Social inclusion programming for older adults living in age-friendly cities: a scoping review
Objectives Creating age-friendly cities (AFCs) is essential for supporting older adults’ well-being. The WHO’s 2007 guide outlines key features of AFCs, including social inclusion. Despite increasing numbers of AFC programmes, diverse experiences of ageing are often overlooked. This scoping review e...
Saved in:
| Main Authors: | , , , |
|---|---|
| Format: | Article |
| Language: | English |
| Published: |
BMJ Publishing Group
2025-01-01
|
| Series: | BMJ Open |
| Online Access: | https://bmjopen.bmj.com/content/15/1/e088439.full |
| Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
| _version_ | 1832575573038202880 |
|---|---|
| author | Josephine McMurray Madalena Pamela Liougas Adriana Fortino Kari Brozowski |
| author_facet | Josephine McMurray Madalena Pamela Liougas Adriana Fortino Kari Brozowski |
| author_sort | Josephine McMurray |
| collection | DOAJ |
| description | Objectives Creating age-friendly cities (AFCs) is essential for supporting older adults’ well-being. The WHO’s 2007 guide outlines key features of AFCs, including social inclusion. Despite increasing numbers of AFC programmes, diverse experiences of ageing are often overlooked. This scoping review explores innovative programmes implemented by AFCs to enhance social inclusion for older adults.Design A scoping review following the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses extension for Scoping Reviews guidelines.Data sources Systematic searches were conducted between December 2023 and January 2024 across relevant databases (Ovid Medline, OVID Embase, OVID PsycINFO, CINAHL, Web of Science, Cochrane Library and Scopus) and the grey literature.Eligibility criteria for selecting studies Selection criteria included English language publications describing evaluated age-friendly, social inclusion programmes for older adults.Data extraction and synthesis Data extraction followed Gonyea and Hudson’s (2015) framework assessing programmes on population, environment and/or sector inclusion levels. Inductive analysis identified and evaluated aspects of social inclusion.Results We identified 20 peer-reviewed publications and 18 grey literature sources. Most programmes (peer review, n=19, 95.0%; grey, n=18, 100.0%) addressed population inclusion, incorporated environment (peer review, n=10, 50.0%; grey, n=15, 83.3%) and/or sector inclusion (peer review, n=7, 35.0%; grey, n=15, 83.3%). Key outcomes included an improved sense of belonging, increased engagement with community resources and activities, enhanced digital literacy and connectivity, and a reduction in feelings of loneliness and isolation. A notable gap was the absence of studies focused on Indigenous populations.Conclusion We highlight that programmes addressing population, environment and sectoral inclusion may improve the well-being of older adults in urban settings. Our findings will inform AFC practices and policies by deepening our understanding of how social inclusion can be improved for older adults, including those from under-represented groups, ensuring an equitable approach to enhancing quality of life. |
| format | Article |
| id | doaj-art-3051e2114cd748eda360ea481f32d093 |
| institution | Kabale University |
| issn | 2044-6055 |
| language | English |
| publishDate | 2025-01-01 |
| publisher | BMJ Publishing Group |
| record_format | Article |
| series | BMJ Open |
| spelling | doaj-art-3051e2114cd748eda360ea481f32d0932025-01-31T20:20:10ZengBMJ Publishing GroupBMJ Open2044-60552025-01-0115110.1136/bmjopen-2024-088439Social inclusion programming for older adults living in age-friendly cities: a scoping reviewJosephine McMurray0Madalena Pamela Liougas1Adriana Fortino2Kari Brozowski35 Wilfrid Laurier University, Waterloo, Ontario, Canada1 University Health Network, Toronto, Ontario, Canada3 McMaster University, Hamilton, Ontario, Canada4 Department of Health Studies, Wilfrid Laurier University, Waterloo, Ontario, CanadaObjectives Creating age-friendly cities (AFCs) is essential for supporting older adults’ well-being. The WHO’s 2007 guide outlines key features of AFCs, including social inclusion. Despite increasing numbers of AFC programmes, diverse experiences of ageing are often overlooked. This scoping review explores innovative programmes implemented by AFCs to enhance social inclusion for older adults.Design A scoping review following the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses extension for Scoping Reviews guidelines.Data sources Systematic searches were conducted between December 2023 and January 2024 across relevant databases (Ovid Medline, OVID Embase, OVID PsycINFO, CINAHL, Web of Science, Cochrane Library and Scopus) and the grey literature.Eligibility criteria for selecting studies Selection criteria included English language publications describing evaluated age-friendly, social inclusion programmes for older adults.Data extraction and synthesis Data extraction followed Gonyea and Hudson’s (2015) framework assessing programmes on population, environment and/or sector inclusion levels. Inductive analysis identified and evaluated aspects of social inclusion.Results We identified 20 peer-reviewed publications and 18 grey literature sources. Most programmes (peer review, n=19, 95.0%; grey, n=18, 100.0%) addressed population inclusion, incorporated environment (peer review, n=10, 50.0%; grey, n=15, 83.3%) and/or sector inclusion (peer review, n=7, 35.0%; grey, n=15, 83.3%). Key outcomes included an improved sense of belonging, increased engagement with community resources and activities, enhanced digital literacy and connectivity, and a reduction in feelings of loneliness and isolation. A notable gap was the absence of studies focused on Indigenous populations.Conclusion We highlight that programmes addressing population, environment and sectoral inclusion may improve the well-being of older adults in urban settings. Our findings will inform AFC practices and policies by deepening our understanding of how social inclusion can be improved for older adults, including those from under-represented groups, ensuring an equitable approach to enhancing quality of life.https://bmjopen.bmj.com/content/15/1/e088439.full |
| spellingShingle | Josephine McMurray Madalena Pamela Liougas Adriana Fortino Kari Brozowski Social inclusion programming for older adults living in age-friendly cities: a scoping review BMJ Open |
| title | Social inclusion programming for older adults living in age-friendly cities: a scoping review |
| title_full | Social inclusion programming for older adults living in age-friendly cities: a scoping review |
| title_fullStr | Social inclusion programming for older adults living in age-friendly cities: a scoping review |
| title_full_unstemmed | Social inclusion programming for older adults living in age-friendly cities: a scoping review |
| title_short | Social inclusion programming for older adults living in age-friendly cities: a scoping review |
| title_sort | social inclusion programming for older adults living in age friendly cities a scoping review |
| url | https://bmjopen.bmj.com/content/15/1/e088439.full |
| work_keys_str_mv | AT josephinemcmurray socialinclusionprogrammingforolderadultslivinginagefriendlycitiesascopingreview AT madalenapamelaliougas socialinclusionprogrammingforolderadultslivinginagefriendlycitiesascopingreview AT adrianafortino socialinclusionprogrammingforolderadultslivinginagefriendlycitiesascopingreview AT karibrozowski socialinclusionprogrammingforolderadultslivinginagefriendlycitiesascopingreview |