Usefulness of the Hybrid RFR-FFR Approach: Results of a Prospective and Multicenter Analysis of Diagnostic Agreement between RFR and FFR—The RECOPA (REsting Full-Cycle Ratio Comparation versus Fractional Flow Reserve (A Prospective Validation)) Study

Background. The resting full‐cycle ratio (RFR) is a novel resting index which in contrast to the gold standard (fractional flow reserve (FFR)) does not require maximum hyperemia induction. The objectives of this study were to evaluate the agreement between RFR and FFR with the currently recommended...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Juan Casanova-Sandoval, Diego Fernández-Rodríguez, Imanol Otaegui, Teresa Gil Jiménez, Marcos Rodríguez-Esteban, Kristian Rivera, Francisco Torres-Saura, Víctor Jiménez Díaz, Raymundo Ocaranza-Sánchez, Vicente Peral Disdier, Guillermo Sánchez-Elvira, Fernando Worner
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Wiley 2021-01-01
Series:Journal of Interventional Cardiology
Online Access:http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2021/5522707
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
_version_ 1832566119537311744
author Juan Casanova-Sandoval
Diego Fernández-Rodríguez
Imanol Otaegui
Teresa Gil Jiménez
Marcos Rodríguez-Esteban
Kristian Rivera
Francisco Torres-Saura
Víctor Jiménez Díaz
Raymundo Ocaranza-Sánchez
Vicente Peral Disdier
Guillermo Sánchez-Elvira
Fernando Worner
author_facet Juan Casanova-Sandoval
Diego Fernández-Rodríguez
Imanol Otaegui
Teresa Gil Jiménez
Marcos Rodríguez-Esteban
Kristian Rivera
Francisco Torres-Saura
Víctor Jiménez Díaz
Raymundo Ocaranza-Sánchez
Vicente Peral Disdier
Guillermo Sánchez-Elvira
Fernando Worner
author_sort Juan Casanova-Sandoval
collection DOAJ
description Background. The resting full‐cycle ratio (RFR) is a novel resting index which in contrast to the gold standard (fractional flow reserve (FFR)) does not require maximum hyperemia induction. The objectives of this study were to evaluate the agreement between RFR and FFR with the currently recommended thresholds and to design a hybrid RFR-FFR ischemia detection strategy, allowing a reduction of coronary vasodilator use. Materials and Methods. Patients subjected to invasive physiological study in 9 Spanish centers were prospectively recruited between April 2019 and March 2020. Sensitivity and specificity studies were made to assess diagnostic accuracy between the recommended levels of RFR ≤0.89 and FFR ≤0.80 (primary objective) and to determine the RFR “grey zone” in order to define a hybrid strategy with FFR affording 95% global agreement compared with FFR alone (secondary objective). Results. A total of 380 lesions were evaluated in 311 patients. Significant correlation was observed (R2 = 0.81; P<0.001) between the two techniques, with 79% agreement between RFR ≤ 0.89 and FFR ≤ 0.80 (positive predictive value, 68%, and negative predictive value, 80%). The hybrid RFR-FFR strategy, administering only adenosine in the “grey zone” (RFR: 0.86 to 0.92), exhibited an agreement of over 95% with FFR, with high predictive values (positive predictive value, 91%, and negative predictive value, 92%), reducing the need for vasodilators by 58%. Conclusions. Dichotomous agreement between RFR and FFR with the recommended thresholds is significant but limited. The adoption of a hybrid RFR-FFR strategy affords very high agreement, with minimization of vasodilator use.
format Article
id doaj-art-3044a789d60243e995cff9fe8de6a61d
institution Kabale University
issn 0896-4327
1540-8183
language English
publishDate 2021-01-01
publisher Wiley
record_format Article
series Journal of Interventional Cardiology
spelling doaj-art-3044a789d60243e995cff9fe8de6a61d2025-02-03T01:05:05ZengWileyJournal of Interventional Cardiology0896-43271540-81832021-01-01202110.1155/2021/55227075522707Usefulness of the Hybrid RFR-FFR Approach: Results of a Prospective and Multicenter Analysis of Diagnostic Agreement between RFR and FFR—The RECOPA (REsting Full-Cycle Ratio Comparation versus Fractional Flow Reserve (A Prospective Validation)) StudyJuan Casanova-Sandoval0Diego Fernández-Rodríguez1Imanol Otaegui2Teresa Gil Jiménez3Marcos Rodríguez-Esteban4Kristian Rivera5Francisco Torres-Saura6Víctor Jiménez Díaz7Raymundo Ocaranza-Sánchez8Vicente Peral Disdier9Guillermo Sánchez-Elvira10Fernando Worner11Hospital Universitari Arnau de Vilanova, Lleida, SpainHospital Universitari Arnau de Vilanova, Lleida, SpainHospital Universitari Vall d´Hebron, Barcelona, SpainHospital Universitario Clínico San Cecilio de Granada, Granada, SpainHospital Universitario Nuestra Señora de Candelaria, Tenerife, SpainHospital Universitari Arnau de Vilanova, Lleida, SpainHospital Universitario de Vinalopó, Elche, SpainHospital Universitario Alvaro Cunqueiro, Vigo, SpainHospital Universitario Lucus Augusti, Lugo, SpainHospital Son Espases, Palma de Mallorca, SpainComplejo Hospitalario de Navarra, Pamplona, SpainHospital Universitari Arnau de Vilanova, Lleida, SpainBackground. The resting full‐cycle ratio (RFR) is a novel resting index which in contrast to the gold standard (fractional flow reserve (FFR)) does not require maximum hyperemia induction. The objectives of this study were to evaluate the agreement between RFR and FFR with the currently recommended thresholds and to design a hybrid RFR-FFR ischemia detection strategy, allowing a reduction of coronary vasodilator use. Materials and Methods. Patients subjected to invasive physiological study in 9 Spanish centers were prospectively recruited between April 2019 and March 2020. Sensitivity and specificity studies were made to assess diagnostic accuracy between the recommended levels of RFR ≤0.89 and FFR ≤0.80 (primary objective) and to determine the RFR “grey zone” in order to define a hybrid strategy with FFR affording 95% global agreement compared with FFR alone (secondary objective). Results. A total of 380 lesions were evaluated in 311 patients. Significant correlation was observed (R2 = 0.81; P<0.001) between the two techniques, with 79% agreement between RFR ≤ 0.89 and FFR ≤ 0.80 (positive predictive value, 68%, and negative predictive value, 80%). The hybrid RFR-FFR strategy, administering only adenosine in the “grey zone” (RFR: 0.86 to 0.92), exhibited an agreement of over 95% with FFR, with high predictive values (positive predictive value, 91%, and negative predictive value, 92%), reducing the need for vasodilators by 58%. Conclusions. Dichotomous agreement between RFR and FFR with the recommended thresholds is significant but limited. The adoption of a hybrid RFR-FFR strategy affords very high agreement, with minimization of vasodilator use.http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2021/5522707
spellingShingle Juan Casanova-Sandoval
Diego Fernández-Rodríguez
Imanol Otaegui
Teresa Gil Jiménez
Marcos Rodríguez-Esteban
Kristian Rivera
Francisco Torres-Saura
Víctor Jiménez Díaz
Raymundo Ocaranza-Sánchez
Vicente Peral Disdier
Guillermo Sánchez-Elvira
Fernando Worner
Usefulness of the Hybrid RFR-FFR Approach: Results of a Prospective and Multicenter Analysis of Diagnostic Agreement between RFR and FFR—The RECOPA (REsting Full-Cycle Ratio Comparation versus Fractional Flow Reserve (A Prospective Validation)) Study
Journal of Interventional Cardiology
title Usefulness of the Hybrid RFR-FFR Approach: Results of a Prospective and Multicenter Analysis of Diagnostic Agreement between RFR and FFR—The RECOPA (REsting Full-Cycle Ratio Comparation versus Fractional Flow Reserve (A Prospective Validation)) Study
title_full Usefulness of the Hybrid RFR-FFR Approach: Results of a Prospective and Multicenter Analysis of Diagnostic Agreement between RFR and FFR—The RECOPA (REsting Full-Cycle Ratio Comparation versus Fractional Flow Reserve (A Prospective Validation)) Study
title_fullStr Usefulness of the Hybrid RFR-FFR Approach: Results of a Prospective and Multicenter Analysis of Diagnostic Agreement between RFR and FFR—The RECOPA (REsting Full-Cycle Ratio Comparation versus Fractional Flow Reserve (A Prospective Validation)) Study
title_full_unstemmed Usefulness of the Hybrid RFR-FFR Approach: Results of a Prospective and Multicenter Analysis of Diagnostic Agreement between RFR and FFR—The RECOPA (REsting Full-Cycle Ratio Comparation versus Fractional Flow Reserve (A Prospective Validation)) Study
title_short Usefulness of the Hybrid RFR-FFR Approach: Results of a Prospective and Multicenter Analysis of Diagnostic Agreement between RFR and FFR—The RECOPA (REsting Full-Cycle Ratio Comparation versus Fractional Flow Reserve (A Prospective Validation)) Study
title_sort usefulness of the hybrid rfr ffr approach results of a prospective and multicenter analysis of diagnostic agreement between rfr and ffr the recopa resting full cycle ratio comparation versus fractional flow reserve a prospective validation study
url http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2021/5522707
work_keys_str_mv AT juancasanovasandoval usefulnessofthehybridrfrffrapproachresultsofaprospectiveandmulticenteranalysisofdiagnosticagreementbetweenrfrandffrtherecoparestingfullcycleratiocomparationversusfractionalflowreserveaprospectivevalidationstudy
AT diegofernandezrodriguez usefulnessofthehybridrfrffrapproachresultsofaprospectiveandmulticenteranalysisofdiagnosticagreementbetweenrfrandffrtherecoparestingfullcycleratiocomparationversusfractionalflowreserveaprospectivevalidationstudy
AT imanolotaegui usefulnessofthehybridrfrffrapproachresultsofaprospectiveandmulticenteranalysisofdiagnosticagreementbetweenrfrandffrtherecoparestingfullcycleratiocomparationversusfractionalflowreserveaprospectivevalidationstudy
AT teresagiljimenez usefulnessofthehybridrfrffrapproachresultsofaprospectiveandmulticenteranalysisofdiagnosticagreementbetweenrfrandffrtherecoparestingfullcycleratiocomparationversusfractionalflowreserveaprospectivevalidationstudy
AT marcosrodriguezesteban usefulnessofthehybridrfrffrapproachresultsofaprospectiveandmulticenteranalysisofdiagnosticagreementbetweenrfrandffrtherecoparestingfullcycleratiocomparationversusfractionalflowreserveaprospectivevalidationstudy
AT kristianrivera usefulnessofthehybridrfrffrapproachresultsofaprospectiveandmulticenteranalysisofdiagnosticagreementbetweenrfrandffrtherecoparestingfullcycleratiocomparationversusfractionalflowreserveaprospectivevalidationstudy
AT franciscotorressaura usefulnessofthehybridrfrffrapproachresultsofaprospectiveandmulticenteranalysisofdiagnosticagreementbetweenrfrandffrtherecoparestingfullcycleratiocomparationversusfractionalflowreserveaprospectivevalidationstudy
AT victorjimenezdiaz usefulnessofthehybridrfrffrapproachresultsofaprospectiveandmulticenteranalysisofdiagnosticagreementbetweenrfrandffrtherecoparestingfullcycleratiocomparationversusfractionalflowreserveaprospectivevalidationstudy
AT raymundoocaranzasanchez usefulnessofthehybridrfrffrapproachresultsofaprospectiveandmulticenteranalysisofdiagnosticagreementbetweenrfrandffrtherecoparestingfullcycleratiocomparationversusfractionalflowreserveaprospectivevalidationstudy
AT vicenteperaldisdier usefulnessofthehybridrfrffrapproachresultsofaprospectiveandmulticenteranalysisofdiagnosticagreementbetweenrfrandffrtherecoparestingfullcycleratiocomparationversusfractionalflowreserveaprospectivevalidationstudy
AT guillermosanchezelvira usefulnessofthehybridrfrffrapproachresultsofaprospectiveandmulticenteranalysisofdiagnosticagreementbetweenrfrandffrtherecoparestingfullcycleratiocomparationversusfractionalflowreserveaprospectivevalidationstudy
AT fernandoworner usefulnessofthehybridrfrffrapproachresultsofaprospectiveandmulticenteranalysisofdiagnosticagreementbetweenrfrandffrtherecoparestingfullcycleratiocomparationversusfractionalflowreserveaprospectivevalidationstudy