tr/download/article-file/4428161
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
_version_ 1832570882231369728
author Şevket Kotan
author_facet Şevket Kotan
author_sort Şevket Kotan
collection DOAJ
description It can be rightly said that orientalism’ method of research on Islam has also been the method of Islamists in their relations to basic Islamic texts as a parallel situation of backwardness of Muslims in the field of science. This method, in fact an anti-method, is based on each researcher’s drawing a conclusion by reasoning on particular evidences, regardless the question if he/she is able to have a sufficient scientific background. How much paradoxical it may seem, this new method, finally, has been the most common method of every modern Islamist movements ranging from the most challenging rationalist-textualist ones to historicist apologist ones
format Article
id doaj-art-314b0473fe1940338493b3f63a9eeedf
institution Kabale University
issn 1306-7044
language English
publishDate 2008-11-01
publisher Çorum Çağrı Eğitim Vakfı
record_format Article
series İslami İlimler Dergisi
spelling doaj-art-314b0473fe1940338493b3f63a9eeedf2025-02-02T13:46:15ZengÇorum Çağrı Eğitim Vakfıİslami İlimler Dergisi1306-70442008-11-0116205218167NASS VE TARİHŞevket KotanIt can be rightly said that orientalism’ method of research on Islam has also been the method of Islamists in their relations to basic Islamic texts as a parallel situation of backwardness of Muslims in the field of science. This method, in fact an anti-method, is based on each researcher’s drawing a conclusion by reasoning on particular evidences, regardless the question if he/she is able to have a sufficient scientific background. How much paradoxical it may seem, this new method, finally, has been the most common method of every modern Islamist movements ranging from the most challenging rationalist-textualist ones to historicist apologist oneshttps://dergipark.org.tr/tr/download/article-file/4428161historymethodrationalist textualistreasoninghistorymethodrationalist textualistreasoning
spellingShingle Şevket Kotan
NASS VE TARİH
İslami İlimler Dergisi
history
method
rationalist textualist
reasoning
history
method
rationalist textualist
reasoning
title NASS VE TARİH
title_full NASS VE TARİH
title_fullStr NASS VE TARİH
title_full_unstemmed NASS VE TARİH
title_short NASS VE TARİH
title_sort nass ve tarih
topic history
method
rationalist textualist
reasoning
history
method
rationalist textualist
reasoning
url https://dergipark.org.tr/tr/download/article-file/4428161
work_keys_str_mv AT sevketkotan nassvetarih