Usefulness of the Hybrid RFR-FFR Approach: Results of a Prospective and Multicenter Analysis of Diagnostic Agreement between RFR and FFR—The RECOPA (REsting Full-Cycle Ratio Comparation versus Fractional Flow Reserve (A Prospective Validation)) Study
Background. The resting full‐cycle ratio (RFR) is a novel resting index which in contrast to the gold standard (fractional flow reserve (FFR)) does not require maximum hyperemia induction. The objectives of this study were to evaluate the agreement between RFR and FFR with the currently recommended...
Saved in:
Main Authors: | , , , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
Wiley
2021-01-01
|
Series: | Journal of Interventional Cardiology |
Online Access: | http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2021/5522707 |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
_version_ | 1832566119537311744 |
---|---|
author | Juan Casanova-Sandoval Diego Fernández-Rodríguez Imanol Otaegui Teresa Gil Jiménez Marcos Rodríguez-Esteban Kristian Rivera Francisco Torres-Saura Víctor Jiménez Díaz Raymundo Ocaranza-Sánchez Vicente Peral Disdier Guillermo Sánchez-Elvira Fernando Worner |
author_facet | Juan Casanova-Sandoval Diego Fernández-Rodríguez Imanol Otaegui Teresa Gil Jiménez Marcos Rodríguez-Esteban Kristian Rivera Francisco Torres-Saura Víctor Jiménez Díaz Raymundo Ocaranza-Sánchez Vicente Peral Disdier Guillermo Sánchez-Elvira Fernando Worner |
author_sort | Juan Casanova-Sandoval |
collection | DOAJ |
description | Background. The resting full‐cycle ratio (RFR) is a novel resting index which in contrast to the gold standard (fractional flow reserve (FFR)) does not require maximum hyperemia induction. The objectives of this study were to evaluate the agreement between RFR and FFR with the currently recommended thresholds and to design a hybrid RFR-FFR ischemia detection strategy, allowing a reduction of coronary vasodilator use. Materials and Methods. Patients subjected to invasive physiological study in 9 Spanish centers were prospectively recruited between April 2019 and March 2020. Sensitivity and specificity studies were made to assess diagnostic accuracy between the recommended levels of RFR ≤0.89 and FFR ≤0.80 (primary objective) and to determine the RFR “grey zone” in order to define a hybrid strategy with FFR affording 95% global agreement compared with FFR alone (secondary objective). Results. A total of 380 lesions were evaluated in 311 patients. Significant correlation was observed (R2 = 0.81; P<0.001) between the two techniques, with 79% agreement between RFR ≤ 0.89 and FFR ≤ 0.80 (positive predictive value, 68%, and negative predictive value, 80%). The hybrid RFR-FFR strategy, administering only adenosine in the “grey zone” (RFR: 0.86 to 0.92), exhibited an agreement of over 95% with FFR, with high predictive values (positive predictive value, 91%, and negative predictive value, 92%), reducing the need for vasodilators by 58%. Conclusions. Dichotomous agreement between RFR and FFR with the recommended thresholds is significant but limited. The adoption of a hybrid RFR-FFR strategy affords very high agreement, with minimization of vasodilator use. |
format | Article |
id | doaj-art-3044a789d60243e995cff9fe8de6a61d |
institution | Kabale University |
issn | 0896-4327 1540-8183 |
language | English |
publishDate | 2021-01-01 |
publisher | Wiley |
record_format | Article |
series | Journal of Interventional Cardiology |
spelling | doaj-art-3044a789d60243e995cff9fe8de6a61d2025-02-03T01:05:05ZengWileyJournal of Interventional Cardiology0896-43271540-81832021-01-01202110.1155/2021/55227075522707Usefulness of the Hybrid RFR-FFR Approach: Results of a Prospective and Multicenter Analysis of Diagnostic Agreement between RFR and FFR—The RECOPA (REsting Full-Cycle Ratio Comparation versus Fractional Flow Reserve (A Prospective Validation)) StudyJuan Casanova-Sandoval0Diego Fernández-Rodríguez1Imanol Otaegui2Teresa Gil Jiménez3Marcos Rodríguez-Esteban4Kristian Rivera5Francisco Torres-Saura6Víctor Jiménez Díaz7Raymundo Ocaranza-Sánchez8Vicente Peral Disdier9Guillermo Sánchez-Elvira10Fernando Worner11Hospital Universitari Arnau de Vilanova, Lleida, SpainHospital Universitari Arnau de Vilanova, Lleida, SpainHospital Universitari Vall d´Hebron, Barcelona, SpainHospital Universitario Clínico San Cecilio de Granada, Granada, SpainHospital Universitario Nuestra Señora de Candelaria, Tenerife, SpainHospital Universitari Arnau de Vilanova, Lleida, SpainHospital Universitario de Vinalopó, Elche, SpainHospital Universitario Alvaro Cunqueiro, Vigo, SpainHospital Universitario Lucus Augusti, Lugo, SpainHospital Son Espases, Palma de Mallorca, SpainComplejo Hospitalario de Navarra, Pamplona, SpainHospital Universitari Arnau de Vilanova, Lleida, SpainBackground. The resting full‐cycle ratio (RFR) is a novel resting index which in contrast to the gold standard (fractional flow reserve (FFR)) does not require maximum hyperemia induction. The objectives of this study were to evaluate the agreement between RFR and FFR with the currently recommended thresholds and to design a hybrid RFR-FFR ischemia detection strategy, allowing a reduction of coronary vasodilator use. Materials and Methods. Patients subjected to invasive physiological study in 9 Spanish centers were prospectively recruited between April 2019 and March 2020. Sensitivity and specificity studies were made to assess diagnostic accuracy between the recommended levels of RFR ≤0.89 and FFR ≤0.80 (primary objective) and to determine the RFR “grey zone” in order to define a hybrid strategy with FFR affording 95% global agreement compared with FFR alone (secondary objective). Results. A total of 380 lesions were evaluated in 311 patients. Significant correlation was observed (R2 = 0.81; P<0.001) between the two techniques, with 79% agreement between RFR ≤ 0.89 and FFR ≤ 0.80 (positive predictive value, 68%, and negative predictive value, 80%). The hybrid RFR-FFR strategy, administering only adenosine in the “grey zone” (RFR: 0.86 to 0.92), exhibited an agreement of over 95% with FFR, with high predictive values (positive predictive value, 91%, and negative predictive value, 92%), reducing the need for vasodilators by 58%. Conclusions. Dichotomous agreement between RFR and FFR with the recommended thresholds is significant but limited. The adoption of a hybrid RFR-FFR strategy affords very high agreement, with minimization of vasodilator use.http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2021/5522707 |
spellingShingle | Juan Casanova-Sandoval Diego Fernández-Rodríguez Imanol Otaegui Teresa Gil Jiménez Marcos Rodríguez-Esteban Kristian Rivera Francisco Torres-Saura Víctor Jiménez Díaz Raymundo Ocaranza-Sánchez Vicente Peral Disdier Guillermo Sánchez-Elvira Fernando Worner Usefulness of the Hybrid RFR-FFR Approach: Results of a Prospective and Multicenter Analysis of Diagnostic Agreement between RFR and FFR—The RECOPA (REsting Full-Cycle Ratio Comparation versus Fractional Flow Reserve (A Prospective Validation)) Study Journal of Interventional Cardiology |
title | Usefulness of the Hybrid RFR-FFR Approach: Results of a Prospective and Multicenter Analysis of Diagnostic Agreement between RFR and FFR—The RECOPA (REsting Full-Cycle Ratio Comparation versus Fractional Flow Reserve (A Prospective Validation)) Study |
title_full | Usefulness of the Hybrid RFR-FFR Approach: Results of a Prospective and Multicenter Analysis of Diagnostic Agreement between RFR and FFR—The RECOPA (REsting Full-Cycle Ratio Comparation versus Fractional Flow Reserve (A Prospective Validation)) Study |
title_fullStr | Usefulness of the Hybrid RFR-FFR Approach: Results of a Prospective and Multicenter Analysis of Diagnostic Agreement between RFR and FFR—The RECOPA (REsting Full-Cycle Ratio Comparation versus Fractional Flow Reserve (A Prospective Validation)) Study |
title_full_unstemmed | Usefulness of the Hybrid RFR-FFR Approach: Results of a Prospective and Multicenter Analysis of Diagnostic Agreement between RFR and FFR—The RECOPA (REsting Full-Cycle Ratio Comparation versus Fractional Flow Reserve (A Prospective Validation)) Study |
title_short | Usefulness of the Hybrid RFR-FFR Approach: Results of a Prospective and Multicenter Analysis of Diagnostic Agreement between RFR and FFR—The RECOPA (REsting Full-Cycle Ratio Comparation versus Fractional Flow Reserve (A Prospective Validation)) Study |
title_sort | usefulness of the hybrid rfr ffr approach results of a prospective and multicenter analysis of diagnostic agreement between rfr and ffr the recopa resting full cycle ratio comparation versus fractional flow reserve a prospective validation study |
url | http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2021/5522707 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT juancasanovasandoval usefulnessofthehybridrfrffrapproachresultsofaprospectiveandmulticenteranalysisofdiagnosticagreementbetweenrfrandffrtherecoparestingfullcycleratiocomparationversusfractionalflowreserveaprospectivevalidationstudy AT diegofernandezrodriguez usefulnessofthehybridrfrffrapproachresultsofaprospectiveandmulticenteranalysisofdiagnosticagreementbetweenrfrandffrtherecoparestingfullcycleratiocomparationversusfractionalflowreserveaprospectivevalidationstudy AT imanolotaegui usefulnessofthehybridrfrffrapproachresultsofaprospectiveandmulticenteranalysisofdiagnosticagreementbetweenrfrandffrtherecoparestingfullcycleratiocomparationversusfractionalflowreserveaprospectivevalidationstudy AT teresagiljimenez usefulnessofthehybridrfrffrapproachresultsofaprospectiveandmulticenteranalysisofdiagnosticagreementbetweenrfrandffrtherecoparestingfullcycleratiocomparationversusfractionalflowreserveaprospectivevalidationstudy AT marcosrodriguezesteban usefulnessofthehybridrfrffrapproachresultsofaprospectiveandmulticenteranalysisofdiagnosticagreementbetweenrfrandffrtherecoparestingfullcycleratiocomparationversusfractionalflowreserveaprospectivevalidationstudy AT kristianrivera usefulnessofthehybridrfrffrapproachresultsofaprospectiveandmulticenteranalysisofdiagnosticagreementbetweenrfrandffrtherecoparestingfullcycleratiocomparationversusfractionalflowreserveaprospectivevalidationstudy AT franciscotorressaura usefulnessofthehybridrfrffrapproachresultsofaprospectiveandmulticenteranalysisofdiagnosticagreementbetweenrfrandffrtherecoparestingfullcycleratiocomparationversusfractionalflowreserveaprospectivevalidationstudy AT victorjimenezdiaz usefulnessofthehybridrfrffrapproachresultsofaprospectiveandmulticenteranalysisofdiagnosticagreementbetweenrfrandffrtherecoparestingfullcycleratiocomparationversusfractionalflowreserveaprospectivevalidationstudy AT raymundoocaranzasanchez usefulnessofthehybridrfrffrapproachresultsofaprospectiveandmulticenteranalysisofdiagnosticagreementbetweenrfrandffrtherecoparestingfullcycleratiocomparationversusfractionalflowreserveaprospectivevalidationstudy AT vicenteperaldisdier usefulnessofthehybridrfrffrapproachresultsofaprospectiveandmulticenteranalysisofdiagnosticagreementbetweenrfrandffrtherecoparestingfullcycleratiocomparationversusfractionalflowreserveaprospectivevalidationstudy AT guillermosanchezelvira usefulnessofthehybridrfrffrapproachresultsofaprospectiveandmulticenteranalysisofdiagnosticagreementbetweenrfrandffrtherecoparestingfullcycleratiocomparationversusfractionalflowreserveaprospectivevalidationstudy AT fernandoworner usefulnessofthehybridrfrffrapproachresultsofaprospectiveandmulticenteranalysisofdiagnosticagreementbetweenrfrandffrtherecoparestingfullcycleratiocomparationversusfractionalflowreserveaprospectivevalidationstudy |