A retrospective comparative study of endoscopic and microscopic Tympanoplasty

Abstract Background This study compares endoscopic and microscopic tympanoplasty for the treatment of chronic otitis media (COM) without cholesteatoma. Methods This retrospective study included 153 ears (139 patients) treated surgically (endoscopic or microscopic tympanoplasty) for COM in the absenc...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Ying-Chieh Hsu, Chin-Lung Kuo, Tzu-Chin Huang
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: SAGE Publishing 2018-07-01
Series:Journal of Otolaryngology - Head and Neck Surgery
Subjects:
Online Access:http://link.springer.com/article/10.1186/s40463-018-0289-4
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
_version_ 1832544186333659136
author Ying-Chieh Hsu
Chin-Lung Kuo
Tzu-Chin Huang
author_facet Ying-Chieh Hsu
Chin-Lung Kuo
Tzu-Chin Huang
author_sort Ying-Chieh Hsu
collection DOAJ
description Abstract Background This study compares endoscopic and microscopic tympanoplasty for the treatment of chronic otitis media (COM) without cholesteatoma. Methods This retrospective study included 153 ears (139 patients) treated surgically (endoscopic or microscopic tympanoplasty) for COM in the absence of cholesteatoma at our hospital between January 2008 and October 2015. The adoption of transcanal endoscopic ear surgery (TEES) or microscopic ear surgery (MES) was divided temporally (before and since 2014). Comparisons between these groups focused on the following: (I) surgical outcomes, including successful tympanic membrane healing and post-operative complications; (II) restoration of hearing; and (III) consumption of medical resources, including the duration of surgery and anesthesia. All patients had a follow-up period of at least 3 months after surgery. Results No statistically significant differences were observed between the two groups regarding surgical outcome or hearing restoration. TEES resulted in the successful healing of 96.2% of ear drums, whereas MES led to successful healing in 92% (p = 0.2826) of cases. The average hearing gains following surgery were 10.27 ± 6.4 and 12.43 ± 7.46 dB in TEES and MES, respectively. The consumption of medical resources in the TEES group was lower than that of the MES group (TEES versus MES) regarding the average operating time (87.8 ± 19.01 min (mins) versus 110.2 ± 17.0 (mins) (p <  0.0001)) and the mean duration of anesthesia ((for general anesthesia patients) (122.1 ± 21.25 mins versus 145.8 ± 16.88 mins) (p ≤  0.0001)). Conclusions The results indicate that TEES can achieve surgical outcomes and hearing restoration comparable to those of MES. In addition, TEES appears to be associated with shorter surgical and anesthesia time, which makes it an ideal alternative for the management of COM without cholesteatoma. Trial registration This study was approved by the Institutional Review Board of the Cathay General Hospital. (CGHIRB No: CGH-P105012).
format Article
id doaj-art-30f036f075de4d1c97bb45854a4c62ad
institution Kabale University
issn 1916-0216
language English
publishDate 2018-07-01
publisher SAGE Publishing
record_format Article
series Journal of Otolaryngology - Head and Neck Surgery
spelling doaj-art-30f036f075de4d1c97bb45854a4c62ad2025-02-03T10:51:14ZengSAGE PublishingJournal of Otolaryngology - Head and Neck Surgery1916-02162018-07-014711710.1186/s40463-018-0289-4A retrospective comparative study of endoscopic and microscopic TympanoplastyYing-Chieh Hsu0Chin-Lung Kuo1Tzu-Chin Huang2Department of Otorhinolaryngology, Cathay General HospitalDepartment of Otolaryngology, Taoyuan Armed Forces General HospitalDepartment of Otorhinolaryngology, Cathay General HospitalAbstract Background This study compares endoscopic and microscopic tympanoplasty for the treatment of chronic otitis media (COM) without cholesteatoma. Methods This retrospective study included 153 ears (139 patients) treated surgically (endoscopic or microscopic tympanoplasty) for COM in the absence of cholesteatoma at our hospital between January 2008 and October 2015. The adoption of transcanal endoscopic ear surgery (TEES) or microscopic ear surgery (MES) was divided temporally (before and since 2014). Comparisons between these groups focused on the following: (I) surgical outcomes, including successful tympanic membrane healing and post-operative complications; (II) restoration of hearing; and (III) consumption of medical resources, including the duration of surgery and anesthesia. All patients had a follow-up period of at least 3 months after surgery. Results No statistically significant differences were observed between the two groups regarding surgical outcome or hearing restoration. TEES resulted in the successful healing of 96.2% of ear drums, whereas MES led to successful healing in 92% (p = 0.2826) of cases. The average hearing gains following surgery were 10.27 ± 6.4 and 12.43 ± 7.46 dB in TEES and MES, respectively. The consumption of medical resources in the TEES group was lower than that of the MES group (TEES versus MES) regarding the average operating time (87.8 ± 19.01 min (mins) versus 110.2 ± 17.0 (mins) (p <  0.0001)) and the mean duration of anesthesia ((for general anesthesia patients) (122.1 ± 21.25 mins versus 145.8 ± 16.88 mins) (p ≤  0.0001)). Conclusions The results indicate that TEES can achieve surgical outcomes and hearing restoration comparable to those of MES. In addition, TEES appears to be associated with shorter surgical and anesthesia time, which makes it an ideal alternative for the management of COM without cholesteatoma. Trial registration This study was approved by the Institutional Review Board of the Cathay General Hospital. (CGHIRB No: CGH-P105012).http://link.springer.com/article/10.1186/s40463-018-0289-4Endoscopic ear surgeryMicroscopicTympanoplastyCost-efficacy
spellingShingle Ying-Chieh Hsu
Chin-Lung Kuo
Tzu-Chin Huang
A retrospective comparative study of endoscopic and microscopic Tympanoplasty
Journal of Otolaryngology - Head and Neck Surgery
Endoscopic ear surgery
Microscopic
Tympanoplasty
Cost-efficacy
title A retrospective comparative study of endoscopic and microscopic Tympanoplasty
title_full A retrospective comparative study of endoscopic and microscopic Tympanoplasty
title_fullStr A retrospective comparative study of endoscopic and microscopic Tympanoplasty
title_full_unstemmed A retrospective comparative study of endoscopic and microscopic Tympanoplasty
title_short A retrospective comparative study of endoscopic and microscopic Tympanoplasty
title_sort retrospective comparative study of endoscopic and microscopic tympanoplasty
topic Endoscopic ear surgery
Microscopic
Tympanoplasty
Cost-efficacy
url http://link.springer.com/article/10.1186/s40463-018-0289-4
work_keys_str_mv AT yingchiehhsu aretrospectivecomparativestudyofendoscopicandmicroscopictympanoplasty
AT chinlungkuo aretrospectivecomparativestudyofendoscopicandmicroscopictympanoplasty
AT tzuchinhuang aretrospectivecomparativestudyofendoscopicandmicroscopictympanoplasty
AT yingchiehhsu retrospectivecomparativestudyofendoscopicandmicroscopictympanoplasty
AT chinlungkuo retrospectivecomparativestudyofendoscopicandmicroscopictympanoplasty
AT tzuchinhuang retrospectivecomparativestudyofendoscopicandmicroscopictympanoplasty